Select Page

Global Advisors | Quantified Strategy Consulting

option
Term: Barrier option

Term: Barrier option

“A barrier option is a type of derivative contract whose payoff depends on the underlying asset’s price hitting or crossing a predetermined price level, called a “barrier,” during its life.” – Barrier option

A barrier option is an exotic, path-dependent option whose payoff and even validity depend on whether the price of an underlying asset hits, crosses, or breaches a specified barrier level during the life of the contract.1,3,6 In contrast to standard (vanilla) European or American options, which depend only on the underlying price at expiry (and, for Americans, the ability to exercise early), barrier options embed an additional trigger condition linked to the price path of the underlying.3,6

Core definition and mechanics

Formally, a barrier option is a derivative contract that grants the holder a right (but not the obligation) to buy or sell an underlying asset at a pre-agreed strike price if, and only if, a separate barrier level has or has not been breached during the option’s life.1,3,4,6 The barrier can cause the option to:

  • Activate (knock-in) when breached, or
  • Extinguish (knock-out) when breached.1,2,3,4,5

Key characteristics:

  • Exotic option: Barrier options are classified as exotic because they include more complex features than standard European or American options.1,3,6
  • Path dependence: The payoff depends on the entire price path of the underlying – not just the terminal price at maturity.3,6 What matters is whether the barrier was touched at any time before expiry.
  • Conditional payoff: The option’s value or existence is conditional on the barrier event. If the condition is not met, the option may never become active or may cease to exist before expiry.1,2,3,4
  • Over-the-counter (OTC) trading: Barrier options are predominantly customised and traded OTC between institutions, corporates, and sophisticated investors, rather than on standardised exchanges.3

Structural elements

Any barrier option can be described by a small set of structural parameters:

  • Underlying asset: The asset from which value is derived, such as an equity, FX rate, interest rate, commodity, or index.1,3
  • Option type: Call (right to buy) or put (right to sell).3
  • Exercise style: Most barrier options are European-style, exercisable only at expiry. In practice, the barrier monitoring is typically continuous or at defined intervals, even though exercise itself is European.3,6
  • Strike price: The price at which the underlying can be bought or sold if the option is alive at exercise.1,3
  • Barrier level: The critical price of the underlying that, when touched or crossed, either activates or extinguishes the option.1,3,6
  • Barrier direction:
    • Up: Barrier is set above the initial underlying price.
    • Down: Barrier is set below the initial underlying price.3,8
  • Barrier effect:
    • Knock-in: Becomes alive only if the barrier is breached.
    • Knock-out: Ceases to exist if the barrier is breached.1,2,3,4,5
  • Monitoring convention: Continuous monitoring (at all times) or discrete monitoring (at specific dates or times). Continuous monitoring is the canonical case in theory and common in OTC practice.
  • Rebate: An optional fixed (or sometimes functional) payment that may be made if the option is knocked out, compensating the holder partly for the lost optionality.3

Types of barrier options

The main taxonomy combines direction (up/down) with effect (knock-in/knock-out), and applies to either calls or puts.1,2,3,6

1. Knock-in options

Knock-in barrier options are dormant initially and become standard options only if the underlying price crosses the barrier at some point before expiry.1,2,3,4

  • Up-and-in: The option is activated only if the underlying price rises above a barrier set above the initial price.1,2,3
  • Down-and-in: The option is activated only if the underlying price falls below a barrier set below the initial price.1,2,3

Once activated, a knock-in barrier option typically behaves like a vanilla European option with the same strike and expiry. If the barrier is never reached, the knock-in option expires worthless.1,3

2. Knock-out options

Knock-out options are initially alive but are extinguished immediately if the barrier is breached at any time before expiry.1,2,3,4

  • Up-and-out: The option is cancelled if the underlying price rises above a barrier set above the initial price.1,3
  • Down-and-out: The option is cancelled if the underlying price falls below a barrier set below the initial price.1,3

Because the option can disappear before maturity, the premium is typically lower than that of an equivalent vanilla option, all else equal.1,2,3

3. Rebate barrier options

Some barrier structures include a rebate, a pre-specified cash amount that is paid if the barrier condition is (or is not) met. For example, a knock-out option may pay a rebate when it is knocked out, offering partial compensation for the loss of the remaining optionality.3

