SMPostStory Archives - Global Advisors | Quantified Strategy Consulting

Quote: Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller and professor

“Today I choose courage over comfort.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller and professor

Brené Brown, a research professor, author, and renowned speaker, is celebrated worldwide for her groundbreaking work on vulnerability, courage, shame, and empathy. This quote encapsulates her core philosophy: that true growth—whether personal, relational, or professional—comes not from staying safe within our comfort zones, but from making the conscious decision to face discomfort and uncertainty with bravery.

Brown’s landmark research revealed that vulnerability is not a weakness, but the greatest measure of courage. She explored these ideas in bestsellers like Daring Greatly, The Gifts of Imperfection, and Rising Strong, inspiring millions across the globe to lead more authentic, whole-hearted lives. Her now-famous TED Talk, “The Power of Vulnerability,” has become a touchstone in conversations about human connection and resilience.

The context for “Today I choose courage over comfort” can be found throughout Brown’s writings and lectures. For Brown, integrity is defined by the willingness to act with courage even when it’s uncomfortable, choosing what is right over what is easy. In her book Rising Strong, she writes:

“Integrity is choosing courage over comfort; choosing what is right over what is fun, fast, or easy; and choosing to practice our values rather than simply professing them.”

Brown consistently emphasizes that vulnerability and courage are inextricably linked—there is no courage without uncertainty and emotional risk. Whether addressing leaders, entrepreneurs, or anyone striving for meaningful change, she challenges us to “show up, be seen, and live brave” even when endurance is hard.

About Brené Brown:
A research professor at the University of Houston, Brown’s two decades of study have shaped contemporary conversations around emotional intelligence, ethical leadership, and authentic connection. She is celebrated for bringing academic rigor to subjects previously avoided in business and personal development: the mechanics of trust, the costs of shame, and the anatomy of belonging.

Pioneers in the Field of Courage and Vulnerability

Brown’s work builds upon and amplifies insights from earlier theorists who explored courage, authenticity, and human flourishing:

Theodore Roosevelt: His “Man in the Arena” speech inspired Brown’s focus on daring greatly—celebrating those who risk failure in pursuit of something meaningful.
Carl Rogers: A foundational humanistic psychologist, Rogers championed unconditional positive regard and authenticity in relationships, emphasizing the healing power of being seen and accepted as we are.
Abraham Maslow: Known for Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, he placed self-actualization—the fulfillment of one’s potential—at the top, arguing that courage to grow is what drives humans upward.
Viktor Frankl: The Holocaust survivor and psychiatrist described meaning as a central motivator in life, and wrote extensively on the courage necessary to find purpose even in hardship.
Angela Duckworth: A contemporary researcher, Duckworth studies grit, the combination of passion and perseverance, dovetailing with Brown’s view that courage sustains effort beyond comfort.

Together, these theorists shaped the understanding that thriving requires more than talent or intelligence—it demands the willingness to be vulnerable, to stumble, and to rise stronger.

Resonance of the Quote

“Today I choose courage over comfort” stands as a daily reminder to honour our values, even when ease and avoidance tempt us. Brown’s legacy is the call to action: Lead with heart. Embrace discomfort. Make the brave choice—not just once, but day after day, in ways that transform lives, organizations, and communities.

Term: Congruence

Congruence, as defined by Carl Rogers, is a state of alignment or harmony between an individual’s self-concept (their real self) and their ideal self (who they wish to be). Rogers developed this term within his humanistic approach to psychology in the 1950s, making it a central tenet of person-centered therapy.

Congruence means that our feelings, thoughts, and outward behaviours consistently reflect our true values and beliefs. When we are congruent, we accept and recognize our emotional experiences without distortion or denial. This internal unity leads to authenticity and a sense of well-being, as our actions and communications transparently match our internal state.

If the self-concept and real experiences are in sync, a person is congruent.
If there is a mismatch—a person pretends or hides their true feelings—this is incongruence.

Rogers was clear that perfect congruence is rare; most people fluctuate between states of congruence and incongruence. Striving towards greater congruence, however, supports mental health, self-esteem, resilience, and deeper relationships. Rogers emphasized that congruence is enabled by experiences of unconditional positive regard: being valued by others without conditions leads people to accept themselves and, over time, align their ideal and real selves.

“We cannot change, we cannot move away from what we are, until we thoroughly accept what we are. Then change seems to come about almost unnoticed.”—Carl Rogers

Related Strategy Theorist: Abraham Maslow

Backstory and Theoretical Relationship

Abraham Maslow is the most significant related theorist when it comes to congruence, particularly through his concept of self-actualization. Maslow, like Rogers, was a founder of humanistic psychology. Self-actualization refers to the fulfilment of one’s unique potential and the desire to become everything one is capable of becoming. Maslow placed this at the pinnacle of his Hierarchy of Needs, suggesting that after basic physiological and psychological needs are met, individuals are driven to realize their true selves—a state highly congruent with Rogers’ congruence.

Maslow’s work on authenticity, growth, and inner motivation provided a broader societal and organizational context for Rogers’ ideas. While Rogers delved into therapy and the individual’s emotional life, Maslow examined what congruent living looks like in leadership, creativity, and strategic action. His studies of exemplary individuals (like Abraham Lincoln and Eleanor Roosevelt) showcased that the most successful people are deeply congruent: they live by deeply held principles, are comfortable with themselves, and integrate their personal and professional actions around their genuine values.

Biography:
Abraham Maslow (1908–1970), American psychologist and professor, began his career studying motivation and personality. Dissatisfied with the era’s focus on pathology, he championed human potential, peak experiences, and holistic well-being. Maslow’s legacy continues through modern organizational development, leadership theory, and coaching—domains where alignment between belief, strategy, and action (congruence) is recognized as the hallmark of effective leadership.

In summary, both Rogers and Maslow emphasized that living congruently—not just knowing our values but embodying them in action—is essential for authentic growth, psychological health, and strategic clarity.

Quote: Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller and professor

“Blame is simply the discharging of discomfort and pain. It has an inverse relationship with accountability. Blaming is a way that we discharge anger.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

The quote emerges from Brené Brown’s extensive research into vulnerability, emotional intelligence, and the social dynamics of blame and accountability. As a renowned research professor, author, and speaker, Brown has spent decades exploring how people respond to adversity, shame, and imperfection, particularly in contexts that demand courage and connection.

This particular insight derives from Brown’s exploration of why people instinctively assign blame when confronted with pain or anger. Rather than solving problems or fostering growth, blame offers a false sense of relief—it shifts discomfort outward and temporarily soothes our own emotional turmoil. However, as Brown’s research demonstrates, blame is ultimately counterproductive; it consumes energy that could be spent on honest self-reflection and constructive dialogue, undermining the very possibility of real change or learning.

Brown shares candid, sometimes humorous stories about her own “blamer” tendencies, illuminating the universal nature of these behaviours and the courage required to break the cycle. She emphasizes that accountability—facing our role in situations, admitting mistakes, and communicating openly—demands vulnerability and resilience. True accountability opens the door to empathy, growth, and trust, while habitual blame keeps us defensive and disconnected.

Brown’s work on this subject has become foundational for leaders, educators, and organizations that prioritize psychological safety and high-functioning teams. Her call is not simply to reduce blame, but to build cultures where compassionate responsibility and honest conversations replace finger-pointing and shame.

The Person Behind the Quote: Brené Brown

Brené Brown is a research professor at the University of Houston and a visiting professor at the University of Texas at Austin McCombs School of Business. She is the author of multiple New York Times bestsellers, including Daring Greatly, The Gifts of Imperfection, and Dare to Lead, and is widely recognized for her TED talk, “The Power of Vulnerability,” which has been viewed by millions worldwide.

Brown’s career is distinguished by her focus on vulnerability, courage, authenticity, and shame. Her work bridges rigorous academic research with practical guidance, helping individuals and organizations harness the power of difficult emotions to foster deeper connection and greater innovation. Her thoughtful insights into the dynamics of blame and accountability have reshaped conversations in business, education, healthcare, and public service.

