Select Page

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

An AI-native strategy firm

Global Advisors: a consulting leader in defining quantified strategy, decreasing uncertainty, improving decisions, achieving measureable results.

Learn MoreGlobal Advisors AI

A Different Kind of Partner in an AI World

AI-native strategy
consulting

Experienced hires

We are hiring experienced top-tier strategy consultants

Quantified Strategy

Decreased uncertainty, improved decisions

Global Advisors is a leader in defining quantified strategies, decreasing uncertainty, improving decisions and achieving measureable results.

We specialise in providing highly-analytical data-driven recommendations in the face of significant uncertainty.

We utilise advanced predictive analytics to build robust strategies and enable our clients to make calculated decisions.

We support implementation of adaptive capability and capacity.

Our latest

Thoughts

Global Advisors’ Thoughts: Getting the Balance Right

Global Advisors’ Thoughts: Getting the Balance Right

By Kate Barnes

I am a working mother, as are many of my friends and past colleagues. Naturally we often debate the challenges of getting the balance between work and family right.

Personal circumstances vary widely and have a big impact on the choices one has, but my solution has been to work on a part-time basis. I have been lucky enough to do so for the past seven years and to me it seems like an excellent compromise. Yet there are many times when it feels like balance is the last thing I am achieving – in fact, I have the distinct feeling that I am failing on every front – my kids, my husband, and my boss, colleagues or direct reports, all want more of me.

Perhaps the truth is that I want too much. I want to be stimulated, challenged and to feel like I am adding value in the work place, but I also want to see my children more than the average, full-time working mother.

Many working mothers have made decisions involving changes to their working day in order to manage the work-family balance better. Unfortunately, I have found that one of the biggest issues is that one cannot simply decide on an approach, agree it with your employer, and then settle into whatever routine that entails. You might agree an arrangement to work 5, or 6 or 7 hours a day, or 30 hours a week, or to arrive at work early and leave by 3 or 4pm. But in most jobs, you will have to consider the balance equation on a daily basis, sometimes multiple times a day. Is today the day I give more to work because there is a demanding deadline and everyone else is working late, or is it the day I give more to my child, because he is receiving an award at school or swimming in a gala?

And often the call has to be made taking into consideration not only what is happening today, but also looking at where the pendulum fell yesterday, or last week, or over the past couple of weeks.

As with any decision there are consequences, even if at first they are unforeseen. In the early stages of my career, I like many, was an idealistic youngster with dreams of holding a very senior, leadership position. I was ambitious, and some might say that I had much of what it takes to achieve my goal. Some years down the track I was being interviewed for a prospective job and the potential employer noted from my CV that the achievements in my career (or lack thereof) were not in line with my academic record, and he wondered why this was. I can’t remember what my response was, but I know I knew the answer. I even knew at exactly which point in my career the upward trajectory slowed. It was the day I was working at a large corporate, and I asked for flexitime. I negotiated that on two afternoons a week, I would be allowed to leave at 2pm and I would make up the time in the evening, after my young children were asleep.

Shortly thereafter, when a potential internal move to a new position was being discussed I was informed that I could not be considered for the role as I was “part-time”.

This was a wake-up call.

Read more at http://www.globaladvisors.biz/thoughts/20170719/getting-the-balance-right/

read more

Strategy Tools

Strategy Tools: Growth, Profit or Returns?

Strategy Tools: Growth, Profit or Returns?

By Stuart Graham and Marc Wilson

Stuart is a manager and Marc is a partner at Global Advisors.
Both are based in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Growth, profit or returns? It’s all three, however we find that the relationship between these and shareholder value creation is poorly understood – if at all.

All three measures become critical to the way forward as companies navigate the Covid-19 crisis.

After ensuring business survival, navigating through the Covid-19 crisis requires returns on invested capital AND growth to deliver shareholder returns. S&P 500 companies averaged 13% RONA and 5% revenue growth (CAGR) through the financial crisis (2008-2012) .

Monolithic survival approaches may starve compensating growth opportunities – a portfolio approach is required.


Key insights

Returns are not enough – companies must also grow to create value.

Profits and cash flows cannot increase indefinitely through cost-reduction, efficiency, business mix, etc – top-line growth is critical.

Returns must be above costs of capital to be value accretive.

S&P 500 companies averaged 13% ROIC and 5% revenue growth (CAGR) through the financial crisis (2008-2012).