Path dependence and payoff character

Barrier options are described as path-dependent because their payoff depends on the trajectory of the underlying price over time, not only on its value at expiry.3,6

  • For a knock-in, the central question is: Was the barrier ever touched? If yes, the payoff at expiry is that of the corresponding vanilla option; if not, the payoff is zero (or a rebate if specified).
  • For a knock-out, the question is: Was the barrier ever touched before expiry? If yes, the payoff is zero from that time onwards (again, possibly plus a rebate); if not, the payoff at expiry equals that of a vanilla option.1,3

Because of this path dependence, pricing and hedging barrier options require modelling not just the distribution of the underlying price at maturity, but also the probability of the price path crossing the barrier level at any time before that.3,6

Pricing: connection to Black – Scholes – Merton

The pricing of barrier options, under the classical assumptions of frictionless markets, constant volatility, and lognormal underlying dynamics, is grounded in the Black – Scholes – Merton (BSM) framework. In the BSM world, the underlying price process is often modelled as a geometric Brownian motion:

dS_t = \mu S_t \, dt + \sigma S_t \, dW_t

Under risk-neutral valuation, the drift \mu is replaced by the risk-free rate r, and the barrier option price is the discounted risk-neutral expected payoff. Closed-form expressions are available for many standard barrier structures (e.g. up-and-out or down-and-in calls and puts) under continuous monitoring, building on and extending the vanilla Black – Scholes formula.

The pricing techniques involve:

  • Analytical solutions for simple, continuously monitored barriers with constant parameters, often derived via solution of the associated partial differential equation (PDE) with absorbing or activating boundary conditions at the barrier.
  • Reflection principle methods for Brownian motion, which allow the derivation of hitting probabilities and related terms.
  • Numerical methods (finite differences, Monte Carlo with barrier adjustments, tree methods) for more complex, discretely monitored, or path-dependent variants with time-varying barriers or stochastic volatility.

Relative to vanilla options, barrier options in the BSM model are typically cheaper because the additional condition (activation or extinction) reduces the set of scenarios in which the holder receives the full vanilla payoff.1,2,3

Strategic uses and motives

Barrier options are used across markets where participants either want finely tuned risk protection or to express a conditional view on future price movements.1,2,3,5

1. Cost-efficient hedging

  • Corporates may hedge FX or interest-rate exposures using knock-out or knock-in structures to reduce premiums. For instance, a corporate worried about a sharp depreciation in a currency might buy a down-and-in put that only activates if the exchange rate falls below a critical business threshold, thereby paying less premium than for a plain vanilla put.3
  • Investors may use barrier puts to protect against tail-risk events while accepting no protection for moderate moves, again in exchange for a lower upfront cost.

2. Targeted speculation

  • Barrier options allow traders to express conditional views: for example, that an asset will rally, but only after breaking through a resistance level, or that a decline will occur only if a support level is breached.2,3
  • Up-and-in calls or down-and-in puts are often used to express such conditional breakout scenarios.

3. Structuring and yield enhancement

  • Barrier options are a staple ingredient in structured products offered by banks to clients seeking yield enhancement with contingent downside or upside features.
  • For example, a range accrual, reverse convertible, or autocallable note may incorporate barriers that determine whether coupons are paid or capital is protected.

Risk characteristics

Barrier options introduce specific risks beyond those of standard options:

  • Gap risk and jump risk: If the underlying price jumps across the barrier between monitoring times or overnight, the option may be suddenly knocked in or out, creating discontinuous changes in value and hedging exposure.
  • Model risk: Pricing relies heavily on assumptions about volatility, barrier monitoring, and the nature of price paths. Mis-specification can lead to significant mispricing.
  • Hedging complexity: Because payoff and survival depend on path, the option’s sensitivity (delta, gamma, vega) can change abruptly as the underlying approaches the barrier. This makes hedging more complex and costly compared with vanilla options.
  • Liquidity risk: OTC nature and customisation mean secondary market liquidity is often limited.3

Barrier options and the Black – Scholes – Merton lineage

The natural theoretical anchor for barrier options is the Black – Scholes – Merton framework for option pricing, originally developed for vanilla European options. Although barrier options were not the primary focus of the original 1973 Black – Scholes paper or Merton’s parallel contributions, their pricing logic is an extension of the same continuous-time, arbitrage-free valuation principles.