Leading Theorists Related to Blame and Accountability

The study of blame, accountability, and emotional process has roots in multiple fields, from psychology to conflict resolution. Notable contributors include:

Marshall B. Rosenberg: Creator of Nonviolent Communication (NVC), Rosenberg argued that blame and punitive mindsets perpetuate conflict rather than resolve it. He believed that all violence results from people tricking themselves into thinking their pain is caused by others, leading to cycles of blame and retribution. His teachings focus on empathy, personal responsibility, and compassionate dialogue.
Andy Stanley: In leadership and organizational theory, Stanley provides insight into the futility of blame as an agent of change. He famously noted, “People who blame things rarely change things. Blame is an unassailable change-avoidance strategy.” His perspective reinforces the notion that embracing accountability is essential for growth and problem-solving.
Albert Ellis: A notable psychologist and creator of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT), Ellis emphasized personal accountability as central to emotional well-being. He taught that individuals must recognize and change their own irrational beliefs and reactions, including blaming others for their feelings and circumstances.
Aaron T. Beck: The father of cognitive therapy, Beck’s research into cognitive distortions highlights that blame is often a symptom of deeper misconceptions about self and others, impeding effective problem-solving and emotional regulation.

Together, these theorists—along with Brown’s own influential voice—have illuminated the traps of reflexive blame and the transformative potential of compassionate accountability. Their collective work speaks to a universal truth: To create lasting change and connection, we must be willing to move beyond blame, confront vulnerability, and embrace responsibility.

Term: Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT)

Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT) is a pioneering, action-oriented form of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) developed by psychologist Albert Ellis in the 1950s. At its core, REBT is based on the idea that emotional distress and maladaptive behaviors are primarily caused not by external events themselves, but by our irrational beliefs and interpretations of those events.

REBT aims to help individuals identify, challenge, and replace irrational beliefs with more realistic, flexible, and rational ones, leading to healthier emotions and behaviours. The therapy centers around the ABC model, which illustrates this process:

A – Activating Event: Something happens in your environment that triggers a response.
B – Belief: The thoughts and beliefs (often irrational) about the event.
C – Consequence: The emotional and behavioural outcomes that result from those beliefs.

For example, a person who does not receive a response to a message may irrationally believe, “They must not like me; I’ll always be alone” (B), leading to feelings of anxiety or depression (C). REBT works to dismantle such irrational beliefs and replace them, for instance, with, “Maybe they’re busy; one unanswered message does not define my worth.”

Key principles of REBT include:

Understanding that thoughts, emotions, and behaviors are interconnected.
Teaching that irrational, rigid beliefs (“I must succeed,” “Others should,” “Life ought to…”) are the source of much emotional suffering.
Promoting unconditional self-acceptance, unconditional other-acceptance, and unconditional life-acceptance (USA, UOA, ULA), regardless of circumstances or mistakes.

REBT is particularly valuable for those dealing with anxiety, depression, anger, guilt, shame, perfectionism, and relationship or performance issues. The therapy is active, directive, and pragmatic, focusing on present thoughts and behaviors to produce meaningful, lasting change.

Albert Ellis: The Leading Theorist and His Relationship to REBT

Albert Ellis (1913–2007) was an American psychologist and one of the most influential figures in modern psychotherapy. Dissatisfied with the slower pace and interpretative nature of psychoanalysis—which he originally practiced—Ellis developed REBT as a more practical and empirically grounded approach to psychological well-being.

Driven by the insight that patients’ suffering was more often rooted in dysfunctional thinking rather than external circumstances, Ellis began systematically teaching clients how to recognize, dispute, and replace their irrational beliefs. His approach was revolutionary in that it placed the responsibility for emotion and behavior squarely on the individual’s beliefs, empowering clients to take control of their internal narratives and emotional responses.

Ellis’s impact extends far beyond the therapy room. His work provided the foundational principles for the broader family of cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT)—including Aaron T. Beck’s cognitive therapy—transforming how psychological disorders are understood and treated worldwide. Over his career, Ellis published more than 75 books and authored hundreds of articles, becoming known for his direct style, wit, and unwavering commitment to helping people confront their self-defeating beliefs.

He famously stated:

“The best years of your life are the ones in which you decide your problems are your own. You do not blame them on your mother, the ecology, or the president. You realize that you control your own destiny.”

Ellis’s legacy lives on in the tens of thousands of clinicians and millions of clients who continue to benefit from the clear, rational, and compassionate principles of REBT.

Quote: Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

“Courage starts with showing up and letting ourselves be seen.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

This quote from Brené Brown distills the essence of her two decades of research into a simple yet profound truth: True courage is rooted in vulnerability—the willingness to show up authentically and allow ourselves to be seen, despite uncertainty or risk. When Brown speaks of “showing up,” she refers to the act of engaging fully in life, relationships, workplaces, and communities, even when outcomes are uncertain or we fear judgment. The second half, “letting ourselves be seen,” invites individuals to move beyond façades, embrace their authentic selves, and risk openness in order to foster genuine connection and growth.

Brown’s work has illuminated how authentic leadership and meaningful relationships depend not on perfection or bravado, but on the willingness to be vulnerable. Her research demonstrates that courageous leadership, innovation, and resilient cultures emerge when people are supported in being seen as they are, imperfections and all.

Brown first brought this perspective into the public consciousness with her widely viewed TEDx talk, “The Power of Vulnerability,” where she explored the intersection of courage, vulnerability, and shame. Since then, she has expanded on these themes through bestsellers such as Daring Greatly, Dare to Lead, and The Gifts of Imperfection. The quote epitomizes her belief that vulnerability is not a weakness but the birthplace of innovation, creativity, and change.

About Brené Brown

Brené Brown is a research professor at the University of Houston, where she holds the Huffington Foundation Endowed Chair at the Graduate College of Social Work. She is also a visiting professor of management at the University of Texas at Austin McCombs School of Business. Brown’s work is grounded in qualitative research, focusing on the complex human experiences of courage, vulnerability, shame, and empathy.

She is the author of six #1 New York Times bestsellers and the host of the acclaimed podcasts Unlocking Us and Dare to Lead. Brown’s influence extends from academia into popular culture and organizations worldwide. Her TED talk, “The Power of Vulnerability,” ranks among the most viewed globally, reflecting her skill as a storyteller who marries in-depth research with accessible, relatable insights. She has also produced content for major platforms such as Netflix and HBO Max, further advancing conversations on leadership and emotional intelligence.

Leading Theorists Related to the Subject Matter

The study of courage, vulnerability, and personal growth is informed by a rich tapestry of psychological and sociological thought. In addition to Brown, several theorists have shaped the contemporary understanding of these topics:

Carl Rogers: A founding figure in humanistic psychology, Rogers emphasized the importance of unconditional positive regard and authentic self-expression, arguing that being truly seen by others fosters personal growth. His client-centered approach underpins much of the value placed on vulnerability in modern psychological practice.
Albert Bandura: Bandura’s work on self-efficacy and social learning underscores the significance of modeling behaviors—including the courage to take risks and reveal one’s authentic self—as mechanisms for individual and group development.
Kristin Neff: A pioneer in self-compassion research, Neff explores how self-kindness and mindfulness promote resilience and openness, particularly in the face of perceived failure or imperfection. Her work aligns closely with Brown’s focus on vulnerability and shame resilience.
James K. Stoller (and contemporaries in leadership science): Research on authentic leadership highlights that transparent, vulnerable leaders inspire trust, foster innovation, and achieve better outcomes in complex environments—a direct reflection of Brown’s themes.

Brown’s scholarship is uniquely influential because she bridges the academic and practical realms, showing how research-backed principles of courage and connection are essential not just for personal transformation, but for healthy organizations and communities. Her insight—that courage begins with the simple but costly act of showing up and being seen—speaks to a universal need and a timeless call to leadership and humanity.

Term: Mindfulness

Mindfulness is a cognitive skill that involves maintaining a moment-by-moment awareness of one’s thoughts, feelings, bodily sensations, and surrounding environment, often through meditation or sustained practice. It is characterized by a non-judgmental acceptance of the present moment, allowing individuals to observe their internal states and emotions without becoming entangled in them. This practice has roots in Buddhist meditation but has evolved into a secular tool for enhancing mental and physical well-being in the Western world.

Mindfulness has been widely adopted in various therapeutic interventions, including mindfulness-based cognitive behaviour therapy (MBCT), mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). These practices help individuals manage stress, anxiety, and depression by cultivating a mindful approach to their experiences.

Related Strategy Theorist: Jon Kabat-Zinn

Backstory and Relationship to Mindfulness

Jon Kabat-Zinn is a pivotal figure in the modern Western adaptation of mindfulness. Born on June 5, 1944, in New York City, Kabat-Zinn is an American scientist, writer, and meditation teacher. He is most renowned for founding the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program at the University of Massachusetts Medical School in 1979. This program has been instrumental in popularizing mindfulness as a therapeutic tool worldwide.

