Select Page

Due Diligence

Your due diligence is probably wrong

Global Advisors: a consulting leader in defining quantified strategy, decreasing uncertainty, improving decisions, achieving measureable results.

Learn MoreThe Global Advisors due diligence practice

Our latest perspective - What's behind under-performing listed companies?

Outperform through the downturn

Experienced hires

We are hiring experienced top-tier strategy consultants

Quantified Strategy

Decreased uncertainty, improved decisions

Global Advisors is a leader in defining quantified strategies, decreasing uncertainty, improving decisions and achieving measureable results.

We specialise in providing highly-analytical data-driven recommendations in the face of significant uncertainty.

We utilise advanced predictive analytics to build robust strategies and enable our clients to make calculated decisions.

We support implementation of adaptive capability and capacity.

Our latest

Thoughts

Global Advisors’ Thoughts: Getting the Balance Right

Global Advisors’ Thoughts: Getting the Balance Right

By Kate Barnes

I am a working mother, as are many of my friends and past colleagues. Naturally we often debate the challenges of getting the balance between work and family right.

Personal circumstances vary widely and have a big impact on the choices one has, but my solution has been to work on a part-time basis. I have been lucky enough to do so for the past seven years and to me it seems like an excellent compromise. Yet there are many times when it feels like balance is the last thing I am achieving – in fact, I have the distinct feeling that I am failing on every front – my kids, my husband, and my boss, colleagues or direct reports, all want more of me.

Perhaps the truth is that I want too much. I want to be stimulated, challenged and to feel like I am adding value in the work place, but I also want to see my children more than the average, full-time working mother.

Many working mothers have made decisions involving changes to their working day in order to manage the work-family balance better. Unfortunately, I have found that one of the biggest issues is that one cannot simply decide on an approach, agree it with your employer, and then settle into whatever routine that entails. You might agree an arrangement to work 5, or 6 or 7 hours a day, or 30 hours a week, or to arrive at work early and leave by 3 or 4pm. But in most jobs, you will have to consider the balance equation on a daily basis, sometimes multiple times a day. Is today the day I give more to work because there is a demanding deadline and everyone else is working late, or is it the day I give more to my child, because he is receiving an award at school or swimming in a gala?

And often the call has to be made taking into consideration not only what is happening today, but also looking at where the pendulum fell yesterday, or last week, or over the past couple of weeks.

As with any decision there are consequences, even if at first they are unforeseen. In the early stages of my career, I like many, was an idealistic youngster with dreams of holding a very senior, leadership position. I was ambitious, and some might say that I had much of what it takes to achieve my goal. Some years down the track I was being interviewed for a prospective job and the potential employer noted from my CV that the achievements in my career (or lack thereof) were not in line with my academic record, and he wondered why this was. I can’t remember what my response was, but I know I knew the answer. I even knew at exactly which point in my career the upward trajectory slowed. It was the day I was working at a large corporate, and I asked for flexitime. I negotiated that on two afternoons a week, I would be allowed to leave at 2pm and I would make up the time in the evening, after my young children were asleep.

Shortly thereafter, when a potential internal move to a new position was being discussed I was informed that I could not be considered for the role as I was “part-time”.

This was a wake-up call.

Read more at http://www.globaladvisors.biz/thoughts/20170719/getting-the-balance-right/

read more

Strategy Tools

Strategy Tools: Growth, Profit or Returns?

Strategy Tools: Growth, Profit or Returns?

By Stuart Graham and Marc Wilson

Stuart is a manager and Marc is a partner at Global Advisors.
Both are based in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Growth, profit or returns? It’s all three, however we find that the relationship between these and shareholder value creation is poorly understood – if at all.

All three measures become critical to the way forward as companies navigate the Covid-19 crisis.

After ensuring business survival, navigating through the Covid-19 crisis requires returns on invested capital AND growth to deliver shareholder returns. S&P 500 companies averaged 13% RONA and 5% revenue growth (CAGR) through the financial crisis (2008-2012) .

Monolithic survival approaches may starve compensating growth opportunities – a portfolio approach is required.


Key insights

Returns are not enough – companies must also grow to create value.

Profits and cash flows cannot increase indefinitely through cost-reduction, efficiency, business mix, etc – top-line growth is critical.

Returns must be above costs of capital to be value accretive.

S&P 500 companies averaged 13% ROIC and 5% revenue growth (CAGR) through the financial crisis (2008-2012).

Margins and revenue growth, or even profit growth in themselves don’t answer that question of whether shareholder value was created or destroyed. There are many examples of where growth and high margins actually destroy value.

Company valuations reflect an aggregate of their business portfolio – rebalancing segments based on their growth and return profiles can lift company value.