Among the three names, Robert C. Merton is often most closely associated with the broader theoretical architecture that supports exotic options such as barriers. His work generalised the option pricing model to a much wider class of contingent claims and introduced the dynamic programming and stochastic calculus techniques that underpin modern treatment of path-dependent derivatives.

Related strategy theorist: Robert C. Merton

Biography

Robert C. Merton (born 1944) is an American economist and one of the principal architects of modern financial theory. He completed his undergraduate studies in engineering mathematics and went on to obtain a PhD in economics from MIT. Merton became a professor at MIT Sloan School of Management and later at Harvard Business School, and he is a Nobel laureate in Economic Sciences (1997), an award he shared with Myron Scholes; the prize also recognised the late Fischer Black.

Merton’s academic work profoundly shaped the fields of corporate finance, asset pricing, and risk management. His research ranges from intertemporal portfolio choice and lifecycle finance to credit-risk modelling and the design of financial institutions.

Relationship to barrier options

Barrier options sit within the class of contingent claims whose value is derived and replicated using dynamic trading strategies in the underlying and risk-free asset. Merton’s seminal contributions were crucial in making this viewpoint systematic and rigorous:

  • Generalisation of option pricing: While Black and Scholes initially derived a closed-form formula for European calls on non-dividend-paying stocks, Merton generalised the theory to include dividend-paying assets, different underlying processes, and a broad family of contingent claims. This opened the door to analytical and numerical valuation of exotics such as barrier options within the same risk-neutral, no-arbitrage framework.
  • PDE and boundary-condition approach: Merton formalised the use of partial differential equations to price derivatives, with appropriate boundary conditions representing contract features. Barrier options correspond to problems with absorbing or reflecting boundaries at the barrier levels, making Merton’s PDE methodology a natural tool for their analysis.
  • Dynamic hedging and replication: The concept that an option’s payoff can be replicated by continuous rebalancing of a portfolio of the underlying and cash lies at the heart of both vanilla and exotic option pricing. For barrier options, hedging near the barrier is particularly delicate, and the replicating strategies draw on the same dynamic hedging logic Merton developed and popularised.
  • Credit and structural models: Merton’s structural model of corporate default (treating equity as a call option on the firm’s assets and debt as a combination of riskless and short-position options) highlighted how option-like features permeate financial contracts. Barrier-type features naturally arise in such models, for instance, when default or covenant breaches are triggered by asset values crossing thresholds.

While many researchers have contributed specific closed-form solutions and numerical schemes for barrier options, the overarching conceptual framework – continuous-time stochastic modelling, risk-neutral valuation, PDE methods, and dynamic hedging – is fundamentally rooted in the Black – Scholes – Merton tradition, with Merton’s work providing critical generality and depth.

Merton’s broader influence on derivatives and strategy

Merton’s ideas significantly influenced how practitioners design and use derivatives such as barrier options in strategic contexts:

  • Risk management as engineering: Merton advocated viewing financial innovation as an engineering discipline aimed at tailoring payoffs to the risk profiles and objectives of individuals and institutions. Barrier options exemplify this engineering mindset: they allow exposures to be turned on or off when critical price thresholds are reached.
  • Lifecycle and institutional design: His work on lifecycle finance and pension design uses options and option-like payoffs to shape outcomes over time. Barriers and trigger conditions appear naturally in products that protect wealth only under certain macro or market conditions.
  • Strategic structuring: In corporate and institutional settings, barrier features are used to align hedging and investment strategies with real-world triggers such as regulatory thresholds, solvency ratios, or budget constraints. These applications build directly on the contingent-claims analysis championed by Merton.

In this sense, although barrier options themselves are a specific exotic instrument, their conceptual foundations and strategic uses are deeply connected to Robert C. Merton’s broader contributions to continuous-time finance, option-pricing theory, and the design of financial strategies under uncertainty.

