“Bad strategy is the active avoidance of the hard work of crafting a good strategy.” – Richard Rumelt, Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters

Richard Rumelt’s work fundamentally reshaped how organizations and leaders approach the concept of strategy. The quote above highlights one of his most impactful insights: that bad strategy is not merely the absence of good intentions or smart people, but often a deliberate sidestep away from the demanding, honest work that true strategy requires.

In Good Strategy/Bad Strategy, Rumelt describes how strategy is frequently misunderstood and misapplied across organizations of all sizes. He observed that too often, what passes for “strategy” is a collection of ambitious goals, vague aspirations, or inspirational slogans. These may sound compelling, but they rarely grapple with the specific challenges or obstacles standing in the way of progress.

Rumelt emphasizes that developing good strategy demands serious effort: clear-eyed diagnosis of the real problem, formulation of guiding policies, and determination of coherent actions that address the root causes rather than the symptoms. This process can be uncomfortable and time-consuming, requiring leaders to confront unpleasant facts, challenge cherished assumptions, and make tough choices about what not to do.

The “active avoidance” Rumelt describes often manifests as substituting vision statements or a laundry list of goals for the deeper analytical work required. Leaders may focus on surface-level explanations such as “underperformance” without delving into why performance is lacking or what makes the challenge particularly difficult. In avoiding the discomfort and ambiguity inherent in diagnosing the true problem, organizations fall into the trap of “bad strategy”—plans that look polished but are disconnected from reality and unlikely to guide effective action.

Rumelt’s insight urges decision-makers to resist these shortcuts. He teaches that the heart of effective strategy is not found in lofty words or sheer optimism, but in the disciplined process of identifying the critical issues and focusing resources and attention on overcoming them. In his view, the willingness to do this hard work is what separates meaningful strategies from empty declarations.

About Richard Rumelt

Richard Rumelt is internationally recognized as a pioneer of strategic thought. As a professor emeritus at UCLA Anderson School of Management, he has spent decades studying organizations, advising leaders, and helping executives discern what truly drives success. Rumelt’s rigorous, practical approach challenges conventional wisdom by insisting that strategy starts with honest analysis and focused action—not with vision alone or the accumulation of goals.

His writing and teaching distill strategy to its essentials: diagnosis, guiding policy, and coherent action. Rumelt’s legacy is a body of work that encourages leaders to look past buzzwords and bravely tackle the real work of crafting solutions that make a measurable difference. This quote, and the thinking behind it, remains a call for rigor, honesty, and focus in every arena where strategy matters.

read more