ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
An AI-native strategy firmGlobal Advisors: a consulting leader in defining quantified strategy, decreasing uncertainty, improving decisions, achieving measureable results.
A Different Kind of Partner in an AI World
AI-native strategy
consulting
Experienced hires
We are hiring experienced top-tier strategy consultants
Quantified Strategy
Decreased uncertainty, improved decisions
Global Advisors is a leader in defining quantified strategies, decreasing uncertainty, improving decisions and achieving measureable results.
We specialise in providing highly-analytical data-driven recommendations in the face of significant uncertainty.
We utilise advanced predictive analytics to build robust strategies and enable our clients to make calculated decisions.
We support implementation of adaptive capability and capacity.
Our latest
Thoughts
Global Advisors’ Thoughts: Who are you and what did you do with my team member?
By Marc Wilson
(Alternative titles could be: “Who are you and what did you do with the person I hired? “Who are you and what did you do with the boss who hired me?” “Who are you and what did you do with my client?” …)
Some years ago, a friend of many friends died tragically. I had never met Joe (not his real name) but often heard of him. He was exceptionally popular and well known. In fact, he was clearly loved by a huge group of people.
What followed Joe’s death was amazing. Hundreds of people went to a Facebook page and wrote of their sadness and memories of him. Many were personal, some merely referring to chance meetings and the incredible impression he had left on them. Some were even from people who had not met him, but were moved by his impact on people they knew.
One person wrote of meeting Joe at a party and how even though this was their first and only meeting, Joe had showed so much interest in her and interacted with her like an old friend. She had felt special – and left with an impression of how special Joe was.
Another wrote of a childhood cricket experience. He had played a blinding hook shot only to be caught by Joe at square leg in the crease of an arm. Joe had laughed and apologised repeatedly for accidentally catching him out off such good shot. Joe was secure with himself and the world and didn’t seem to need praise or undue accolades.
It was incredible. This was the type of person that most of us hope to be. Super-achiever, immensely popular, loving and loved. Years later, people still go back to that page and comment.
Joe committed suicide. It did not fit with …. Read more here: https://globaladvisors.biz/thoughts/20170601/who-are-you-and-what-did-you-do-with-my-team-member
Sign up to our email newsletters and receive Thoughts newsletters and others to your inbox! Ensure you don’t miss an update: go to https://globaladvisors.biz/subscribe-to-the-global-advisors-newsletters to sign up.
Strategy Tools
Strategy Tools: The Growth-Share Matrix
The Growth-Share Matrix was introduced almost 50 years ago by Bruce Henderson and the Boston Consulting Group (BCG). It is considered one of the most iconic strategic planning techniques.
The Growth-Share Matrix is a framework first developed in the 1960s to help companies think about the priority (and resources) that they should give to their different businesses. At the height of its success, in the late 1970s and early 1980s, the Growth-Share Matrix (or approaches based on it) was used by about half of all Fortune 500 companies, according to estimates.
The need which prompted The Growth-Share idea was, indeed, that of managing cash-flow. It was reasoned that one of the main indicators of cash generation was relative market share, and one which pointed to cash usage was that of market growth rate:
“To be successful, a company should have a portfolio of products with different growth rates and different market shares. The portfolio composition is a function of the balance between cash flows. High growth products require cash inputs to grow. Low growth products should generate excess cash. Both kinds are needed simultaneously.”—Bruce Henderson.
The two axes of the matrix are relative market share (or the ability to generate cash) and growth (or the need for cash).
For each product or service, the “area” of the circle represents the value of its sales. The growth–share matrix thus offers a “map” of the organization’s product (or service) strengths and weaknesses, at least in terms of current profitability, as well as the likely cashflows.
The matrix puts each of a firm’s businesses into one of four categories. The categories were all given memorable names – cash cow, star, dog and question mark – which helped to push them into the collective consciousness of managers all over the world.
Fast Facts
There is a positive relationship between long production run sizes and OEE
- Evidence suggests that longer run sizes lead to increased overall equipment effectiveness (OEE).
- OEE is a measure of how effectively manufacturing equipment is utilised and is defined as a product of machine availability, machine performance and product quality.
- Increasing run sizes improves availability as a result of less change over time, and performance as a result of less operator inefficiency.
- North America facilities that previously ran at world-class OEE rates, have experienced lower OEE rates due to a move towards reduced lot sizes and shifting large volume production overseas1.
- Shorter run sizes resulted in increased changeover frequency which led to increased planned downtime and reduced asset utilization.
- As a result OEE rates dropped from 85% to as low as 50%1.