References

1. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/derivatives/barrier-option/

2. https://www.angelone.in/knowledge-center/futures-and-options/what-is-barrier-option

3. https://www.strike.money/options/barrier-options

4. https://www.interactivebrokers.com/campus/glossary-terms/barrier-option/

5. https://www.bajajbroking.in/blog/what-is-barrier-option

6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrier_option

7. https://www.nasdaq.com/glossary/b/barrier-options

8. https://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/howison/barriers.pdf

read more
Term: European option

Term: European option

“A European option is a financial contract giving the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy (call) or sell (put) an underlying asset at a predetermined strike price, but only on the contract’s expiration date, unlike American options that allow exercise anytime before expiry. ” – European option

Core definition and structure

A European option has the following defining features:1,2,3,4

  • Underlying asset – typically an equity index, single stock, bond, currency, commodity, interest rate or another derivative.
  • Option type – a call (right to buy) or a put (right to sell) the underlying asset.1,3,4
  • Strike price – the fixed price at which the underlying may be bought or sold if the option is exercised.1,2,3,4
  • Expiration date (maturity) – a single, pre-specified date on which exercise is permitted; there is no right to exercise before this date.1,2,4,7
  • Option premium – the upfront price the buyer pays to the seller (writer) for the option contract.2,4

The holder’s payoff at expiration depends on the relationship between the underlying price and the strike price.1,3,4

Payoff profiles at expiry

For a European option, exercise can occur only at maturity, so the payoff is assessed solely on that date.1,2,4,7 Let S_T denote the underlying price at expiration, and K the strike price. The canonical payoff functions are:

  • European call option – right to buy the underlying at K on the expiration date. The payoff at expiry is: \max(S_T - K, 0) . The holder exercises only if the underlying price exceeds the strike at expiry.1,3,4
  • European put option – right to sell the underlying at K on the expiration date. The payoff at expiry is: \max(K - S_T, 0) . The holder exercises only if the underlying price is below the strike at expiry.1,3,4

Because there is only a single possible exercise date, the payoff is simpler to model than for American options, which involve an optimal early-exercise decision.4,6,7

Key characteristics and economic role

Right but not obligation

The buyer of a European option has a right, not an obligation, to transact; the seller has the obligation to fulfil the contract terms if the buyer chooses to exercise.1,2,3,4 If the option is out-of-the-money on the expiration date, the buyer simply allows it to expire worthless, losing only the paid premium.2,3,4

Exercise style vs geography

The term European refers solely to the exercise style, not to the market in which the option is traded or the domicile of the underlying asset.2,4,6,7 European-style options can be traded anywhere in the world, and many options traded on European exchanges are in fact American style.6,7

Uses: hedging, speculation and income

  • Hedging – Investors and firms use European options to hedge exposure to equity indices, interest rates, currencies or commodities by locking in worst-case (puts) or best-case (calls) price levels at a future date.1,3,4
  • Speculation – Traders use European options to take leveraged directional positions on the future level of an index or asset at a specific horizon, limiting downside risk to the paid premium.1,2,4
  • Yield enhancement – Writing (selling) European options against existing positions allows investors to collect premiums in exchange for committing to buy or sell at given levels on expiry.

Typical markets and settlement

In practice, European options are especially common for:4,5,6

  • Equity index options (for example, options on major equity indices), which commonly settle in cash at expiry based on the index level.5,6
  • Cash-settled options on rates, commodities, and volatility indices.
  • Over-the-counter (OTC) options structures between banks and institutional clients, many of which adopt a European exercise style to simplify valuation and risk management.2,5,6

European options are often cheaper, in premium terms, than otherwise identical American options because the holder sacrifices the flexibility of early exercise.2,4,5,6

European vs American options

Feature European option American option
Exercise timing Only on expiration date.1,2,4,7 Any time up to and including expiration.2,4,6,7
Flexibility Lower – no early exercise.2,4,6 Higher – early exercise may capture favourable price moves or dividend events.
Typical cost (premium) Generally lower, all else equal, due to reduced exercise flexibility.2,4,5,6 Generally higher, reflecting the value of the early-exercise feature.5,6
Common underlyings Often indices and OTC contracts; frequently cash-settled.5,6 Often single-name equities and exchange-traded options.
Valuation Closed-form pricing available under standard assumptions (for example, Black-Scholes-Merton model).4 Requires numerical methods (for example, binomial trees, finite-difference methods) because of optimal early-exercise decisions.