Growth requires investment – at the very least in the working capital required to support revenue growth.

Measuring RONA or ROIC and Revenue growth shows whether business activity is value accretive or destructive.

You can use the Global Advisors Market Cap (valuation) framework to map your business – and agree action to deliver improved shareholder returns.

read more

Fast Facts

The use of full absorption or average costing in asset-intensive industries with under-utilisation can lead to self-defeating pricing strategies

The use of full absorption or average costing in asset-intensive industries with under-utilisation can lead to self-defeating pricing strategies

Non-conformance costs can distort pricing decisions The use of full absorption or average costing in asset-intensive industries with under-utilisation can lead to self-defeating pricing strategies

  • The use of full absorption or average costing in a manufacturing environment with under-utilisation can lead to self-defeating pricing strategies
  • The increase in price to cover costs results in volume decreases – lowering factory utilisation and increasing unit production costs. This is the start of the utilisation-pricing “death spiral”
  • Costing according to factory utilisation – partial absorption costing – offers the opportunity to be more strategic about costing and utilisation
  • “Unabsorbed” costs can be targeted through OEE and volume improvements. At the same time, the “disadvantage” of having a large factory is normalised and pricing can compete with more fully-utilised factories
  • A recent manufacturing client saw 60% of unit costs arise from factory under-utilisation – sub-optimal OEE levels (non-conformance), low volumes and work-centre bottlenecks contributed to the utilisation gap
  • These principles can apply to any asset-intensive business – for example banking
read more

Selected News

Quote: Satya Nadella – Microsoft CEO

Quote: Satya Nadella – Microsoft CEO

“At scale, nothing is a commodity. We have to have our cost structure, supply-chain efficiency, and software efficiencies continue to compound to ensure margins. Scale – and one of the things I love about the OpenAI partnership – is it’s gotten us to scale. This is a scale game.” – Satya Nadella – Microsoft CEO

Satya Nadella has been at the helm of Microsoft since 2014, overseeing its transformation into one of the world’s most valuable technology companies. Born in Hyderabad, India, and educated in electrical engineering and computer science, Nadella joined Microsoft in 1992, quickly rising through the ranks in technical and business leadership roles. Prior to becoming CEO, he was best known for driving the rapid growth of Microsoft Azure, the company’s cloud infrastructure platform—a business now central to Microsoft’s global strategy.

Nadella’s leadership style is marked by systemic change—he has shifted Microsoft away from legacy, siloed software businesses and repositioned it as a cloud-first, AI-driven, and highly collaborative tech company. He is recognised for his ability to anticipate secular shifts—most notably, the move to hyperscale cloud computing and, more recently, the integration of advanced AI into core products such as GitHub Copilot and Microsoft 365 Copilot. His background—combining deep technical expertise with rigorous business training (MBA, University of Chicago)—enables him to bridge both the strategic and operational dimensions of global technology.

This quote was delivered in the context of Nadella’s public discussion on the scale economics of AI, hyperscale cloud, and the transformative partnership between Microsoft and OpenAI (the company behind ChatGPT, Sora, and GPT-4/5/6) on the BG2 podcast, 1st November 2025 In this conversation, Nadella outlines why, at the extreme end of global tech infrastructure, nothing remains a “commodity”: system costs, supply chain and manufacturing agility, and relentless software optimisation all become decisive sources of competitive advantage. He argues that scale—meaning not just size, but the compounding organisational learning and cost improvement unlocked by operating at frontier levels—determines who captures sustainable margins and market leadership.

The OpenAI partnership is, from Nadella’s perspective, a practical illustration of this thesis. By integrating OpenAI’s frontier models deeply (and at exclusive scale) within Azure, Microsoft has driven exponential increases in compute utilisation, data flows, and the learning rate of its software infrastructure. This allowed Microsoft to amortise fixed investments, rapidly reduce unit costs, and create a loop of innovation not accessible to smaller or less integrated competitors. In Nadella’s framing, scale is not a static achievement, but a perpetual game—one where the winners are those who compound advantages across the entire stack: from chip supply chains through to application software and business model design.

Theoretical Foundations and Key Thinkers

The quote’s themes intersect with multiple domains: economics of platforms, organisational learning, network effects, and innovation theory. Key theoretical underpinnings and thinkers include:

Scale Economics and Competitive Advantage

  • Alfred Chandler (1918–2007): Chandler’s work on the “visible hand” and the scale and scope of modern industrial firms remains foundational. He showed how scale, when coupled with managerial coordination, allows firms to achieve durable cost advantages and vertical integration.
  • Bruce Greenwald & Judd Kahn: In Competition Demystified (2005), they argue sustainable competitive advantage stems from barriers to entry—often reinforced by scale, especially via learning curves, supply chains, and distribution.