Selected News
Quote: Jeremy Barnum – Executive VP and CFO of JP Morgan Chase
“We’re growing. We’re onboarding new clients. In many cases, I’m looking at some of my colleagues on the corporate and investment bank, the growth in new clients comes with lending. That lending is relatively low returning then you eventually get other business. So yes, that’s an example of an investment today that as it matures, has higher returns.” – Jeremy Barnum – Executive VP & CFO of JP Morgan Chase
Jeremy Barnum, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of JPMorgan Chase, shared this perspective during a strategic framework and firm overview executive Q&A on 24 February 2026. His remarks underscore a core tenet of modern banking: initial client acquisition often demands upfront investments in low-margin activities like lending, which pave the way for higher-return opportunities as relationships mature.[SOURCE]
Barnum’s career trajectory exemplifies the blend of analytical rigour and strategic foresight essential for leading one of the world’s largest financial institutions. Joining JPMorgan Chase in 2007 as a managing director in treasury and risk management, he ascended rapidly through roles in investor relations and corporate development. By 2021, he was appointed CFO, succeeding Jennifer Piepszak, who transitioned to co-CEO of the commercial and investment bank. Under Barnum’s stewardship, JPMorgan has navigated volatile markets, including the acquisition of Goldman Sachs’ Apple Card portfolio, which contributed to a $2.2 billion pre-tax credit reserve build in Q4 2025, even as net income reached $13 billion and revenue climbed 7% to $46.8 billion.1
In the broader context of this quote, Barnum was addressing investor concerns about growth dynamics in the corporate and investment banking (CIB) division. New client onboarding frequently begins with lending – a relatively low-return activity due to compressed margins and credit risks – but evolves into a fuller ecosystem of services, including advisory, trading, and capital markets activities that deliver superior profitability over time. This ‘investment today for returns tomorrow’ model aligns with JPMorgan’s 2026 expense projections of $105 billion, driven by ‘structural optimism’ and the imperative to invest in technology, AI, and competitive positioning against fintech challengers like Revolut and SoFi, as well as traditional rivals like Charles Schwab.1
The discussion occurred against a backdrop of heightened competitive and regulatory pressures. Just weeks earlier, in January 2026, Barnum warned of the perils of President Donald Trump’s proposed 10% cap on credit card interest rates, arguing it would curtail credit access for higher-risk borrowers – ‘the people who need it the most’ – and force lenders to scale back operations in a fiercely competitive landscape.2,3 Consumer and community banking revenue rose 6% year-over-year to $19.4 billion, bolstered by 7% growth in card services, yet such policies threaten this momentum. JPMorgan’s tech budget is set to surge by $2 billion to $19.8 billion in 2026, emphasising investments to maintain primacy.5
Leading theorists on relationship banking and client lifecycle management provide intellectual foundations for Barnum’s approach. Jay R. Ritter, a pioneer in IPO and capital-raising research at the University of Florida, has long documented how initial public offerings often underperform short-term but enable firms to access deeper capital markets over time – a parallel to banking’s lending-to-ecosystem progression. Similarly, Arnoud W.A. Boot, a professor at the University of Amsterdam and ECB Shadow Monetary Policy Committee member, theorises in works like ‘Relationship Banking and the Death of the Middleman’ (2000) that banks derive sustained value from ‘household-specific’ information built through ongoing relationships, transforming low-margin entry points into high-return sticky business.
Robert M. Townsend, Caltech economist and Nobel laureate (2011, with Finn Kydland), extends this through his incomplete contracting models, showing how banks mitigate asymmetric information via repeated interactions, justifying upfront lending as a commitment device for future profitability. More contemporarily, Viral V. Acharya of NYU Stern emphasises in IMF and BIS papers the ‘credit ecosystem’ where initial low-yield loans signal credibility, unlocking cross-selling in a post-2008 regulatory environment marked by Basel III capital constraints. These frameworks validate JPMorgan’s strategy: lending as the ‘hook’ in a maturing client portfolio amid rising competition and policy risks.
Barnum’s comments, delivered mere hours before this analysis (on 25 February 2026), reflect real-time strategic clarity. As JPMorgan projects resilience in consumer and small business segments, this philosophy positions the firm to convert today’s investments into enduring leadership.1,4
References
1. https://fortune.com/2026/01/14/jpmorgan-ceo-cfo-staying-competitive-requires-investment/
2. https://www.businessinsider.com/jpmorgan-warning-on-credit-card-cap-interest-2026-1
3. https://neworleanscitybusiness.com/blog/2026/01/13/jpmorgan-credit-card-rate-cap-warning/
5. https://www.aol.com/news/jpmorgan-spend-almost-20-billion-000403027.html

Polls
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Services
Global Advisors is different
We help clients to measurably improve strategic decision-making and the results they achieve through defining clearly prioritised choices, reducing uncertainty, winning hearts and minds and partnering to deliver.
Our difference is embodied in our team. Our values define us.
Corporate portfolio strategy
Define optimal business portfolios aligned with investor expectations
BUSINESS UNIT STRATEGY
Define how to win against competitors
Reach full potential
Understand your business’ core, reach full potential and grow into optimal adjacencies
Deal advisory
M&A, due diligence, deal structuring, balance sheet optimisation
Global Advisors Digital Data Analytics
14 years of quantitative and data science experience
An enabler to delivering quantified strategy and accelerated implementation
Digital enablement, acceleration and data science
Leading-edge data science and digital skills
Experts in large data processing, analytics and data visualisation
Developers of digital proof-of-concepts
An accelerator for Global Advisors and our clients
Join Global Advisors
We hire and grow amazing people
Consultants join our firm based on a fit with our values, culture and vision. They believe in and are excited by our differentiated approach. They realise that working on our clients’ most important projects is a privilege. While the problems we solve are strategic to clients, consultants recognise that solutions primarily require hard work – rigorous and thorough analysis, partnering with client team members to overcome political and emotional obstacles, and a large investment in knowledge development and self-growth.
Get In Touch
16th Floor, The Forum, 2 Maude Street, Sandton, Johannesburg, South Africa
+27114616371