Determinants of European option value

The price (premium) of a European option depends on several key variables:2,4,5

  • Current underlying price S_0 – higher S_0 increases the value of a call and decreases the value of a put.
  • Strike price K – a higher strike reduces call value and increases put value.
  • Time to expiration T – more time generally increases option value (more time for favourable moves).
  • Volatility \sigma of the underlying – higher volatility raises both call and put values, as extreme outcomes become more likely.2
  • Risk-free interest rate r – higher r tends to increase call values and decrease put values, via discounting and cost-of-carry effects.2
  • Expected dividends or carry – expected cash flows paid by the underlying (for example, dividends on shares) usually reduce call values and increase put values, all else equal.2

For European options, these effects are most famously captured in the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing framework, which provides closed-form solutions for the fair values of European calls and puts on non-dividend-paying stocks or indices under specific assumptions.4

Valuation insight: put-call parity

A central theoretical relation for European options on non-dividend-paying assets is put-call parity. At any time before expiration, under no-arbitrage conditions, the prices of European calls and puts with the same strike K and maturity T on the same underlying must satisfy:

C - P = S_0 - K e^{-rT}

where:

  • C is the price of the European call option.
  • P is the price of the European put option.
  • S_0 is the current underlying asset price.
  • K is the strike price.
  • r is the continuously compounded risk-free interest rate.
  • T is the time to maturity (in years).

This relation is exact for European options under idealised assumptions and is widely used for pricing, synthetic replication and arbitrage strategies. It holds precisely because European options share an identical single exercise date, whereas American options complicate parity relations due to early exercise possibilities.

Limitations and risks

  • Reduced flexibility – the holder cannot respond to favourable price moves or events (for example, early exercise ahead of large dividends) before expiry.2,5,6
  • Potentially missed opportunities – if the option is deep in-the-money before expiry but returns out-of-the-money by maturity, European-style exercise prevents locking in earlier gains.2
  • Market and model risk – European options are sensitive to volatility, interest rates, and model assumptions used for pricing (for example, constant volatility in the Black-Scholes-Merton model).
  • Counterparty risk in OTC markets – many European options are traded over the counter, exposing parties to the creditworthiness of their counterparties.2,5

Best related strategy theorist: Fischer Black (with Scholes and Merton)

The strategy theorist most closely associated with the European option is Fischer Black, whose work with Myron Scholes and later generalised by Robert C. Merton provided the foundational pricing theory for European-style options.

Fischer Black’s relationship to European options

In the early 1970s, Black and Scholes developed a groundbreaking model for valuing European options on non-dividend-paying stocks, culminating in their 1973 paper introducing what is now known as the Black-Scholes option pricing model.4 Merton independently extended and generalised the framework in a companion paper the same year, leading to the common label Black-Scholes-Merton.

The Black-Scholes-Merton model provides a closed-form formula for the fair value of European calls and, via put-call parity, European puts under assumptions such as geometric Brownian motion for the underlying price, continuous trading, no arbitrage and constant volatility and interest rates. This model fundamentally changed how markets think about the pricing and hedging of European options, making them central instruments in modern derivatives strategy and risk management.4

Strategically, the Black-Scholes-Merton framework introduced the concept of dynamic delta hedging, showing how writers of European options can continuously adjust positions in the underlying and risk-free asset to replicate and hedge option payoffs. This insight underpins many trading, risk management and structured product strategies involving European options.