Kabat-Zinn’s journey into mindfulness began during his Ph.D. studies in molecular biology. He became interested in Buddhism and meditation, seeing them as a way to apply mindfulness to everyday life. His work seeks to integrate mindfulness with Western psychology and medicine, making it accessible for people from diverse backgrounds. Through his research and teaching, Kabat-Zinn has shown how mindfulness can improve physical and mental health, reduce stress, and enhance overall well-being.

Biography

Kabat-Zinn holds a Ph.D. in molecular biology from MIT and is a long-time practitioner of meditation and yoga. He is the author of several books, including Full Catastrophe Living and Wherever You Go, There You Are, which have contributed significantly to the popular understanding of mindfulness. His work has inspired numerous mindfulness programs across the globe, transforming the way healthcare providers approach mental health and stress management.

Today, Kabat-Zinn continues to advocate for mindfulness as a powerful tool for personal growth and societal transformation. His legacy in developing MBSR has made mindfulness a cornerstone of modern psychological practice, demonstrating its potential to foster resilience and well-being in individuals and communities.

Additional Key Figures:

Thích Nh?t H?nh: A renowned Buddhist monk and peace activist, H?nh is another influential figure in popularizing mindfulness. He has written extensively on the practice and its application in everyday life.
Kristin Neff: Known for her work on self-compassion, Neff’s research often intersects with mindfulness, as both practices emphasize the importance of non-judgmental awareness.

Quote: Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

““Owning our story can be hard but not nearly as difficult as spending our lives running from it. Embracing our vulnerabilities is risky but not nearly as dangerous as giving up on love and belonging and joy – the experiences that make us the most vulnerable. Only when we are brave enough to explore the darkness will we discover the infinite power of our light.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

Brené Brown is a renowned researcher, storyteller, and professor whose work has fundamentally reshaped how we understand and engage with concepts such as vulnerability, courage, shame, and empathy. As a research professor at the University of Houston and the director of the Center for Daring Leadership at BetterUp, Brown has spent more than two decades delving into how these attributes shape our sense of connection, leadership, and psychological well-being.

The quote in question comes from Brown’s deep exploration into the “power of vulnerability.” Her seminal TEDx talk in 2010, The Power of Vulnerability, distilled a decade of academic research into a message that resonated around the world. Brown’s research revealed that embracing our vulnerabilities—not hiding from them—is essential for experiencing the fullness of love, belonging, and joy. She argues that running from our stories, especially those parts we hide out of shame, actually distances us from meaning, connection, and authenticity. True courage, she asserts, is found not in avoiding darkness or risk but in stepping into it, trusting that doing so reveals our deepest strengths.

Brown’s work is grounded in her use of qualitative research methods, particularly Grounded Theory, to analyse interviews and narratives across hundreds of individuals. This rigorous approach uncovered that resilience in the face of shame and the willingness to be open—rather than closed off—directly correlates with living a more fulfilling, wholehearted life.

Context of the Quote

“Owning our story can be hard but not nearly as difficult as spending our lives running from it…” encapsulates Brown’s thesis: the real danger lies not in being vulnerable but in refusing vulnerability altogether. In a world where self-presentation—magnified by social media and societal pressures—often feels safer than honesty, Brown’s research champions a countercultural embrace of openness. Her ideas have rapidly gained influence, particularly among younger generations striving for authenticity in both personal and professional spheres.

Influential Theorists and Roots of Brown’s Work

Brown’s scholarship is deeply interwoven with and builds upon major figures in psychology and human development:

Carl Rogers: A pioneer of humanistic psychology and client-centered therapy, Rogers emphasized unconditional positive regard and the importance of authenticity and self-acceptance in personal growth. His work set a foundation for understanding the power of vulnerability in relationships and self-development.
Viktor Frankl: Known for logotherapy and his book Man’s Search for Meaning, Frankl explored the critical human drive for purpose and meaning—ideas echoed in Brown’s focus on connection as life’s true source of meaning.
John Bowlby: The father of attachment theory, Bowlby’s research illustrated how early bonds shape our capacity for connection, trust, and vulnerability—a notion that Brown centers in her exploration of belonging and shame.
Alfred Adler: Adler’s work on inferiority, social connectedness, and the drive for significance deeply influenced subsequent understandings of resilience and self-worth, both of which are central to Brown’s research on shame and courage.
Harriet Lerner: A prominent psychologist and author on topics of shame and connection, Lerner helped shine a light on the role these experiences play in our sense of self and in relationships.

In the contemporary era, Kristin Neff—a psychologist and leading researcher on self-compassion—has also contributed to our understanding of the imperative for kindness towards oneself, a concept that complements Brown’s prescriptions for overcoming shame.

Brown’s Impact and Legacy

By fusing rigorous academic research with relatable storytelling, Brené Brown has made vulnerability, honesty, and emotional courage central tenets of modern leadership, organizational culture, and personal development. Her books, podcasts, and talks are credited with igniting global conversations about mental and emotional health—a legacy that continues to resonate through businesses, educational institutions, and social movements. Often described as offering “data with soul”, Brown’s work is both a call and a roadmap for embracing the fullness of our humanity, trusting that only by facing our darkness can we unlock the infinite power of our own light.

Term: Grounded theory

Grounded theory is a systematic qualitative research methodology that focuses on developing theories directly from empirical data rather than starting with preconceived hypotheses or theoretical frameworks. Unlike traditional research methods, which often test existing theories, grounded theory uses inductive reasoning: researchers gather data through interviews, observations, or documents and then analyse this data as it is collected, allowing patterns and concepts to emerge organically from within the data itself.

Key characteristics of grounded theory include:

Starting with data: The process begins by collecting rich, qualitative data about people’s behaviours, experiences, or interactions, often through close observation or interviews.
Coding and categorization: As data is gathered, researchers attach codes—succinct tags that capture important concepts—and continuously compare new data with what’s already been gathered, refining and grouping these codes into higher-level categories.
Theory building: Through repeated comparison and analysis, overarching patterns and themes are identified. These are eventually synthesized into a theory that is “grounded” in the data, reflecting the real-world complexities and variations captured by the researchers.
Flexible, iterative process: The methodology is dynamic and open-ended. Researchers may return to collect more data based on emerging insights, a practice known as theoretical sampling, continuing until theoretical saturation—when no new concepts are emerging.
Applicability: The resulting theories are intended to be directly relevant to the specific contexts studied, providing explanations and predictions that “fit” the lived realities of participants.

Origins and the Leading Theorists

Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss are the co-founders of grounded theory. Their influential 1967 book, The Discovery of Grounded Theory, challenged the prevailing logic of hypothesis-driven research. At that time, social sciences often relied on deductive approaches—establishing theoretical frameworks first, then collecting data to confirm or deny hypotheses. Glaser, a sociologist trained in quantitative methods, and Strauss, who brought a background in medical sociology and phenomenology, aimed to create an approach that would allow theory to arise from the complexity of real-life data without being constrained by prior assumptions.

Barney Glaser (b. 1930): Glaser’s academic roots lie in Columbia University, where he was deeply influenced by scholars such as Paul Lazarsfeld and Robert Merton. Glaser’s focus on comparative analysis and his work in quantitative methods informed the structured, systematic nature of grounded theory. After collaborating with Strauss, Glaser helped popularize grounded theory across various disciplines and later worked to preserve what he viewed as its original methodological rigor.
Anselm Strauss (1916–1996): Strauss studied at the University of Chicago, a centre for symbolic interactionism, and developed strong interests in the study of social processes, interaction, and meaning making. His background brought a sensitivity to participant perspectives that became central to grounded theory. Later, Strauss—along with Juliet Corbin—refined grounded theory’s procedures by formalizing open, axial, and selective coding, expanding practitioners’ tools for data analysis.

Their early collaboration stemmed from their joint study on terminal illness, documented in Awareness of Dying (1965), which provided both the empirical impetus and the methodological framework for grounded theory.

Legacy and Influence

Grounded theory’s influence has extended far beyond sociology, impacting fields such as psychology, health sciences, management, and education. Its flexibility, adaptability, and reliance on lived experience have made it a vital tool for uncovering complex social processes and for building theories that remain closely tied to real-world practice. Subsequent theorists such as Kathy Charmaz have further developed the approach by emphasizing the researcher’s interpretative role, leading to “constructivist grounded theory,” reflecting the ongoing evolution of this foundational qualitative methodology.

