Breaking Business News Archives - Page 4 of 56 - Global Advisors

Quote: John Doerr – Venture Capitalist

“An effective goal-setting system starts with disciplined thinking at the top, with leaders who invest the time and energy to choose what counts.” — John Doerr, Measure What Matters

This insight from John Doerr encapsulates the transformative power of Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) as a leadership discipline. Doerr emphasizes that meaningful organizational progress doesn’t begin with broad intentions or scattered efforts but with top leadership committing to carefully define, prioritize, and communicate the few goals that truly matter.
In the late 1990s, as a prominent venture capitalist at Kleiner Perkins, Doerr brought the OKR framework—originated at Intel by Andy Grove—to Google’s founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin. At the time, Google was a promising but unproven startup. The company’s early leaders faced the challenge of harnessing creativity and ambition in a way that would deliver measurable results, not just innovative ideas.

Doerr’s central message to Google was: Strategy requires ruthless clarity—leaders must devote “time and energy to choose what counts,” setting focused objectives and quantifiable results. This disciplined approach allowed Google, and countless organizations since, to achieve sustained alignment, transparency, and execution at scale.

About John Doerr

John Doerr (b. 1951) is one of Silicon Valley’s most influential venture capitalists and thought leaders. Early in his career, he joined Intel, where he learned directly from Andy Grove’s culture of rigorous, measurable management. At Kleiner Perkins, Doerr helped fund and build some of the world’s most consequential technology companies, including Google, Amazon, and Sun Microsystems. Beyond capital, Doerr contributed operational insight—most notably by importing Intel’s OKR system to Google just after its founding.

His book, Measure What Matters, distils decades of experience, showing how OKRs drive performance, accountability, and innovation in organizations ranging from start-ups to global giants. Doerr continues to advocate for mission-driven leadership and data-driven management, focusing on climate and societal impact alongside business achievement.

Leading Theorists on Goal Setting and Measurement

The intellectual roots of Doerr’s philosophy are grounded in the science and practice of management by objectives and the broader theory of performance measurement:

Andy Grove: As CEO of Intel, Grove pioneered the OKR methodology by adapting Peter Drucker’s management by objectives (MBO) into a system demanding clarity of intent and measurable results. Grove believed that carefully articulated and universally visible goals enable organizations not only to perform but to transform—insisting that ambiguous objectives breed mediocrity, while clear ones unite teams in pursuit of excellence.
Peter Drucker: The father of modern management, Drucker emphasized that “what gets measured gets managed.” He advocated for systematic goal setting and the importance of assessing results—a philosophy foundational for OKRs and later frameworks. While not the originator of OKRs, Drucker’s insistence on measurement as a precondition for improvement shaped generations of leaders.
Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Norton: Creators of the Balanced Scorecard, these theorists advanced the view that organizational strategy must be translated into concrete metrics across financial and non-financial dimensions. Like OKRs, their framework requires disciplined leadership to select and communicate the few priorities that drive value.
Edwin Locke & Gary Latham: Their research on goal-setting theory established that specific, challenging goals lead to higher performance than vague or easy objectives, provided feedback and commitment are present. The OKR system embodies their insights by coupling ambitious objectives with clearly defined milestones.

John Doerr’s conviction is clear: Organizational greatness hinges not just on vision but on the discipline of leaders to set, prioritize, and measure what truly matters. The OKR framework, built on the shoulders of the world’s leading management theorists, remains a catalyst for clarity, focus, and transformative achievement.

Stay up to date with the Global Advisors Whatsapp channel!

Follow our Global Advisors Whatsapp channel to get updates and news!

https://globaladvisors.biz/whatsapp

Term: Lean

Lean is a management philosophy and set of practices aimed at maximizing value for customers by systematically identifying and eliminating waste in organizational processes, particularly in manufacturing but now widely applied across many sectors. The lean approach is rooted in five core principles:

Define value strictly from the customer’s perspective, focusing efforts on what truly matters to the end user.
Map the value stream, visualizing and analyzing every step required to bring a product or service from conception to delivery, with the aim of distinguishing value-adding from non-value-adding activities (waste).
Create flow by organizing processes so that work progresses smoothly without interruptions, bottlenecks, or delays.
Establish pull systems, so that production or work is driven by actual customer demand rather than forecasts, minimizing overproduction and excess inventory.
Pursue perfection through ongoing, incremental improvement, embedding a culture where employees at every level continuously seek better ways of working.