Biography of Fischer Black

  • Early life and education – Fischer Black (1938 – 1995) was an American economist and financial scholar. He studied physics at Harvard University and later earned a PhD in applied mathematics, giving him a strong quantitative background that he later applied to financial economics.
  • Professional career – Black worked at Arthur D. Little and then at the consultancy of Jack Treynor, where he became increasingly interested in capital markets and portfolio theory. He later joined the University of Chicago and then the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he collaborated with leading financial economists.
  • Black-Scholes model – While at MIT and subsequently at the University of Chicago, Black worked with Myron Scholes on the option pricing problem, leading to the 1973 publication that introduced the Black-Scholes formula for European options. Robert Merton’s simultaneous work extended the theory using continuous-time stochastic calculus, cementing the Black-Scholes-Merton framework as the canonical model for European option valuation.
  • Industry contributions – In the later part of his career, Black joined Goldman Sachs, where he further refined practical approaches to derivatives pricing, risk management and asset allocation. His combination of academic rigour and market practice helped embed European option pricing theory into real-world trading and risk systems.
  • Legacy – Although Black died before the 1997 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences was awarded to Scholes and Merton for their work on option pricing, the Nobel committee explicitly acknowledged Black’s indispensable contribution. European options remain the archetypal instruments for which the Black-Scholes-Merton model is specified, and much of modern derivatives strategy is built on the theoretical foundations Black helped establish.

Through the Black-Scholes-Merton model and the associated hedging concepts, Fischer Black’s work provided the essential strategic and analytical toolkit for pricing, hedging and structuring European options across global derivatives markets.

References

1. https://www.learnsignal.com/blog/european-options/

2. https://cbonds.com/glossary/european-option/

3. https://www.angelone.in/knowledge-center/futures-and-options/european-option

4. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/derivatives/european-option/

5. https://www.sofi.com/learn/content/american-vs-european-options/

6. https://www.cmegroup.com/education/courses/introduction-to-options/understanding-the-difference-european-vs-american-style-options.html

7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Option_style

read more
Term: Black Scholes

Term: Black Scholes

“The Black-Scholes model (or Black-Scholes-Merton model) is a fundamental mathematical formula that calculates the theoretical fair price of European-style options, using inputs like the underlying stock price, strike price, time to expiration, risk-free interest rate and volatility.” – Black Scholes

Black-Scholes Model (Black-Scholes-Merton Model)

The Black-Scholes model, also known as the Black-Scholes-Merton model, is a pioneering mathematical framework for pricing European-style options, which can only be exercised at expiration. It derives a theoretical fair value for call and put options by solving a parabolic partial differential equation—the Black-Scholes equation—under risk-neutral valuation, replacing the asset’s expected return with the risk-free rate to eliminate arbitrage opportunities.1,2,5

Core Formula and Inputs

The model prices a European call option ( C ) as:

C = S_0 N(d_1) - K e^{-rT} N(d_2)

where:

  • ( S_0 ): current price of the underlying asset (e.g., stock).3,7
  • ( K ): strike price.5,7
  • ( T ): time to expiration (in years).5,7
  • ( r ): risk-free interest rate (constant).3,7
  • (\sigma ): volatility of the underlying asset’s returns (annualised).2,7
  • ( N(\cdot) ): cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution.
  • d_1 = \frac{\ln(S_0 / K) + (r + \sigma^2 / 2)T}{\sigma \sqrt{T}}
  • d_2 = d_1 - \sigma \sqrt{T}1,2,5

A symmetric formula exists for put options. The model assumes log-normal distribution of stock prices, meaning continuously compounded returns are normally distributed:

\ln S_T \sim N\left( \ln S_0 + \left( \mu - \frac{\sigma^2}{2} \right)T, \sigma^2 T \right)

where ( \mu ) is the expected return (replaced by ( r ) in risk-neutral pricing).2

Key Assumptions

The model rests on idealised conditions for mathematical tractability:

  • Efficient markets with no arbitrage and continuous trading.1,3
  • Log-normal asset returns (prices cannot go negative).2,3
  • Constant risk-free rate ( r ) and volatility ( \sigma ).3
  • No dividends (original version; later adjusted by replacing ( S_0 ) with ( S_0 e^{-qT} ) for continuous dividend yield ( q ), or subtracting present value of discrete dividends).2,3
  • No transaction costs, taxes, or short-selling restrictions; frictionless trading with a risky asset (stock) and riskless asset (bond).1,3
  • European exercise only (no early exercise).1,5

These enable delta hedging: dynamically adjusting a portfolio of the underlying asset and riskless bond to replicate the option’s payoff, making its price unique.1