Quote: Jim Collins – Author, academic

“The most powerfully transformative executives possess a paradoxical mixture of personal humility and professional will. They are timid and ferocious. Shy and fearless. They are rare – and unstoppable.” – Jim Collins – Author, academic

Jim Collins, the author behind this quote, is a renowned figure in business thinking whose work has fundamentally shaped how organizations and leaders view greatness and transformation. Collins is best known for his ground-breaking research and best-selling books on business management, leadership, and organizational sustainability, with “Good to Great” standing out as a seminal text.

Jim Collins’ Backstory and Context of the Quote

Jim Collins began his professional journey with a Bachelor of Science in Mathematical Sciences from Stanford University, followed by an MBA from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. Early in his career, he worked at McKinsey & Company, where he witnessed first-hand the research that would underpin In Search of Excellence, one of the early classics in management literature.

His intellectual curiosity led him to academia, where he taught at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business and earned distinction for his contributions. It was during this period that Collins started asking probing questions: What sets truly great companies apart? How do ordinary organizations become exceptional? These explorations culminated in his influential research laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, where he worked with leaders from diverse sectors—corporate, non-profit, and even the military.

The featured quote exemplifies Collins’s insight from the “Level 5 Leadership” concept, introduced in Good to Great. Through extensive research, Collins and his team identified that the most transformative leaders combined personal humility with unwavering professional will. These leaders are not brash or self-aggrandizing; rather, their strength is paradoxical. They are both “timid and ferocious,” “shy and fearless,” embodying a rare blend of virtues that make them, as Collins notes, “unstoppable”. This philosophy challenged the then-prevailing myth that only charismatic, larger-than-life personalities could lead organizations to enduring success.

About Jim Collins

Jim Collins is recognized as a preeminent business thinker worldwide, having authored or co-authored six major works—including Built to Last, Good to Great, and How the Mighty Fall—that have collectively sold over ten million copies. Beyond his research and writing, Collins has worked as a consultant and teacher to executives in both the public and private sectors, and his influence extends far beyond academia. He has been shaped by mentorships with other leading thinkers, notably Peter Drucker, whom Collins has described as his greatest inspiration.

Leading Theorists Related to Transformative Leadership

The field of transformative and paradoxical leadership draws on a rich tradition of management thought:

Peter Drucker is considered the father of modern management and was a major influence on Collins. Drucker’s approach to management emphasized integrity, decentralization, and a focus on results rather than charisma or force of personality. Drucker’s writings, including The Practice of Management, underpin much of today’s thinking on leadership effectiveness and long-term organizational success.
Tom Peters and Robert Waterman were pivotal figures in developing the excellence movement with their book In Search of Excellence. Their research, which Collins encountered during his time at McKinsey, focused on the traits that distinguish high-performing organizations, including the importance of strong yet humble leadership.
Warren Bennis contributed significantly to leadership studies, particularly around authentic leadership—leaders who are self-aware, guided by values, and able to inspire trust and performance within teams.
John Kotter is known for his work on leading organizational change, emphasizing that effective transformational leaders create a sense of urgency, craft a vision, and empower others—a framework that complements Collins’s observations on humility and will.
James MacGregor Burns introduced the concept of transformational leadership, describing leaders who motivate followers by raising their level of morality and motivation, echoing Collins’s findings about humility and aspiration.

Legacy and Impact

The synthesis of personal humility and professional will continues to redefine what is expected of leaders in business and beyond. Collins’s insights have inspired executives and aspiring leaders to seek greatness not through ego or bravado, but through resilience, discipline, and a quiet but relentless drive for excellence. His ongoing contributions keep shaping new generations of leaders in pursuit of not just success, but true and enduring greatness.

Quote: Shannon L. Alder – Author, therapist

“You have two choices in life when it comes to truthful observations by others that anger you: You can be ashamed and cover it up by letting your pride take you in the extreme opposite direction, in order to make the point that they are wrong. Or, you can break down the walls of pride by accepting vulnerability as a strength, not a weakness. As you walk through your vulnerability, you will meet humility on the way to courage. From here, courage allows us to let go of shame and rise higher into the person we are meant to be, not the person that needs to be right. This is the road to confidence and self worth.” – Shannon L. Alder – Author, therapist

Shannon L. Alder is an American inspirational author and therapist known for her practical wisdom and deeply empathetic approach to personal growth and relationships. Born in New Mexico in 1970, Alder has built a reputation as a widely quoted writer, with her insights appearing in over 300 books by other authors and extensive online publications. Her works include bestsellers like 300 Questions to Ask Your Parents Before It’s Too Late, 300 Questions LDS Couples Should Ask Before Marriage, and The Narcissistic Abuse Recovery Bible, among others.

Alder’s writing is renowned for its direct, nurturing style that invites readers to confront personal truths and seek healing without shame. She draws from her dual experience as a therapist—specializing in recovery from emotional and narcissistic abuse—and as someone who has herself faced and overcome adversity. This combination gives her a unique authority and compassion for the complexities of vulnerability, humility, and courage.

Alder is also known for her “Shannonisms”—aphoristic expressions and bite-sized reflections that circulate widely on social media and in motivational literature. Her focus on vulnerability as a strength, not a weakness, is a cornerstone of her message. She encourages readers to see the act of opening oneself to discomfort and critique as an entry point not to shame, but to authentic self-worth and confidence.

Context of the Quote

The featured quote is drawn from Alder’s exploration of how individuals respond to truthful, sometimes uncomfortable observations from others. She contrasts two paths:

One is the instinct to react defensively, allowing pride to shield us by rejecting or countering criticism.
The other is to dismantle pride and embrace vulnerability, which is not self-defeat but the groundwork for genuine humility.

Alder suggests that “as you walk through your vulnerability, you will meet humility on the way to courage.” In this philosophy, humility is not about humiliation but about openness to growth. With humility comes courage—the courage to release shame and become the person one is truly meant to be, rather than someone fixated on being right. The result is true confidence and self-worth, achieved through acceptance and transformation rather than avoidance or denial.

Leading Theorists and Intellectual Context

While Shannon L. Alder’s work is highly personal and practical, her ideas align with and echo several major theorists in psychology and personal development:

Theorist	Contribution
Brené Brown	Central to modern understanding of vulnerability. In her landmark research, Brown frames vulnerability as the birthplace of courage, creativity, and belonging—paralleling Alder’s emphasis on embracing vulnerability to develop courage and self-worth.
Carl Rogers	Developer of person-centered therapy, Rogers highlighted the importance of authenticity, genuineness, and unconditional positive regard. He believed true growth happens when people accept themselves without pretense—ideas mirrored in Alder’s advocacy for vulnerability as transformative.
Tara Brach	As a psychologist and teacher, Brach’s work on radical acceptance and self-compassion resonates with Alder’s encouragement to let go of shame and move toward genuine self-acceptance and confidence.
Kristin Neff	Pioneered research on self-compassion, which involves treating oneself with kindness during failures and inadequacies—a prerequisite for the humility and courage Alder describes.

Alder’s insights are thus part of a rich tradition that challenges ingrained beliefs about strength, urging us to see openness, humility, and self-reflection as the true sources of personal growth and leadership.

Summary of the Insight

Shannon L. Alder invites us to reconsider our reflex to defend pride and instead walk courageously through vulnerability. The journey she describes is not merely personal but universal—one that has been explored by leading minds in psychology and embraced in modern thinking about what it means to live authentically and lead with empathy. Her words serve as both comfort and call to action: to value truth, abandon defensive pride, and step into the ever-rising cycle of humility, courage, and self-worth

Term: Relational humility

Relational humility is the capacity to recognize the limits of your own perspective and to value the experiences, insights, and feelings of others, especially within interpersonal relationships. It means understanding that your view is only one among many, fostering deeper connection and genuine dialogue instead of prioritizing pride or the need to be ‘right’. Unlike self-deprecation or meekness, relational humility is an active openness—it is not about diminishing your worth but rather acknowledging that everyone’s contributions matter.

Key characteristics of relational humility:

Listening before asserting: Taking time to understand others’ viewpoints, even when they conflict with your own.
Admitting mistakes: Being willing to own your errors and shortcomings instead of defending them out of pride.
Letting go of superiority: Recognizing that your knowledge or status does not make you inherently better than others.
Prioritizing relationships over ego: Making decisions with the health of the relationship in mind, rather than letting pride dictate your actions.

Relational humility in the business setting is a powerful and necessary asset that directly contributes to superior individual and organizational performance. In the workplace, relational humility is the willingness of leaders and team members to admit limitations, value diverse contributions, and maintain authentic, open communication—even when doing so might challenge one’s ego or established authority.

Why is relational humility so valuable in business?

