Select Page

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

An AI-native strategy firm

Global Advisors: a consulting leader in defining quantified strategy, decreasing uncertainty, improving decisions, achieving measureable results.

Learn MoreGlobal Advisors AI

A Different Kind of Partner in an AI World

AI-native strategy
consulting

Experienced hires

We are hiring experienced top-tier strategy consultants

Quantified Strategy

Decreased uncertainty, improved decisions

Global Advisors is a leader in defining quantified strategies, decreasing uncertainty, improving decisions and achieving measureable results.

We specialise in providing highly-analytical data-driven recommendations in the face of significant uncertainty.

We utilise advanced predictive analytics to build robust strategies and enable our clients to make calculated decisions.

We support implementation of adaptive capability and capacity.

Our latest

Thoughts

Global Advisors’ Thoughts: Is insecurity behind that dysfunction?

Global Advisors’ Thoughts: Is insecurity behind that dysfunction?

By Marc Wilson
Marc is a partner at Global Advisors and based in Johannesburg, South Africa

Download this article at http://www.globaladvisors.biz/inc-feed/20170907/thoughts-is-insecurity-behind-that-dysfunction

We tend to characterise insecurity as what we see in overtly fragile, shy and awkward people. We think that their insecurity presents as lack of confidence. And often we associate it with under-achievement.

Sometimes we might be aware that insecurities can lie behind the -ias, -isms and the phobias. Body dysmorphia? Insecurity about attractiveness. Racism? Often the need to find security by claiming superiority, belonging to group with power, a group you understand and whose acceptance you want. Homophobia? Often insecurity about one’s own sexuality or masculinity / feminity.

So it is often counter-intuitive when we discover that often behind incredible success lies – insecurity! In fact, an article I once read described the successful elite of strategy consulting firms as typically “insecure over-achievers.”

Insecurity must be one of the most misunderstood drivers of dysfunction. Instead we see its related symptoms and react to those. “That woman is so overbearing. That guy is so aggressive! That girl is so self-absorbed. That guy is so competitive.” Even, “That guy is so arrogant.”

How is it that someone we might perceive as competitive, arrogant or overconfident might be insecure? Sometimes people overcompensate to hide a weakness or insecurity. Sometimes in an effort to avoid feeling defensive of a perceived shortcoming, they might go on the offensive – telling people they are the opposite or even faking security.

Do we even know what insecurity is? The very need to…

Read the rest of “Power, Control and Space” at http://www.globaladvisors.biz/inc-feed/20170907/thoughts-is-insecurity-behind-that-dysfunction

read more

Strategy Tools

Strategy tools: Effective transfer pricing

Strategy tools: Effective transfer pricing

So much has been written about transfer pricing. Yet it remains a bone of contention in almost every organisation. Transfer pricing is not merely a rational challenge – it often raises the emotions of internal service users and providers who argue regarding scope, quality, price and value.

We have found that effective transfer pricing relies on some fairly simple best practices and critical success factors.

Many organisations recover costs as a regular ‘below-the-line’ deduction from operating division income statements. In our experience, charge out is almost always preferable. This results in internal value judgements and negotiation regarding delivery happening closer to time of use.

Internal prices / cost recovery plays a crucial role within an organisation: it ‘price signals’ to the buyer and the supplier of the service. Buyers make economic use decisions and suppliers make resource and capacity decisions. This fundamental function and consequence governs the optimal implementation of internal pricing / cost recovery.

We have typically seen that the realisation that internal pricing plays this role and the consequences of poor implementation are not well understood.

Results of poor transfer pricing implementation

Sub-optimal economic use decisions

Where costs / prices are higher than they should be, buyers pass this on as an inflated cost to their customers, experience margin squeeze, or utilise less of the service than they might have.
Strategically this can lead to incorrect decisions regarding the provision of services to the market and loss of market share.
Where costs / prices are lower than they should be, this can lead to overuse of a product or service and poor cost recovery from external customers.
Strategically this can result in the over promotion and sales of products and services that are achieving lower margins than thought, or that might even be making losses.

Sub-optimal investment and resourcing decisions

Incorrect pricing can lead to over- or under-investment in capacity and product or service quality. Further, the resourcing decisions will be incorrect should the price signal to the supplier be incorrect.