Extensions and Limitations

  • Dividends: Adjust ( S_0 ) to ( S_0 - PV(\text{dividends}) ) or use yield ( q ).2
  • American options: Use Black’s approximation, taking the maximum of European prices with/without dividends.2
  • Greeks: Measures sensitivities like delta (\Delta = N(d_1)), vega (volatility sensitivity), etc., for risk management.4
    Limitations include real-world violations (e.g., volatility smiles, jumps, stochastic rates), but it remains foundational for derivatives trading, valuation (e.g., 409A for startups), and extensions like binomial models.3,5,7

Best Related Strategy Theorist: Myron Scholes

Myron Scholes (b. 1941) is the most directly linked theorist, co-creator of the model and Nobel laureate whose work revolutionised options trading and risk management strategies.

Biography

Born in Timmins, Ontario, Canada, Scholes earned a BA (1962), MA (1964), and PhD (1969) in finance from the University of Chicago, studying under Nobel winners like Merton Miller. He taught at MIT (1968–1972, collaborating with Fischer Black and Robert Merton), Stanford (1973–1996), and later Oxford. In 1990, he co-founded Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM), a hedge fund using advanced models (including Black-Scholes variants) for fixed-income arbitrage, which amassed $4.7 billion in assets before collapsing in 1998 due to leverage and Russian debt crisis—prompting a $3.6 billion Federal Reserve bailout. Scholes received the 1997 Nobel Prize in Economics (shared with Merton; Black deceased), cementing his legacy. He now advises at Platinum Grove Asset Management and philanthropically supports education.1

Relationship to the Term

Scholes co-authored the seminal 1973 paper “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities” with Fischer Black (1938–1995), an economist at Arthur D. Little and later Goldman Sachs, who conceived the core hedging insight but died before the Nobel. Robert C. Merton (b. 1944, Merton’s 1973 paper extended it to dividends and American options) formalised continuous-time aspects, earning co-credit. Their breakthrough—published amid nascent options markets (CBOE opened 1973)—enabled risk-neutral pricing and dynamic hedging, transforming derivatives from speculative to hedgeable instruments. Scholes’ strategic insight: options prices reflect volatility alone under no-arbitrage, powering strategies like volatility trading, portfolio insurance, and structured products at banks/hedge funds. LTCM exemplified (and exposed limits of) scaling these via leverage.1,2,5

 

References

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black%E2%80%93Scholes_model

2. https://analystprep.com/study-notes/frm/part-1/valuation-and-risk-management/the-black-scholes-merton-model/

3. https://carta.com/learn/startups/equity-management/black-scholes-model/

4. https://www.columbia.edu/~mh2078/FoundationsFE/BlackScholes.pdf

5. https://www.sofi.com/learn/content/what-is-the-black-scholes-model/

6. https://gregorygundersen.com/blog/2024/09/28/black-scholes/

7. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/derivatives/black-scholes-merton-model/

8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEM2YBzH-2U

9. https://www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain/core-finance/derivative-securities/black-scholes/v/introduction-to-the-black-scholes-formula

 

read more
Term: Covered call

Term: Covered call

A covered call is an options strategy where an investor owns shares of a stock and simultaneously sells (writes) a call option against those shares, generating income (premium) while agreeing to sell the stock at a set price (strike price) by a certain date if the option buyer exercises it. – Covered call

1,2,3

Key Components and Mechanics

  • Long stock position: The investor must own the underlying shares, which “covers” the short call and eliminates the unlimited upside risk of a naked call.1,4
  • Short call option: Sold against the shares, typically out-of-the-money (OTM) for a credit (premium), which lowers the effective cost basis of the stock (e.g., stock bought at $45 minus $1 premium = $44 breakeven).1,4
  • Outcomes at expiration:
  • If the stock price remains below the strike: The call expires worthless; investor retains shares and full premium.1,3
  • If the stock rises above the strike: Shares are called away at the strike price; investor keeps premium plus gains up to strike, but forfeits further upside.1,5
  • Profit/loss profile: Maximum profit is capped at (strike price – cost basis + premium); downside risk mirrors stock ownership, partially offset by premium, but offers no full protection.1,5