Margins and revenue growth, or even profit growth in themselves don’t answer that question of whether shareholder value was created or destroyed. There are many examples of where growth and high margins actually destroy value.

Company valuations reflect an aggregate of their business portfolio – rebalancing segments based on their growth and return profiles can lift company value.

Growth requires investment – at the very least in the working capital required to support revenue growth.

Measuring RONA or ROIC and Revenue growth shows whether business activity is value accretive or destructive.

You can use the Global Advisors Market Cap (valuation) framework to map your business – and agree action to deliver improved shareholder returns.

read more

Fast Facts

The use of full absorption or average costing in asset-intensive industries with under-utilisation can lead to self-defeating pricing strategies

The use of full absorption or average costing in asset-intensive industries with under-utilisation can lead to self-defeating pricing strategies

Non-conformance costs can distort pricing decisions The use of full absorption or average costing in asset-intensive industries with under-utilisation can lead to self-defeating pricing strategies

  • The use of full absorption or average costing in a manufacturing environment with under-utilisation can lead to self-defeating pricing strategies
  • The increase in price to cover costs results in volume decreases – lowering factory utilisation and increasing unit production costs. This is the start of the utilisation-pricing “death spiral”
  • Costing according to factory utilisation – partial absorption costing – offers the opportunity to be more strategic about costing and utilisation
  • “Unabsorbed” costs can be targeted through OEE and volume improvements. At the same time, the “disadvantage” of having a large factory is normalised and pricing can compete with more fully-utilised factories
  • A recent manufacturing client saw 60% of unit costs arise from factory under-utilisation – sub-optimal OEE levels (non-conformance), low volumes and work-centre bottlenecks contributed to the utilisation gap
  • These principles can apply to any asset-intensive business – for example banking
read more

Selected News

Quote: Stephen Schwartzman – Blackstone Founder

Quote: Stephen Schwartzman – Blackstone Founder

“You have to be very gentle around people. If you’re in a leadership position, people hear your words amplified. You have to be very careful what you say and how you say it. You always have to listen to what other people have to say. I genuinely want to know what everybody else thinks.” – Stephen Schwarzman – Blackstone Founder

“You have to be very gentle around people. If you’re in a leadership position, people hear your words amplified. You have to be very careful what you say and how you say it. You always have to listen to what other people have to say. I genuinely want to know what everybody else thinks.” – Stephen Schwarzman – Blackstone Founder

Stephen A. Schwarzman’s quote on gentle, thoughtful leadership encapsulates decades spent at the helm of Blackstone—the world’s largest alternative asset manager—where he forged a distinctive culture and process rooted in careful listening, respectful debate, humility, and operational excellence. The story behind this philosophy is marked by formative setbacks, institutional learning, and the broader evolution of modern leadership theory.

Stephen Schwarzman: Background and Significance

Stephen A. Schwarzman, born in 1947 in Philadelphia, rose to prominence after co-founding Blackstone in 1985 with Pete Peterson. Initially, private markets comprised a tiny fraction of institutional portfolios; under his stewardship, allocations in private assets have grown exponentially, fundamentally reshaping global investing. Schwarzman is renowned for his relentless pursuit of operational improvement, risk discipline, and market timing—his mantra, “Don’t lose money,” is enforced by multi-layered approval and rigorous debate.

Schwarzman’s experience as a leader is deeply shaped by early missteps. The Edgecomb Steel investment loss was pivotal: it catalyzed Blackstone’s institutionalized investment committees, de-risking debates, and a culture where anyone may challenge ideas so long as discussion remains fact-based and impersonal. This setback taught him accountability, humility, and the value of systemic learning—his response was not to retreat from risk, but to build a repeatable, challenge-driven process. Crucially, he narrates his own growth from a self-described “C or D executive” to a leader who values gentleness, clarity, humor, and private critique—understanding that words uttered from the top echo powerfully and can shape (or harm) culture.

Beyond technical accomplishments, Schwarzman’s legacy is one of building enduring institutions through codified values: integrity, decency, and hard work. His leadership maxim—“be gentle, clear, and high standard; always listen”—is a template for strong cultures, high performance, and sustainable growth.