Political and emotional argument

Where buyers are unable to obtain assurance that an internal price is correct, there is typically resentment regarding the cost of the internal product and service and the sheltered position employees of the internal service provider occupy – in the buyer’s eyes free from commercial pressures.
Buyers and suppliers typically also argue regarding the quality of the service or product relative to the price paid.
Suppliers may react to criticism claiming their product or service is strategic in nature and refute its availability in the external markets.

Poor product / service quality

Poor price signals will result in lack of comparable product and service quality benchmarks. This can result in ‘gold-plating’ or poor-quality product and service provision.

Read more at https://globaladvisors.biz/2021/01/06/strategy-tools-effective-transfer-pricing/

read more

Fast Facts

Selected News

Quote: Dr. Fei-Fei Li – Stanford Professor – world-renowned authority in artificial intelligence

Quote: Dr. Fei-Fei Li – Stanford Professor – world-renowned authority in artificial intelligence

“I think robotics has a long way to go… I think the ability, the dexterity of human-level manipulation is something we have to wait a lot longer to get. ” – Dr. Fei-Fei Li – Stanford Professor – world-renowned authority in artificial intelligence

While AI has made dramatic progress in perception and reasoning, the physical manipulation and dexterity seen in human hands is far from being matched by machines.

Context of the Quote: The State and Limitations of Robotics

Dr. Li’s comment was made against the backdrop of accelerating investment and hype in artificial intelligence and robotics. While AI systems now master complex games, interpret medical scans, and facilitate large-scale automation, the field of robotics—especially with respect to dexterous manipulation and embodied interaction in the real world—remains restricted by hardware limitations, incomplete world models, and a lack of general adaptability.

  • Human dexterity involves fine motor control, real-time feedback, and a deep understanding of spatial and causal relationships. As Dr. Li emphasises, current robots struggle with tasks that are mundane for humans: folding laundry, pouring liquids, assembling diverse objects, or improvising repairs in unpredictable environments.
  • Even state-of-the-art robot arms and hands, controlled by advanced machine learning, manage select tasks in highly structured settings. Scaling to unconstrained, everyday environments has proven exceedingly difficult.
  • The launch of benchmarks such as the BEHAVIOR Challenge by Stanford, led by Dr. Li’s group, is a direct response to these limitations. The challenge simulates 1,000 everyday tasks across varied household environments, aiming to catalyse progress by publicly measuring how far the field is from truly general-purpose, dexterous robots.

Dr. Fei-Fei Li: Biography and Impact

Dr. Fei-Fei Li is a world-renowned authority in artificial intelligence, best known for foundational contributions to computer vision and the promotion of “human-centred AI”. Her career spans:

  • Academic Leadership: Professor of Computer Science at Stanford University; founding co-director of the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI (HAI).
  • ImageNet: Li created the ImageNet dataset, which transformed machine perception by enabling deep neural networks to outperform previous benchmarks and catalysed the modern AI revolution. This advance shaped progress in visual recognition, autonomous systems, and accessibility technologies.
  • Human-Centred Focus: Dr. Li is recognised for steering the field towards responsible, inclusive, and ethical AI, ensuring research aligns with societal needs and multidisciplinary perspectives.
  • Spatial Intelligence and Embodied AI: A core strand of her current work is in spatial intelligence—teaching machines to understand, reason about, and interact with the physical world with flexibility and safety. Her venture World Labs is pioneering this next frontier, aiming to bridge the gap from words to worlds.
  • Recognition: She was awarded the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering in 2025—alongside fellow AI visionaries—honouring transformative contributions to computing, perception, and human-centred innovation.
  • Advocacy: Her advocacy spans diversity, education, and AI governance. She actively pushes for multidisciplinary, transparent approaches to technology that are supportive of human flourishing.