Builds trust and credibility: Employees are more likely to trust and follow leaders who demonstrate humility—by owning mistakes, valuing others’ input, and being approachable. This trust is foundational to high-performing teams and sustainable results.
Fosters collaboration and innovation: Relational humility encourages the free flow of ideas and feedback. Team members feel respected and motivated to contribute, leading to creative solutions and collective achievement.
Creates psychological safety: When leaders and colleagues admit they don’t have all the answers and are open to feedback, it signals safety to others. This psychological safety allows employees to take risks, share candidly, and support one another—key factors in organizational resilience and adaptability.
Enables continuous learning: Humble professionals are more receptive to feedback and more willing to learn from mistakes or setbacks. This fosters a culture of growth and ongoing improvement, essential for navigating changing business environments.
Authenticity and engagement: Relational humility allows individuals to bring their true selves to work, which drives higher engagement, job satisfaction, and a sense of belonging. Leaders who are authentic foster loyalty and discretionary effort among their teams.

Relational humility is courageous and strategically right. In environments where competition and performance pressure are high, it takes courage to admit you might be wrong or that someone else has a better idea. But this courage sends a powerful message: that long-term results and genuine connection matter more than protecting one’s pride. Humility is not weakness; it is a strategic strength that enables better decision-making, attracts and retains talent, and positions organizations to thrive.

Relational humility also prevents the self-sabotage of pride. In business, burning bridges, refusing to listen, or failing to seek feedback can lead to missed opportunities, stalled careers, and organizational failure—the professional equivalent of “cutting one’s nose to spite one’s face.” By embracing humility, professionals keep doors open, nurture valuable networks, and create opportunities for reconciliation and growth.

Practicing relational humility is authentic leadership. Leaders who are humble empower their people, acknowledge their dependence on others, and create an environment where purpose and results align. Research shows that humble leaders are seen as more promotable, foster higher team morale, and build more resilient organizations.

“Humility is undeniably a key trait of effective leadership, essential for building trust, fostering collaboration, and driving sustained organizational success.”

Relational humility is both courageous and right, because it demands we put outcomes, relationships, and the greater good above ego. In business, as in life, it is the foundation for meaningful connection, authentic leadership, and lasting success.

Exemplification

Consider the classic example of someone who, after a falling out, refuses to reach out and mend the relationship. This person may feel justified in their anger or embarrassment, but their pride creates a barrier they cannot cross, leaving them isolated and unhappy—what’s often called “cutting one’s nose to spite one’s face.” Pride prevents them from apologizing or forgiving, leading to lost opportunities for reconciliation and happiness.

Conversely, relational humility is shown when someone swallows their pride to return and say, “I was wrong,” or “Can we start again?” It’s the parent embracing a child who has made grave mistakes, or the friend who chooses understanding over holding a grudge. These choices often repair and deepen bonds, creating a richer, more resilient social fabric.

Consequences of Lacking Relational Humility

A lack of relational humility often results in burned bridges, ongoing conflict, and missed opportunities for growth. Research shows people low in humility struggle to form and repair strong social bonds, which can lead to poorer emotional well-being and less support—ultimately impacting long-term health and happiness.

Theoretical Roots and Key Theorist

The most influential psychologist in this field is Dr. Everett L. Worthington, Jr. His Relational Humility Scale is widely used to measure this trait, and his published work frames relational humility as the ability to put the health and needs of the relationship above one’s own pride or desire for dominance.

Dr. Everett L. Worthington, Jr.

Biography: Dr. Worthington is an American psychologist and Professor Emeritus at Virginia Commonwealth University. Initially notable for his work in forgiveness research, he has written extensively about humility’s role in effective relationships and emotional health. The loss of his mother to a violent crime shaped his focus on reconciliation and humility—leading to his pioneering work on relational humility.
Contribution: Worthington’s research centers on how humility facilitates forgiveness and repair in relationships. He argues that relational humility is fundamental to resolving conflict, sustaining long-term bonds, and achieving personal growth.

If you find yourself miserable after burning bridges and unable to go back, know that relational humility is the key to change. By acknowledging your limitations, embracing vulnerability, and reaching out, you can rebuild connections and enrich your life. Pride may keep you stuck, but humility opens the door to healing and new beginnings.

Quote: R.D. Laing – Scottish psychiatrist

“The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice. And because we fail to notice that we fail to notice, there is little we can do to change; until we notice how failing to notice shapes our thoughts and deeds.” – R.D. Laing – Scottish psychiatrist

The quote is among the most incisive observations made by R. D. Laing, a Scottish psychiatrist whose work fundamentally reshaped how the world understands mental health, perception, and consciousness.

This reflection appears in Daniel Goleman’s Vital Lies, Simple Truths, a seminal work on the psychology of self-deception and the mechanisms by which individuals and institutions hide painful truths from themselves. Goleman’s book explores how the human mind deploys subtle avoidance strategies, not merely to escape uncomfortable realities, but to shield entire frameworks of thought from scrutiny. Laing’s insight captures the paradox that the greatest limitations on our freedom and awareness stem from that which remains invisible to us—not out of malice or ignorance, but precisely because the act of not noticing is itself unnoticed.

Laing’s statement addresses a core theme in Vital Lies, Simple Truths: the mental blind spots that arise from habitual thinking, cultural conditioning, and social pressures. Only by cultivating awareness of these patterns can individuals or organizations begin to expand their potential for change and adaptation.

R. D. Laing: The Person Behind the Quote

Ronald David Laing (1927–1989) was a British psychiatrist whose career challenged the mainstream conventions of psychiatry, particularly in the treatment and understanding of schizophrenia. He emerged as a leading voice in what was labeled the “anti-psychiatry” movement (though Laing himself rejected this term). Rather than viewing psychosis as a biological flaw to be chemically or physically corrected, Laing argued that “madness” was often a meaningful—if deeply troubled—response to untenable situations, usually within the structure of the family or society.

Laing was deeply influenced by existentialist and phenomenologist philosophers such as Nietzsche, Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Jaspers, and Merleau-Ponty. He believed that the lived experience of the patient—what they perceived, thought, and felt—was central, and should be taken seriously as an expression of existential reality. In his explorations, Laing even traveled to Asia to study Buddhist meditation, seeking insights into the nature of consciousness and the boundaries of perception.

Laing’s clinical innovations included his willingness to simply sit with deeply disturbed patients, listening without preconceptions and attempting to understand the “existential truth” behind their symptoms. He rejected the prevailing emphasis on physical treatments such as electroshock and lobotomy, advocating for a more humane, attentive, and socially aware psychiatry.

Theoretical Foundations and Leading Thinkers

Laing’s work was at the intersection of multiple influential currents:

Harry Stack Sullivan: Emphasized interpersonal relationships in shaping mental health, influencing Laing to seek real (not merely imagined) sources of psychological distress.
Gregory Bateson: Developed the “double bind” theory, positing that schizophrenia can arise from chronic exposure to contradictory messages, particularly in families. Laing built on this by suggesting that psychotic speech and behavior are attempts to communicate otherwise unutterable distress.
Karl Jaspers: While Jaspers deemed many symptoms “un-understandable,” Laing countered by insisting that even the most bizarre expressions of mental illness had personal and social meaning.
Michel Foucault and David Cooper: Fellow critics of mainstream psychiatry, these thinkers argued that the construction of “madness” is shaped by historical, social, and political forces.

Together, these theorists challenged the reduction of mental suffering to mere biochemical imbalance, insisting on the complex interplay between individual perception, family structure, social context, and culture.

The Subject’s Lasting Impact

Laing’s approach—and the insight captured in the quote—remains vital today, not just in psychiatry but in any domain where awareness, self-limitation, and the unseen forces shaping behaviour are of concern. His work underscores the necessity of noticing our own blind spots, because only from that awareness can meaningful change originate. The journey toward transformation, personally or collectively, begins with “noticing what we fail to notice”—and recognizing how our unnoticed frames of reference define what we believe is possible.

Term: Self Awareness

Self-awareness is the capacity to consciously recognize, observe, and understand one’s own feelings, thoughts, motives, and behaviours as they arise. It involves stepping back to notice your internal world—your emotions, thoughts, physical sensations, and urges—which often operate outside of conscious attention. This reflective process can be simple, such as noticing the feelings you have in different social situations, or more complex, such as understanding how your thoughts and emotions interact and influence your behaviour over time.

