ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
An AI-native strategy firmGlobal Advisors: a consulting leader in defining quantified strategy, decreasing uncertainty, improving decisions, achieving measureable results.
A Different Kind of Partner in an AI World
AI-native strategy
consulting
Experienced hires
We are hiring experienced top-tier strategy consultants
Quantified Strategy
Decreased uncertainty, improved decisions
Global Advisors is a leader in defining quantified strategies, decreasing uncertainty, improving decisions and achieving measureable results.
We specialise in providing highly-analytical data-driven recommendations in the face of significant uncertainty.
We utilise advanced predictive analytics to build robust strategies and enable our clients to make calculated decisions.
We support implementation of adaptive capability and capacity.
Our latest
Thoughts
Global Advisors’ Thoughts: Getting the Balance Right
By Kate Barnes
I am a working mother, as are many of my friends and past colleagues. Naturally we often debate the challenges of getting the balance between work and family right.
Personal circumstances vary widely and have a big impact on the choices one has, but my solution has been to work on a part-time basis. I have been lucky enough to do so for the past seven years and to me it seems like an excellent compromise. Yet there are many times when it feels like balance is the last thing I am achieving – in fact, I have the distinct feeling that I am failing on every front – my kids, my husband, and my boss, colleagues or direct reports, all want more of me.
Perhaps the truth is that I want too much. I want to be stimulated, challenged and to feel like I am adding value in the work place, but I also want to see my children more than the average, full-time working mother.
Many working mothers have made decisions involving changes to their working day in order to manage the work-family balance better. Unfortunately, I have found that one of the biggest issues is that one cannot simply decide on an approach, agree it with your employer, and then settle into whatever routine that entails. You might agree an arrangement to work 5, or 6 or 7 hours a day, or 30 hours a week, or to arrive at work early and leave by 3 or 4pm. But in most jobs, you will have to consider the balance equation on a daily basis, sometimes multiple times a day. Is today the day I give more to work because there is a demanding deadline and everyone else is working late, or is it the day I give more to my child, because he is receiving an award at school or swimming in a gala?
And often the call has to be made taking into consideration not only what is happening today, but also looking at where the pendulum fell yesterday, or last week, or over the past couple of weeks.
As with any decision there are consequences, even if at first they are unforeseen. In the early stages of my career, I like many, was an idealistic youngster with dreams of holding a very senior, leadership position. I was ambitious, and some might say that I had much of what it takes to achieve my goal. Some years down the track I was being interviewed for a prospective job and the potential employer noted from my CV that the achievements in my career (or lack thereof) were not in line with my academic record, and he wondered why this was. I can’t remember what my response was, but I know I knew the answer. I even knew at exactly which point in my career the upward trajectory slowed. It was the day I was working at a large corporate, and I asked for flexitime. I negotiated that on two afternoons a week, I would be allowed to leave at 2pm and I would make up the time in the evening, after my young children were asleep.
Shortly thereafter, when a potential internal move to a new position was being discussed I was informed that I could not be considered for the role as I was “part-time”.
This was a wake-up call.
Read more at http://www.globaladvisors.biz/thoughts/20170719/getting-the-balance-right/
Strategy Tools
Strategy Tools: Growth, Profit or Returns?
By Stuart Graham and Marc Wilson
Stuart is a manager and Marc is a partner at Global Advisors.
Both are based in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Growth, profit or returns? It’s all three, however we find that the relationship between these and shareholder value creation is poorly understood – if at all.
All three measures become critical to the way forward as companies navigate the Covid-19 crisis.
After ensuring business survival, navigating through the Covid-19 crisis requires returns on invested capital AND growth to deliver shareholder returns. S&P 500 companies averaged 13% RONA and 5% revenue growth (CAGR) through the financial crisis (2008-2012) .
Monolithic survival approaches may starve compensating growth opportunities – a portfolio approach is required.
Key insights
Returns are not enough – companies must also grow to create value.
Profits and cash flows cannot increase indefinitely through cost-reduction, efficiency, business mix, etc – top-line growth is critical.
Returns must be above costs of capital to be value accretive.
S&P 500 companies averaged 13% ROIC and 5% revenue growth (CAGR) through the financial crisis (2008-2012).
Margins and revenue growth, or even profit growth in themselves don’t answer that question of whether shareholder value was created or destroyed. There are many examples of where growth and high margins actually destroy value.
Company valuations reflect an aggregate of their business portfolio – rebalancing segments based on their growth and return profiles can lift company value.
Growth requires investment – at the very least in the working capital required to support revenue growth.
Measuring RONA or ROIC and Revenue growth shows whether business activity is value accretive or destructive.
You can use the Global Advisors Market Cap (valuation) framework to map your business – and agree action to deliver improved shareholder returns.
Fast Facts
The use of full absorption or average costing in asset-intensive industries with under-utilisation can lead to self-defeating pricing strategies
The use of full absorption or average costing in asset-intensive industries with under-utilisation can lead to self-defeating pricing strategies
- The use of full absorption or average costing in a manufacturing environment with under-utilisation can lead to self-defeating pricing strategies
- The increase in price to cover costs results in volume decreases – lowering factory utilisation and increasing unit production costs. This is the start of the utilisation-pricing “death spiral”
- Costing according to factory utilisation – partial absorption costing – offers the opportunity to be more strategic about costing and utilisation
- “Unabsorbed” costs can be targeted through OEE and volume improvements. At the same time, the “disadvantage” of having a large factory is normalised and pricing can compete with more fully-utilised factories
- A recent manufacturing client saw 60% of unit costs arise from factory under-utilisation – sub-optimal OEE levels (non-conformance), low volumes and work-centre bottlenecks contributed to the utilisation gap
- These principles can apply to any asset-intensive business – for example banking
Selected News
Quote: Sam Walton – American retail pioneer
“Great ideas come from everywhere if you just listen and look for them. You never know who’s going to have a great idea.” – Sam Walton – American retail pioneer
This quote epitomises Sam Walton’s core leadership principle—openness to ideas from all levels of an organisation. Walton, the founder of Walmart and Sam’s Club, was known for his relentless focus on operational efficiency, cost leadership, and, crucially, a culture that actively valued contributions from employees at every tier.