Theoretical Foundations and Leading Figures in Robotic Dexterity

The quest for human-level dexterity in machines draws on several fields—robotics, neuroscience, machine learning—and builds on the insights of leading theorists:

Name
Contributions
Relevance to Dexterity Problem
Rodney Brooks
Developed subsumption architecture for mobile robots; founded iRobot and Rethink Robotics
Emphasised embodied intelligence: physical interaction is central; argued autonomous robots must learn in the real world and adapt to uncertainty.
Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, Yann LeCun
Deep learning pioneers; applied neural networks to perception
Led the transformation in visual perception and sensorimotor learning; current work extends to robotic learning but recognises that perception alone is insufficient for dexterity.
Pieter Abbeel
Expert in reinforcement learning and robotics (UC Berkeley)
Advanced algorithms for robotic manipulation, learning from demonstration, and real-world transfer; candid about the gulf between lab demonstrations and robust household robots.
Jean Ponce, Dieter Fox, Ken Goldberg
Leading researchers in computer vision and robot manipulation
Developed grasping algorithms and modelling for manipulation, but acknowledge that even “solved” tasks in simulation often fail in the unpredictable real world.
Dr. Fei-Fei Li
Computer vision, spatial intelligence, embodied AI
Argues spatial understanding and physical intelligence are critical, and that world models must integrate perception, action, and context to approach human-level dexterity.
Demis Hassabis
DeepMind CEO; led breakthroughs in deep reinforcement learning
AlphaZero and related systems have shown narrow superhuman performance, but the physical control and manipulation necessary for robotics remains unsolved.
Chris Atkeson
Humanoid and soft robotics pioneer
Developed advanced dexterous hands and whole-body motion, but highlights the vast gap between the best machines and human adaptability.

The Challenge: Why Robotics Remains “a Long Way to Go”

  • Embodiment: Unlike pure software, robots operate under real-world physical constraints. Variability in object geometry, materials, lighting, and external force must be mastered for consistent human-like manipulation.
  • Generalisation: A robot that succeeds at one task often fails catastrophically at another, even if superficially similar. Human hands, with sensory feedback and innate flexibility, effortlessly adapt.
  • World Modelling: Spatial intelligence—anticipating the consequences of actions, integrating visual, tactile, and proprioceptive data—is still largely unsolved. As Dr. Li notes, machines must “understand, navigate, and interact” with complex, dynamic environments.
  • Benchmarks and Community Efforts: The BEHAVIOR Challenge and open-source simulators aim to provide transparent, rigorous measurement and accelerate community progress, but there is consensus that true general dexterity is likely years—if not decades—away.

Conclusion: Where Theory Meets Practice

While AI and robotics have delivered astonishing advances in perception, narrowly focused automation, and simulation, the dexterity, adaptability, and common-sense reasoning required for robust, human-level robotic manipulation remain an unsolved grand challenge. Dr. Fei-Fei Li’s work and leadership define the state of the art—and set the aspirational vision for the next wave: embodied, spatially conscious AI, built with a profound respect for the complexity of human life and capability. Those who follow in her footsteps, across academia and industry, measure their progress not against hype or isolated demonstrations, but against the demanding reality of everyday human tasks.

read more

Polls

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Services

Global Advisors is different

We help clients to measurably improve strategic decision-making and the results they achieve through defining clearly prioritised choices, reducing uncertainty, winning hearts and minds and partnering to deliver.

Our difference is embodied in our team. Our values define us.

Corporate portfolio strategy

Define optimal business portfolios aligned with investor expectations

BUSINESS UNIT STRATEGY

Define how to win against competitors

Reach full potential

Understand your business’ core, reach full potential and grow into optimal adjacencies

Deal advisory

M&A, due diligence, deal structuring, balance sheet optimisation

Global Advisors Digital Data Analytics

14 years of quantitative and data science experience

An enabler to delivering quantified strategy and accelerated implementation

Digital enablement, acceleration and data science

Leading-edge data science and digital skills

Experts in large data processing, analytics and data visualisation

Developers of digital proof-of-concepts

An accelerator for Global Advisors and our clients

Join Global Advisors

We hire and grow amazing people

Consultants join our firm based on a fit with our values, culture and vision. They believe in and are excited by our differentiated approach. They realise that working on our clients’ most important projects is a privilege. While the problems we solve are strategic to clients, consultants recognise that solutions primarily require hard work – rigorous and thorough analysis, partnering with client team members to overcome political and emotional obstacles, and a large investment in knowledge development and self-growth.

Get In Touch

16th Floor, The Forum, 2 Maude Street, Sandton, Johannesburg, South Africa
+27114616371

Global Advisors | Quantified Strategy Consulting