Key aspects of self-awareness include:

Recognizing personal strengths and challenges: Self-aware individuals see both their abilities and areas for improvement, which supports personal growth.
Understanding how actions affect others: Beyond self-knowledge, self-awareness extends to perceiving how others view us, allowing for better relationship management and social interactions.
Developing self-consciousness: At higher levels, self-awareness includes understanding oneself from both a first-person and a third-person viewpoint—the realization that others have perspectives on us, too.
Foundation for growth: Self-awareness is considered the first step toward change, self-improvement, and mental well-being, as you cannot alter what you do not understand.

Daniel Goleman: Theorist and Author

Daniel Goleman is widely regarded as a leading authority on self-awareness and its importance in personal and professional development. A psychologist, journalist, and author, Goleman popularized the concept of emotional intelligence (EQ), of which self-awareness is a fundamental component.

Goleman’s 1985 book, “Vital Lies, Simple Truths”, delves deeply into the mechanisms of self-deception—the ways we avoid confronting uncomfortable truths about ourselves—and how this impedes self-awareness and, subsequently, genuine personal growth. In the book, he explores the psychological defenses that cloud our objective self-perception:

“The mind’s greatest challenge is to see itself without distortion, to maintain the delicate balance between facing difficult realities and sustaining a sense of hope and coherence.”

Goleman’s analysis makes the case that self-awareness is both essential and challenging, as our minds are wired to sometimes shield us from harsh realities. By bringing these mechanisms to light, Goleman offers strategies to enhance self-awareness, emphasizing the benefits of honest introspection for both individuals and organizations.

Goleman’s Biography and Relationship to Self-awareness

Daniel Goleman earned his Ph.D. in psychology from Harvard University, after which he spent many years as a science journalist for The New York Times, reporting on brain and behavioural research. His influential work on emotional intelligence, beginning with his best-selling book “Emotional Intelligence” (1995), reshaped how leaders, companies, and individuals think about personal and social competence. Goleman’s academic rigor, combined with his skill in making psychological concepts accessible, established him as the primary theorist linking self-awareness and emotional intelligence.

Goleman’s insights into self-awareness have had a profound impact on leadership theory, psychotherapy, education, and workplace training, emphasizing that truly understanding oneself is the cornerstone for developing every other aspect of emotional intelligence. His work—especially as detailed in “Vital Lies, Simple Truths”—remains foundational for anyone seeking to understand or improve their own self-awareness and psychological well-being.

Quote: Fyodor Dostoevsky – Russian novelist, philosopher, and journalist

“There are other things which a man is afraid to tell even to himself, and every decent man has a number of such things stored away in his mind.” – Fyodor Dostoyevsky – Notes from Underground

Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground (1864) is a foundational text of existential literature, probing the paradoxes and inner conflicts of human consciousness. The quote is spoken by the novella’s unnamed protagonist, the Underground Man—a figure marked by hyperawareness, self-loathing, and paralyzing introspection. This sentence illustrates one of Dostoevsky’s core insights: the depth of human self-deception and the layers of secret shame and fear that even the most honest individuals conceal from themselves.

Notes from Underground was Dostoevsky’s response to the growing intellectual currents of rational egoism and utopian optimism in 19th-century Russia. Through the internal monologue of the Underground Man, Dostoevsky warns against the dangers of reducing human nature to tidy scientific or logical schemes. He argues that consciousness can become a torment when it turns inward, endlessly dissecting motives, memories, and desires. The narrator is both acutely self-conscious and incapable of action, trapped in a cycle of self-reflection and spite, which he describes as a kind of illness.

Context of the Quote

This passage reflects Dostoevsky’s belief in the complexity and contradiction at the heart of human psychology. The idea that each person hides certain thoughts even from themselves speaks to the unconscious mind’s power and the defense mechanisms we deploy to protect ourselves from uncomfortable truths. For Dostoevsky, true self-knowledge is painful and, therefore, often avoided; we construct elaborate rationalizations and illusions to mask our deeper uncertainties or shame. The Underground Man’s confession is both a critique and a mirror: in his vulnerability, he exposes a universal human tendency.

About Dostoevsky

Fyodor Dostoevsky (1821–1881) was a Russian novelist, philosopher, and journalist whose works explore the psychological and spiritual depths of his characters. A former political prisoner, Dostoevsky’s novels—including Crime and Punishment, The Brothers Karamazov, and Notes from Underground—delve into moral dilemmas, the nature of free will, and the search for meaning in a turbulent world. His insights into the shadowy corners of the human mind anticipate many of the ideas later developed in psychology and existential philosophy.

Related Theory: Daniel Goleman and Self-Deception

The themes Dostoevsky investigates find scientific elaboration in the work of Daniel Goleman. Goleman is a psychologist and journalist best known for popularizing the concept of emotional intelligence. His seminal book, Vital Lies, Simple Truths: The Psychology of Self-Deception (1985), synthesizes decades of research to explain why and how individuals, organizations, and even societies distort reality to avoid painful truths.

Vital Lies, Simple Truths: Core Ideas

Self-deception is not just a personal failing but an everyday survival strategy; it allows individuals to navigate anxieties and contradictions.
Goleman describes the psychological mechanisms—such as denial, rationalization, and selective attention—that enable people to protect their sense of self, even at the cost of truth.
His thesis echoes Dostoevsky’s insight: we all harbor “secret” beliefs or memories that remain just out of conscious reach, shaping our actions and relationships in subtle but profound ways.

Daniel Goleman: Background

Goleman trained as a psychologist at Harvard and merged academic rigor with journalistic clarity.
In Vital Lies, Simple Truths, he draws on research in cognitive science, psychoanalysis, and social psychology.
Goleman later introduced the world to Emotional Intelligence (1995), a groundbreaking concept that has influenced education, business, and therapy.

Intellectual Lineage and Perspective

Both Dostoevsky and Goleman are united in their skepticism toward claims of complete self-knowledge and their recognition that self-deception is an ingrained facet of being human. Dostoevsky frames it as tragic and inescapable, while Goleman provides a scientific explanation for its universality and necessity. Their combined perspectives invite us to consider that clarity about ourselves is a rare achievement—and perhaps, at times, an unbearable one.

Term: Self Deception

Self-deception is the act of denying, minimizing, or rationalizing away information, evidence, or logical arguments that challenge one’s existing beliefs, preferences, or self-image. At its core, self-deception involves convincing oneself of a truth—or the absence of a truth—in such a manner that it conceals uncomfortable self-knowledge. It is a psychological process where individuals deliberately or subconsciously avoid facing facts, often by distorting reality or ignoring disconfirming evidence. This can lead to holding motivated false beliefs that persist even in the presence of contradicting information. Self-deception ranges from conscious rationalizations to unconscious avoidance and forgetting, sometimes involving holding conflicting beliefs—one known to be true but suppressed, and another maintained at the surface.

Key aspects include:

Denial of reality: Refusing to acknowledge facts or logic that contradict self-perceptions or desired narratives.
Rationalization: Creating justifications or excuses to maintain comfort and stability in one’s worldview.
Suppression or avoidance: Keeping threatening truths out of conscious awareness, sometimes relegating them to the unconscious.

Self-deception can act as a defense mechanism for self-protection—shielding individuals from painful truths or threats to self-esteem. However, it is also linked to self-sabotage, as persistent denial of reality impairs judgment, relationships, and effective leadership. Research shows that self-deception is intertwined with memory and social status, and can be influenced by stress or situational pressures.

Daniel Goleman: The Strategist of Self-Deception

Daniel Goleman is widely recognized as a pivotal theorist in the study of self-deception, particularly through his influential book “Vital Lies, Simple Truths: The Psychology of Self-Deception.” Goleman, an American psychologist, author, and science journalist, gained international acclaim for his work on emotional intelligence but has made significant contributions to understanding how humans deceive themselves.

Biography:

Goleman earned his Ph.D. in psychology from Harvard, where he researched consciousness, emotion, and behavioral science.
As a science writer for The New York Times specializing in psychology and brain sciences, he brought complex psychological concepts to a broad audience.

Relationship to the Term:

In “Vital Lies, Simple Truths” (first published in 1985), Goleman explores the mechanisms and evolutionary roots of self-deception.
He argues that self-deception is not merely a personal failing but a pervasive aspect of the human mind, shaped by both individual psychology and social context.
Goleman details how self-deception operates at multiple levels—from individuals to organizations and cultures—often serving to reduce psychological distress but ultimately compromising awareness and effectiveness.

Goleman’s approach integrates insights from psychology, neuroscience, and social dynamics, illustrating how self-deception functions as both a protective strategy and a barrier to growth. His work remains foundational in understanding why people—and leaders especially—sometimes fail to see or admit critical truths, and how confronting self-deception is vital for personal development and organizational health.