The Context of the Quote

The quoted passage emerges from Schwarzman’s reflections on leadership lessons acquired over four decades. Known for candid self-assessment, he openly admits to early struggles with management style but evolved to prioritize humility, care, and active listening. At Blackstone, this meant never criticizing staff in public and always seeking divergent views to inform decisions. He emphasizes that a leader’s words carry amplified weight among teams and stakeholders; thus, intentional communication and genuine listening are essential for nurturing an environment of trust, engagement, and intelligent risk-taking.

This context is inseparable from Blackstone’s broader organizational playbook: institutionalized judgment, structured challenge, and brand-centered culture—all designed to accumulate wisdom, avoid repeating mistakes, and compound long-term value. Schwarzman’s leadership pathway is a case study in the power of personal evolution, open dialogue, and codified norms that outlast the founder himself.

Leading Theorists and Historical Foundations

Schwarzman’s leadership philosophy is broadly aligned with a lineage of thinkers who have shaped modern approaches to management, organizational behavior, and culture:

  • Peter Drucker: Often called the “father of modern management,” Drucker stressed that leadership is defined by results and relationships, not positional power. His work emphasized listening, empowering employees, and the ethical responsibility of those at the top.

  • Warren Bennis: Bennis advanced concepts of authentic leadership, self-awareness, and transparency. He argued that leaders should be vulnerable, model humility, and act as facilitators of collective intelligence rather than commanders.

  • Jim Collins: In “Good to Great,” Collins describes “Level 5 Leaders” as those who combine professional will with personal humility. Collins underscores that amplifying diverse viewpoints and creating cultures of disciplined debate lead to enduring success.

  • Edgar Schein: Schein’s studies of organizational culture reveal that leaders not only set behavioral norms through their actions and words but also shape “cultural DNA” by embedding values of learning, dialogue, and respect.

  • Amy Edmondson: Her pioneering work in psychological safety demonstrates that gentle leadership—rooted in listening and respect—fosters environments where people can challenge ideas, raise concerns, and innovate without fear.

Each of these theorists contributed to the understanding that gentle, attentive leadership is not weakness, but a source of institutional strength, resilience, and competitive advantage. Their concepts mirror the systems at Blackstone: open challenge, private correction, and leadership by example.

Schwarzman’s Distinction and Industry Impact

Schwarzman’s practice stands out in several ways. He institutionalized lessons from mistakes to create robust decision processes and a genuine challenge culture. His insistence on brand-building as strategy—where every decision, hire, and visual artifact reinforces trust—reflects an awareness of the symbolic weight of leadership. Under his guidance, Blackstone’s transformation from a two-person startup into a global giant offers a living illustration of how values, process, and leadership style drive superior, sustainable outcomes.

In summary, the quoted insight is not platitude, but hard-won experience from a legendary founder whose methods echo the best modern thinking on leadership, learning, and organizational resilience. The theorists tracing this journey—from Drucker to Edmondson—affirm that the path to “enduring greatness” lies in gentle authority, careful listening, institutionalized memory, and the humility to learn from every setback.

read more

Polls

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Services

Global Advisors is different

We help clients to measurably improve strategic decision-making and the results they achieve through defining clearly prioritised choices, reducing uncertainty, winning hearts and minds and partnering to deliver.

Our difference is embodied in our team. Our values define us.

Corporate portfolio strategy

Define optimal business portfolios aligned with investor expectations

BUSINESS UNIT STRATEGY

Define how to win against competitors

Reach full potential

Understand your business’ core, reach full potential and grow into optimal adjacencies

Deal advisory

M&A, due diligence, deal structuring, balance sheet optimisation

Global Advisors Digital Data Analytics

14 years of quantitative and data science experience

An enabler to delivering quantified strategy and accelerated implementation

Digital enablement, acceleration and data science

Leading-edge data science and digital skills

Experts in large data processing, analytics and data visualisation

Developers of digital proof-of-concepts

An accelerator for Global Advisors and our clients

Join Global Advisors

We hire and grow amazing people

Consultants join our firm based on a fit with our values, culture and vision. They believe in and are excited by our differentiated approach. They realise that working on our clients’ most important projects is a privilege. While the problems we solve are strategic to clients, consultants recognise that solutions primarily require hard work – rigorous and thorough analysis, partnering with client team members to overcome political and emotional obstacles, and a large investment in knowledge development and self-growth.

Get In Touch

16th Floor, The Forum, 2 Maude Street, Sandton, Johannesburg, South Africa
+27114616371

Global Advisors | Quantified Strategy Consulting