Network Effects and Platform Strategy

  • Jean Tirole & Marcel Boyer: Tirole’s work on platform economics shows how scale-dependent markets (like cloud and AI) naturally concentrate—network effects reinforce the value of leading platforms, and marginal cost advantage compounds alongside user and data scale.
  • Geoffrey Parker, Marshall Van Alstyne, Sangeet Paul Choudary: In their research and Platform Revolution, these thinkers elaborate how the value in digital markets accrues disproportionately to platforms that achieve scale—because transaction flows, learning, and innovation all reinforce one another.

Learning Curves and Experience Effects

  • The Boston Consulting Group (BCG): In the 1960s, Bruce Henderson’s concept of the “experience curve” formalised the insight that unit costs fall as cumulative output grows—the canonical explanation for why scale delivers persistent cost advantage.
  • Clayton Christensen: In The Innovator’s Dilemma, Christensen illustrates how technological discontinuities and learning rates enable new entrants to upend incumbent advantage—unless those incumbents achieve scale in the new paradigm.

Supply Chain and Operations

  • Taiichi Ohno and Shoichiro Toyoda (Toyota Production System): The industrial logic that relentless supply chain optimisation and compounding process improvements, rather than static cost reduction, underpin long-run advantage, especially during periods of rapid demand growth or supply constraint.

Economics of Cloud and AI

  • Hal Varian (Google, UC Berkeley): Varian’s analyses of cloud economics demonstrate the massive fixed-cost base and “public utility” logic of hyperscalers. He has argued that AI and cloud converge when scale enables learning (data/usage) to drive further cost and performance improvements.
  • Andrew Ng, Yann LeCun, Geoffrey Hinton: Pioneer practitioners in deep learning and large language models, whose work established the “scaling laws” now driving the AI infrastructure buildout—i.e., that model capability increases monotonically with scale of data, compute, and parameter count.

Why This Matters Now

Organisations at the digital frontier—notably Microsoft and OpenAI—are now locked in a scale game that is reshaping both industry structure and the global economy. The cost, complexity, and learning rate needed to operate at hyperscale mean that “commodities” (compute, storage, even software itself) cease to be generic. Instead, they become deeply differentiated by embedded knowledge, utilisation efficiency, supply-chain integration, and the ability to orchestrate investments across cycles of innovation.

Nadella’s observation underscores a reality that now applies well beyond technology: the compounding of competitive advantage at scale has become the critical determinant of sector leadership and value capture. This logic is transforming industries as diverse as finance, logistics, pharmaceuticals, and manufacturing—where the ability to build, learn, and optimise at scale fundamentally redefines what was once considered “commodity” business.

In summary: Satya Nadella’s words reflect not only Microsoft’s strategy but a broader economic and technological transformation, deeply rooted in the theory and practice of scale, network effects, and organisational learning. Theorists and practitioners—from Chandler and BCG to Christensen and Varian—have analysed these effects for decades, but the age of AI and cloud has made their insights more decisive than ever. At the heart of it: scale—properly understood and operationalised—remains the ultimate competitive lever.

read more

Polls

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Services

Global Advisors is different

We help clients to measurably improve strategic decision-making and the results they achieve through defining clearly prioritised choices, reducing uncertainty, winning hearts and minds and partnering to deliver.

Our difference is embodied in our team. Our values define us.

Corporate portfolio strategy

Define optimal business portfolios aligned with investor expectations

BUSINESS UNIT STRATEGY

Define how to win against competitors

Reach full potential

Understand your business’ core, reach full potential and grow into optimal adjacencies

Deal advisory

M&A, due diligence, deal structuring, balance sheet optimisation

Global Advisors Digital Data Analytics

14 years of quantitative and data science experience

An enabler to delivering quantified strategy and accelerated implementation

Digital enablement, acceleration and data science

Leading-edge data science and digital skills

Experts in large data processing, analytics and data visualisation

Developers of digital proof-of-concepts

An accelerator for Global Advisors and our clients

Join Global Advisors

We hire and grow amazing people

Consultants join our firm based on a fit with our values, culture and vision. They believe in and are excited by our differentiated approach. They realise that working on our clients’ most important projects is a privilege. While the problems we solve are strategic to clients, consultants recognise that solutions primarily require hard work – rigorous and thorough analysis, partnering with client team members to overcome political and emotional obstacles, and a large investment in knowledge development and self-growth.

Get In Touch

16th Floor, The Forum, 2 Maude Street, Sandton, Johannesburg, South Africa
+27114616371

Global Advisors | Quantified Strategy Consulting