By framing self-deception as a universal, adaptive, yet ultimately limiting human tendency, Goleman’s scholarship provides a strategic lens for advisors, leaders, and individuals seeking self-awareness and more effective decision-making.

Quote: Carl Jung – pioneering figure in psychology

“Everyone carries a shadow, and the less it is embodied in the individual’s conscious life, the blacker and denser it is. If an inferiority is conscious, one always has a chance to correct it… But if it is repressed and isolated from consciousness, it never gets corrected, and is liable to burst forth suddenly in a moment of unawareness.” – Carl Jung – pioneering figure in psychology

Jung described the shadow as the unconscious part of the personality that consists of repressed ideas, weaknesses, desires, instincts, and shortcomings—essentially the darker, hidden side of ourselves that the conscious ego does not identify with or wishes to deny. It is a “cognitive blind spot” within the psyche, representing aspects of the self that one is unaware of or rejects because they don’t fit with the socially acceptable or conscious self-image.

The quote explains that when these shadow aspects remain unconscious and repressed, they become “blacker and denser,” meaning they grow more intense and potentially destructive. Conscious awareness or acknowledgment of these inferiority feelings or shadow elements gives one the chance to address and integrate them, promoting psychological growth and balance.

Importance of Shadow Integration

Jung emphasized that the path to self-knowledge and individuation—the process of becoming a whole person—requires confronting and embracing the shadow. This is often painful and challenging because it involves recognizing traits, desires, or impulses we typically deny. However, doing so prevents these shadow elements from erupting uncontrollably or damagingly, as they might if suppressed too long.

Jung wrote that the shadow is not solely negative but contains valuable qualities such as instincts, emotional energy, creativity, and realistic insights, which can be reclaimed through awareness. If left unrecognized, the shadow keeps a person psychologically impoverished and disconnected.

Carl Jung’s Background

Carl Gustav Jung (1875–1961) was a pioneering figure in psychology who diverged from Freud to develop his own theories about the unconscious mind. He introduced terms such as archetypes, the collective unconscious, and the personal unconscious, with the shadow being a central archetype representing the hidden dimension of personality.

His work has deeply influenced not only psychology but also philosophy, literature, and spirituality. Jung’s exploration of the shadow was part of his broader interest in the balance of conscious and unconscious parts of the self, aiming for personal wholeness.

In Summary

The shadow represents the unconscious, repressed, often undesirable parts of ourselves.
If these parts are conscious, one can work on and correct them.
If they are repressed, they become more intense and may suddenly emerge in uncontrolled ways.
Jung saw acknowledging and integrating the shadow as essential to psychological health and self-realization.
The quote reflects Jung’s belief in the necessity of self-awareness and honesty to prevent the shadow from overwhelming the individual.

This quote encapsulates a key psychological insight from Jung’s analytical psychology, highlighting the importance of self-consciousness in managing the darker sides of human nature and achieving personal growth.

Term: Persona Inflation

Persona inflation, as defined by Carl Jung, refers to the psychological phenomenon where an individual becomes excessively identified with their persona—the social mask or role they present to the world—leading to an inflated sense of self that is cut off from deeper, more authentic layers of the psyche. The persona is the social mask we create to meet external expectations. When we identify with it—“I am the CEO, the star, the influencer”—the ego becomes inflated, cut off from shadow and Self.

Jung’s Concept of the Persona

Jung introduced the concept of the persona as the mask or identity we adopt to meet the expectations and norms of society. It acts as a kind of psychological armor, allowing us to function in social roles—such as the CEO, the star, or the influencer. However, this mask is not our true self; it is a construct designed to navigate external realities.

Backstory: How Persona Inflation Occurs

Identification with the Role: Over time, individuals may become so attached to their persona that they genuinely believe they are the role they play—confusing the mask with their essence. For example, someone who endlessly introduces themselves and behaves as “the visionary CEO” may start to believe this role encompasses their entire identity.
Ego Inflation: Jung described inflation as a state where the ego’s sense of self-importance grows disproportionately, disconnected from the rest of the psyche—including the shadow (our hidden, unacknowledged aspects) and the Self (a more integrated, whole identity). This happens when the ego merges with the persona or even with powerful archetypes, losing any humility or self-critique.
Blind Spots and Disconnection: An inflated persona blinds individuals to their own limitations, fallibility, and deeper needs. Jung noted such a person becomes egocentric and “conscious of nothing but its own existence,” unable to see their blind spots or relate authentically to others.

Symptoms and Societal Implications

Lack of Authentic Relationships: When the ego is wedded to its persona and inflated, it becomes difficult to form genuine connections, as interactions are filtered through the mask rather than the true self.
Vulnerability and Fragility: Like an overblown balloon, persona inflation is impressive but fragile; it is easily punctured by criticism, failure, or loss of status.
Denial of Humanness: This state serves as a defense against confronting one’s limitations, mistakes, or need for change—resulting in denial of one’s own humanity and incompleteness.
Societal Trends: In the modern era, pressure to project success and cultivate an idealized image—amplified by social media—makes persona inflation a widespread risk.

Jung’s Warning and the Path to Wholeness

Jung consistently warned about the dangers of inflation, emphasizing that it is not always consciously felt; often, its presence is best inferred from symptoms like arrogance, extreme defensiveness, or the reactions of others. The antidote lies in differentiating between the persona and the deeper Self, integrating unconscious elements, and maintaining humility. This ongoing process leads to greater psychological health and authentic living.

In summary, persona inflation is the over-identification with one’s social mask, resulting in an ego that is inflated and disconnected from one’s deeper self, relationships, and authentic human experience. Jung saw this as a common but perilous condition, especially prevalent in environments that reward surface performance over genuine self-knowledge

Quote: Jeffrey E. Young – the creator of schema therapy and a transformative figure in modern psychology

“You have to face the lifetrap head-on and understand it. Change also requires discipline. You have to systematically observe and change behaviors every day. Change cannot be hit-or-miss. It requires constant practice.” – Jeffrey E. Young – the creator of schema therapy and a transformative figure in modern psychology

Jeffrey Young developed schema therapy in response to the limitations he observed in traditional forms of cognitive behavioral therapy, particularly with clients experiencing chronic, deeply rooted emotional difficulties. After studying at Yale University and the University of Pennsylvania—and completing postdoctoral work under Aaron Beck, the father of CBT—Young realized that many people struggle with what he called “lifetraps,” now more widely known as early maladaptive schemas.These are enduring, self-defeating emotional and cognitive patterns established in childhood, usually due to unmet core emotional needs.

Young’s work led him to found the Schema Therapy Institute, where he and his colleagues developed integrative methods that blend cognitive, attachment, psychodynamic, and experiential approaches. Central to schema therapy is the insight that awareness alone isn’t enough—patients must actively and systematically challenge and change their ingrained reactions and beliefs. “Lifetraps” or schemas can’t be altered by insight alone; they demand disciplined, daily effort to observe one’s thoughts and behaviors and to practice new, healthier ways of responding to life’s challenges.

This quote distills Young’s belief that enduring change is a process, not a single event: it requires direct confrontation with one’s schemas, daily self-observation, disciplined practice, and persistence. The path to change, as Young outlines in both his professional texts (Schema Therapy) and his bestselling self-help book (Reinventing Your Life), is structured, intentional, and ongoing—a philosophy that has helped millions worldwide recognize and heal their deepest emotional wounds.

Leading with EMS or Leading Those with EMS

In leadership and workplace settings, understanding EMS has profound implications. Leaders with unaddressed schemas may unconsciously enact patterns such as perfectionism, avoidance, mistrust, or overcompensation, which can undermine their effectiveness and harm team dynamics. For instance, a leader with an “unrelenting standards” schema might push themselves and their team too hard, causing burnout and resentment. Conversely, an “abandonment” schema might result in over-accommodation or difficulty setting boundaries, diminishing authority and clarity.

Leading individuals with EMS requires attunement, clear boundaries, and consistent, compassionate communication. It is important to recognize when an employee’s reactions may stem from deep-seated patterns rather than surface-level conflicts or incompetence. Effective leaders:

Provide structured feedback and clear expectations.
Model emotional regulation and transparency.
Encourage open dialogue about challenges and stressors.
Offer support for professional development that includes emotional intelligence and self-awareness.
Avoid reinforcing negative schemas through punitive, inconsistent, or excessively critical management styles.

