Breaking Business News | Breaking business news AM | Breaking Business News PM

Plastic pollution: scientists track a cargo spill from New York to Norway, reveal how currents disperse harmful substances

11 May 2021

m.mphoto/Shutterstock

The blocking of the Suez Canal in March by a megaship named Ever Given delayed over 200 vessels laden with thousands of containers, serving as a reminder of the scale of the shipping industry and the global repercussions when something goes badly wrong at sea. Yet most people remain unaware of just how frequently the cargo carried by huge container ships doesn’t make it to port at all.

Several thousand containers are believed to be lost overboard each year – the result of bad weather, poor stowage, inadequate supervision and even the size of the ship itself. The steel containers plunge quickly towards the seabed, with many rupturing under pressure or from the impact when they hit the ocean floor.

If the material in the container is significantly denser than seawater, its dispersion will be localised and confined to the sea floor. But articles with a density close to or lower than seawater, including many common plastics, disperse to the ocean surface, where they’re often carried thousands of miles onto far-flung beaches. In a previous study, my colleagues and I found evidence such plastics can survive in the ocean for up to 1,300 years.

Our recent study tracked a spill of Hewlett-Packard inkjet cartridges, which is believed to have taken place 1,500km east of New York in 2014. Using social media to connect with beachcombers, we found the cartridges had spread as far south as Cape Verde and as far north as the Arctic Circle.

Spills at sea

Most container losses go unreported and undocumented because, at present, there’s no obligation for lost cargo to be declared unless it’s of a hazardous nature and likely to pose an immediate threat to the environment. This means that evidence of cargo from lost containers is usually restricted to groups of distinctive plastic items, noticed primarily by regular beachcombers.

In 1997, for example, over sixty containers were lost from the Tokio Express after a giant wave tilted the vessel 60 degrees to the side as it was rounding Land’s End in south-west England. One of the containers was filled with nearly 5 million pieces of nautical-themed Lego, which have been beaching along the coastline of Cornwall ever since.

Depending on the location of a spill, cargo that floats on the sea’s surface – which the UN estimates to comprise 15% of all marine litter – provides an opportunity for scientists to study ocean circulation.

This was the case in 1992 when a container of childrens’ bath toys, including a consignment of rubber ducks, was lost in the centre of the North Pacific. They were subsequently reported by beachcombers over a range of thousands of miles, allowing scientists to learn about the circulation of the surface waters of the North Pacific Ocean.

Then, in 2014, small but distinctive Hewlett-Packard inkjet cartridges began to appear on the beaches of the Azores islands in the centre of the North Atlantic. My colleague, Tracey Williams, posted calls for further sightings on an international beachcombing group on social media, with over 50,000 members.

Reports soon came flooding in. Sightings were shared along the coasts of western Europe, the Canary Islands, Cape Verde, Bermuda and Florida. Some cartridges were found on the shores of the North Sea and the beaches of northern Norway.

This extensive dataset on locations and timings revealed how buoyant plastic was transported across the North Atlantic Ocean by different currents, with cartridges spreading nearly 8,000km in less than four years at an average drift speed of 10cm a second.

We then used PlasticAdrift, an oceanographic model, to simulate cartridge transport from the spill site. The model’s outputs were very similar to observations made by our beachcombing “citizen scientists”, but key discrepancies highlighted where the model could be improved and how beaching could be incorporated into oceanographic transport simulations.

Ocean microplastics

After gathering our data, we extended our study to examine the biofouling and weathering of the cartridge plastic. Over their relatively short exposure to the sea, the cartridges’ polypropylene shell already exhibited considerable deterioration – a source of microplastics we know are widespread in our oceans.


Read more: Seafloor currents sweep microplastics into deep-sea hotspots of ocean life


Electronic tags remaining on some cartridges also contained potentially hazardous chemicals, including brominated flame retardants and copper. The presence of these tags classify the spill as electronic plastic, and as such the cartridges should be regulated under more stringent electronic waste regulations.

Currents tend to ferry and concentrate plastics into ‘garbage patches’ in certain areas of the sea.

Regarding spills more generally, the International Maritime Organization has recently established an action plan for 2025 that will consider a compulsory means of declaring plastic litter derived from containers lost at sea. Such regulations will incentivise better stowage and provide scientists with a greater insight into the problem of ocean pollution from spillages.

Andrew Turner does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.


Read the full article here.
This content was originally published by The Conversation. Original publishers retain all rights. It appears here for a limited time before automated archiving.By The Conversation

Covid-19 – Johns Hopkins University

Download brochure

Introduction brochure

What we do, case studies and profiles of some of our amazing team.

Download

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!