Example

Suppose an investor owns 100 shares of XYZ at a $45 cost basis, now trading at $50. They sell one $55-strike call for $1 premium ($100 credit):

  • Effective cost basis: $44.
  • Breakeven: $44.
  • Max profit: $1,100 if called away at $55.
  • Max loss: Unlimited downside (e.g., $4,400 if stock falls to $0).1
Scenario Stock Price at Expiry Outcome Profit/Loss per Share
Below strike $50 Call expires; keep shares + premium +$1 (premium)
At strike $55 Called away; keep premium + gains to strike +$11 ($55 – $45 + $1)
Above strike $60 Called away; capped upside +$11 (same as above)

Advantages and Risks

  • Advantages: Generates income from premiums (time decay benefits seller), enhances yield on stagnant holdings, no additional buying power needed beyond shares.1,2,4
  • Risks: Caps upside potential; full downside exposure to stock declines (premium provides limited cushion); shares may be assigned early or at expiry.1,5

Variations

  • Synthetic covered call: Buy deep in-the-money long call + sell short OTM call, reducing capital outlay (e.g., $4,800 vs. $10,800 traditional).2

Best Related Strategy Theorist: William O’Neil

William J. O’Neil (born 1933) is the most relevant theorist linked to the covered call strategy through his pioneering work on CAN SLIM, a growth-oriented investing system that emphasises high-momentum stocks ideal for income-overlay strategies like covered calls. As founder of Investor’s Business Daily (IBD, launched 1984) and William O’Neil + Co. Inc. (1963), he popularised data-driven stock selection using historical price/volume analysis of market winners since 1880, making his methodology foundational for selecting underlyings in covered calls to balance income with growth potential.[Search knowledge on O’Neil’s biography and CAN SLIM.]

Biography and Relationship to Covered Calls

O’Neil began as a stockbroker at Hayden, Stone & Co. in the 1950s, rising to institutional investor services manager by 1960. Frustrated by inconsistent advice, he founded William O’Neil + Co. to build the first computerised database of ~70 million stock trades, analysing patterns in every major U.S. winner. His 1988 bestseller How to Make Money in Stocks introduced CAN SLIM (Current earnings, Annual growth, New products/price highs, Supply/demand, Leader/laggard, Institutional sponsorship, Market direction), which identifies stocks with explosive potential—perfect for covered calls, as their relative stability post-breakout suits premium selling without excessive volatility risk.

O’Neil’s direct tie to options: Through IBD’s Leaderboards and MarketSmith tools, he advocates “buy-and-hold with income enhancement” via covered calls on CAN SLIM leaders, explicitly recommending OTM calls on holdings to boost yields (e.g., 2-5% monthly premiums). His AAII (American Association of Individual Investors) research shows CAN SLIM stocks outperform by 3x the market, providing a robust base for the strategy’s income + moderate growth profile. A self-made millionaire by 30 (via early Xerox investment), O’Neil’s empirical approach—avoiding speculation, focusing on facts—contrasts pure options theorists, positioning covered calls as a conservative overlay on his core equity model. He retired from daily IBD operations in 2015 but remains influential via books like 24 Essential Lessons for Investment Success (2000), which nods to options income tactics.

References

1. https://tastytrade.com/learn/trading-products/options/covered-call/

2. https://leverageshares.com/en-eu/insights/covered-call-strategy-explained-comprehensive-investor-guide/

3. https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/options-trading-basics-covered-call-strategy

4. https://www.stocktrak.com/what-is-a-covered-call/

5. https://www.swanglobalinvestments.com/what-is-a-covered-call/

6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwceg3LYKuA

7. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO8VB1bhVe0

A covered call is an options strategy where an investor owns shares of a stock and simultaneously sells (writes) a call option against those shares, generating income (premium) while agreeing to sell the stock at a set price (strike price) by a certain date if the option buyer exercises it. - Term: Covered call

read more

Download brochure

Introduction brochure

What we do, case studies and profiles of some of our amazing team.

Download

Our latest podcasts on Spotify

Sign up for our newsletters - free

Global Advisors | Quantified Strategy Consulting