Leaders who are aware of EMS—in themselves and in others—can foster a work environment that supports psychological growth, resilience, and healthy relational patterns. This not only improves individual well-being but also enhances collective performance, creativity, and loyalty. Ultimately, addressing EMS in the workplace is about creating a culture where people can move beyond self-defeating patterns and realize their full potential, both individually and as part of a team

About Jeffrey Young

Jeffrey E. Young (born 1950) is a renowned American psychologist best known for developing schema therapy and founding the Schema Therapy Institute.
He trained at Yale University and the University of Pennsylvania under Aaron Beck, and became deeply interested in helping clients with persistent problems not fully addressed by traditional therapies.
His approach revolutionized therapy for those with personality disorders, chronic depression, and long-standing relationship patterns, opening new avenues for psychological healing through an emphasis on self-discipline, daily practice, and compassion.
Young’s books, including Schema Therapy and Reinventing Your Life, have become primary resources for both professionals and the general public, making the process of facing and changing fundamental life patterns widely accessible.

This quote embodies the core message and method of schema therapy: change is possible, but only through purposeful, disciplined, and sustained action.

Term: Early Maladaptive Schemas

Early maladaptive schemas are deeply ingrained patterns of thinking and feeling about oneself and one’s relationships, originating in childhood or adolescence and persisting into adulthood in dysfunctional way. The concept is foundational to Schema Therapy, introduced and developed by psychologist Jeffrey Young in the 1990s. Young and colleagues defined these schemas as “broad, pervasive themes regarding oneself and one’s relationship with others, developed during childhood and elaborated throughout one’s lifetime, and dysfunctional to a significant degree.”

Backstory and Major Analysts

Jeffrey Young is the primary analyst who identified and categorized early maladaptive schemas, integrating elements from cognitive-behavioral, attachment, psychodynamic, and gestalt models into Schema Therapy.
Subsequent researchers and clinicians (e.g., Mason, Platts & Tyson) have expanded on Young’s work, exploring how negative relational experiences and early childhood traumas contribute to the development of specific schemas.
Schema Theory now occupies a central role in understanding how adverse childhood experiences—such as abandonment, criticism, abuse, or neglect—lead to persistent, self-defeating beliefs and emotional patterns.

How This Plays Out in Life

The effects of early maladaptive schemas permeate multiple domains:

Life and Choice

Individuals may repeatedly make decisions based on underlying beliefs like “I am unworthy” or “others will always leave me,” which can unconsciously guide life choices towards confirming these beliefs.
For example, someone with an abandonment schema may avoid close relationships or, conversely, cling to unsafe partners, fearing inevitable loss.

Relationships

Schemas such as mistrust/abuse, defectiveness/shame, or emotional deprivation often lead people to expect disappointment or mistreatment from others, causing patterns of withdrawal, conflict, or unhealthy attachment.
These beliefs can trigger maladaptive interpersonal styles, influencing the ability to form healthy bonds or communicate effectively.

Careers and Work

Unrelenting standards and self-sacrifice schemas may drive individuals to perfectionism or chronic overwork, while also undermining self-esteem and satisfaction.
Early maladaptive schemas are linked to workplace anxiety, depressive symptoms, and a reduced sense of self-efficacy, which may hinder performance and well-being.

Illustration with Examples

A psychology student who experienced critical parenting may develop an unrelenting standards schema, perpetually pushing themselves out of fear they will never measure up. In relationships, a history of emotional neglect may result in a social isolation schema, prompting avoidance of social connection and reinforcing loneliness.

Schema Therapy aims to identify these schemas and shift the underlying patterns, promoting healthier ways of thinking and relating to oneself and others.

In summary: Early maladaptive schemas are enduring, self-defeating patterns shaped by early adversity, described and categorized by Jeffrey Young and other schema therapy analysts. They have far-reaching effects on personal choices, relationships, careers, and psychological health, underpinning many persistent emotional and behavioral problems throughout life

Quote: Peter Senge – The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization

“Today’s problems come from yesterday’s ‘solutions.’” – Peter Senge – The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization

Senge’s law encapsulates a key insight from systems thinking: the unintended consequences of solutions, especially those that address only symptoms rather than root causes, can generate even greater problems over time.

Senge illustrates this principle with vivid examples and analogies. For instance, he recounts the story of a canoer trapped in a swirling backwash at the foot of a dam: the canoer’s instinctive but misguided efforts to fight the current only make matters worse. The only path to safety is a counterintuitive one—diving down, rather than struggling at the surface. This metaphor captures how intuitive, short-term problem-solving often intensifies the underlying, systemic issues.

The broader point Senge makes is that organizations (and people) often rely on quick fixes—what he calls “symptomatic solutions”—that deliver temporary relief but fail to address the deeper forces shaping outcomes. For example, a business struggling with declining sales might launch aggressive discounting or cut costs. While these measures may provide a short-term boost, they can erode brand value or employee morale, creating new problems down the line. Over time, organizations find themselves trapped in cycles where yesterday’s fixes become the root of today’s difficulties.

Senge’s insight is that “structures of which we are unaware hold us prisoner.” Without a systems perspective, leaders and teams repeatedly apply solutions that only reinforce problematic patterns, trapping organizations in cycles of recurring crises. Only by looking for underlying structures—feedback loops, delayed effects, and hidden interconnections—can organizations find lasting, transformative solutions.

Backstory on Peter Senge

Peter Senge is an American systems scientist, organizational theorist, and Senior Lecturer at MIT Sloan School of Management. He is internationally recognized for his pioneering work in organizational learning and systems thinking.

Senge’s reputation is founded on his landmark book, The Fifth Discipline (1990), where he introduced the concept of the “learning organization”—an entity capable not only of adapting to change but of continually transforming itself by learning at every level. He identifies five “disciplines” necessary for creating such organizations:

Personal Mastery: Commitment to individual learning and self-development.
Mental Models: Surfacing and challenging ingrained assumptions and beliefs.
Building Shared Vision: Creating collective commitment to a desired future.
Team Learning: Developing group capabilities for dialogue and collaborative problem-solving.
Systems Thinking: Understanding patterns, feedback loops, and the interconnectedness of organizational life.

Senge’s work synthesized insights from cybernetics, organizational development, and psychological research into a coherent framework for navigating complexity and change. His influence extends globally, shaping how leaders, organizations, and even educational institutions approach learning, adaptation, and long-term change.

Through his writing, teaching, and consulting, Senge has helped countless organizations recognize the pitfalls of linear thinking and reactive solutions, and guided them toward more holistic, systemic approaches to problem-solving and innovation.

Global Advisors | Quantified Strategy Consulting

“Today I choose courage over comfort.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller and professor

Share this:

Share this:

“Blame is simply the discharging of discomfort and pain. It has an inverse relationship with accountability. Blaming is a way that we discharge anger.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

The Person Behind the Quote: Brené Brown

Leading Theorists Related to Blame and Accountability

Share this:

Share this:

“Courage starts with showing up and letting ourselves be seen.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

Share this:

Related Strategy Theorist: Jon Kabat-Zinn

Backstory and Relationship to Mindfulness

Biography

Share this:

Context of the Quote

Influential Theorists and Roots of Brown’s Work

Brown’s Impact and Legacy

Share this:

Share this:

“The most powerfully transformative executives possess a paradoxical mixture of personal humility and professional will. They are timid and ferocious. Shy and fearless. They are rare – and unstoppable.” – Jim Collins – Author, academic

Share this:

Share this:

Exemplification

Consequences of Lacking Relational Humility

Theoretical Roots and Key Theorist

Dr. Everett L. Worthington, Jr.

Share this:

“The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice. And because we fail to notice that we fail to notice, there is little we can do to change; until we notice how failing to notice shapes our thoughts and deeds.” – R.D. Laing – Scottish psychiatrist

Share this:

Daniel Goleman: Theorist and Author

Goleman’s Biography and Relationship to Self-awareness

Share this:

“There are other things which a man is afraid to tell even to himself, and every decent man has a number of such things stored away in his mind.” – Fyodor Dostoyevsky – Notes from Underground

Share this:

Daniel Goleman: The Strategist of Self-Deception

Share this:

Importance of Shadow Integration

Carl Jung’s Background

In Summary

Share this:

Jung’s Concept of the Persona

Backstory: How Persona Inflation Occurs

Symptoms and Societal Implications

Jung’s Warning and the Path to Wholeness

Share this:

Leading with EMS or Leading Those with EMS

About Jeffrey Young

Share this:

Backstory and Major Analysts

How This Plays Out in Life

Illustration with Examples

Share this:

“Today’s problems come from yesterday’s ‘solutions.’” – Peter Senge – The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization

Share this:

Download brochure

Sign up for our newsletters - free