Walton’s approach stemmed from his own lived experience. Born in 1918 in rural Oklahoma, he grew up during the Great Depression—a time that instilled a profound respect for hard work and creative problem-solving. After service in the US Army, he managed a series of Ben Franklin variety stores. Denied the opportunity to pilot a new discount retail model by his franchisor, Walton struck out on his own, opening the first Walmart in Rogers, Arkansas in 1962, funded chiefly through personal risk and relentless ambition.
From the outset, Walton positioned himself as a learner—famously travelling across the United States to observe competitors and often spending time on the shop floor listening to the insights of front-line staff and customers. He believed valuable ideas could emerge from any source—cashiers, cleaners, managers, or suppliers—and his instinct was to capitalise on this collective intelligence.
His management style, shaped by humility and a drive to democratise innovation, helped Walmart scale from a single store to the world’s largest retailer by the early 1990s. The company’s relentless growth and robust internal culture were frequently attributed to Walton’s ability to source improvements and innovations bottom-up rather than solely relying on top-down direction.
About Sam Walton
Sam Walton (1918–1992) was an American retail pioneer who, from modest beginnings, changed global retailing. His vision for Walmart was centred on three guiding principles:
- Offering low prices for everyday goods.
- Maintaining empathetic customer service.
- Cultivating a culture of shared ownership and continual improvement through employee engagement.
Despite his immense success and wealth, Walton was celebrated for his modesty—driving a used pickup, wearing simple clothes, and living in the same town where his first store opened. He ultimately built a business empire that, by 1992, encompassed over 2,000 stores and employed more than 380,000 people.
Leading Theorists Related to the Subject Matter
Walton’s quote and philosophy connect to three key schools of thought in innovation and management theory:
1. Peter Drucker
Peter Drucker, often called the father of modern management, advocated for management by walking around: leaders should remain closely connected to their organisations and use the intelligence of their workforce to inform decision-making. Drucker taught that innovation is an organisational discipline, not the exclusive preserve of senior leadership or R&D specialists.
2. Henry Chesbrough
Chesbrough developed the concept of open innovation, which posits that breakthrough ideas often originate outside a company’s traditional boundaries. He argued that organisations should purposefully encourage inflow and outflow of knowledge to accelerate innovation and create value, echoing Walton’s insistence that great ideas can (and should) come from anywhere.
3. Simon Sinek
In his influential work Start with Why, Sinek explores the notion that transformational leaders elicit deep engagement and innovative thinking by grounding teams in purpose (“Why”). Sinek identifies that companies weld innovation into their DNA when leaders empower all employees to contribute to improvement and strategic direction.
Additional Relevant Thinkers and Concepts
- Clayton Christensen: In The Innovator’s Dilemma, he highlights the role of disruptive innovation which is frequently initiated by those closest to the customer or the front line, not at the corporate pinnacle.
- Eric Ries: In The Lean Startup, Ries argues it is the fast feedback and agile learning from the ground up that enables organisations to innovate ahead of competitors—a direct parallel to Walton’s method of sourcing and testing ideas rapidly in store environments.
Sam Walton’s lasting impact is not just Walmart’s size, but the conviction that listening widely—to employees, customers, and the broader community—unlocks the innovations that fuel lasting competitive advantage. This belief is increasingly echoed in modern leadership thinking and remains foundational for organisations hoping to thrive in a fast-changing world.

Polls
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Services
Global Advisors is different
We help clients to measurably improve strategic decision-making and the results they achieve through defining clearly prioritised choices, reducing uncertainty, winning hearts and minds and partnering to deliver.
Our difference is embodied in our team. Our values define us.
Corporate portfolio strategy
Define optimal business portfolios aligned with investor expectations
BUSINESS UNIT STRATEGY
Define how to win against competitors
Reach full potential
Understand your business’ core, reach full potential and grow into optimal adjacencies
Deal advisory
M&A, due diligence, deal structuring, balance sheet optimisation
Global Advisors Digital Data Analytics
14 years of quantitative and data science experience
An enabler to delivering quantified strategy and accelerated implementation
Digital enablement, acceleration and data science
Leading-edge data science and digital skills
Experts in large data processing, analytics and data visualisation
Developers of digital proof-of-concepts
An accelerator for Global Advisors and our clients
Join Global Advisors
We hire and grow amazing people
Consultants join our firm based on a fit with our values, culture and vision. They believe in and are excited by our differentiated approach. They realise that working on our clients’ most important projects is a privilege. While the problems we solve are strategic to clients, consultants recognise that solutions primarily require hard work – rigorous and thorough analysis, partnering with client team members to overcome political and emotional obstacles, and a large investment in knowledge development and self-growth.
Get In Touch
16th Floor, The Forum, 2 Maude Street, Sandton, Johannesburg, South Africa
+27114616371