Waste in lean (known as muda in Japanese) refers to any activity that consumes resources but does not add value to the customer. Classic categories of waste include overproduction, waiting, transportation, excess processing, inventory, unnecessary motion, and defects. Beyond process efficiency, lean is also about empowering workers, fostering cross-functional collaboration, and embedding continuous improvement (kaizen) into the company culture.

Key Theorist: James P. Womack

The leading contemporary advocate and theorist of lean as a strategic management system is James P. Womack. Womack transformed the field by articulating and popularizing lean concepts globally. He is best known for co-authoring the seminal book The Machine That Changed the World (1990) and, with Daniel T. Jones, codifying the five lean principles that underpin modern lean practices.

Biography and Relationship to Lean:
James P. Womack (born 1948) is an American researcher, educator, and founder of the nonprofit Lean Enterprise Institute (LEI) in 1997, which has become a principal center for lean research, training, and advocacy. Womack’s work in the 1980s and 1990s brought the insights of Toyota’s production system (TPS)—the original inspiration for lean manufacturing—to Western audiences. By documenting how Toyota achieved superior quality and efficiency through principles of waste reduction, flow, and respect for people, Womack reframed these practices as a universal management system, not simply a set of tools or Japanese business peculiarities.

Womack’s framework distilled the essence of lean into the five principles described above and provided a strategic roadmap for their application in manufacturing, services, healthcare, and beyond. His continued research, writing, and global education efforts have made him the most influential figure in the dissemination and application of lean management worldwide.

Summary: Lean is a customer-focused management system for continuous improvement and waste elimination, guided by five core principles. James P. Womack is the most prominent lean theorist, whose research and advocacy helped define, codify, and globalize lean as a foundational approach to organizational excellence.

Quote: Lord Kelvin (William Thomson) – Physicist

“When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it…your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind.” – Lord Kelvin (William Thomson)

This iconic statement, voiced by Lord Kelvin in the late 19th century during a lecture, elegantly captures the spirit of scientific inquiry in the industrial age. Its context lies at the intersection of theory and practice: scientists and engineers were wrestling with how to systematize knowledge and drive real technological progress. The British Empire, amid the Industrial Revolution, thrived on advances in physics, engineering, and telegraphy, demanding both rigorous theory and practical, measurable outcomes.

Kelvin’s philosophy was revolutionary for his time. He argued that true understanding comes not simply from speculation or qualitative insight but must be backed by quantitative measurement. This perspective helped establish the foundation for modern scientific method and engineering practice, where empirical data and precision are paramount.

About Lord Kelvin

William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin (1824–1907) was a towering figure in science and engineering. Born in Belfast and educated at Cambridge, Kelvin held the chair of Natural Philosophy at the University of Glasgow for over half a century. His scholarship ranged from mathematical physics to practical engineering, and the breadth of his impact was remarkable:

Thermodynamics: Kelvin played a key role in formulating the first and second laws of thermodynamics, crucial to our understanding of energy and heat.
Absolute Temperature: He developed the concept of absolute zero and the temperature scale named in his honor—the kelvin.
Telegraphy & Engineering: Kelvin’s inventiveness extended to significant improvements in telegraphy. His instruments and techniques were pivotal in laying the first successful transatlantic telegraph cable, earning him fame, wealth, and a knighthood in 1866.
Leadership: He served as president of the Royal Society and was elected to scientific societies worldwide, testifying to his international influence.
Legacy: His name is embedded in physics (the kelvin), and his rigorous approach to measurement helped usher in an era where engineering precision and scientific progress went hand in hand.

In 1892, he was elevated to the peerage as Lord Kelvin, the first scientist to be so honoured, choosing his title after the River Kelvin that flows by the University of Glasgow.

Leading Theorists and the Science of Measurement

Lord Kelvin’s dictum on measurement shaped the work of generations of physicists, engineers, and organizational theorists. Measurement became the keystone of operational science, influencing leading minds far beyond physics:

James Clerk Maxwell: Kelvin’s contemporary, foundational in electromagnetism, pursued the same ideal of quantification and precision in physical law.
Norbert Wiener: Later, as the founding father of cybernetics, Wiener established the science of systems, feedback, and control—fields fundamentally reliant on measurement and quantification.
Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Norton: In management, these scholars advanced the Balanced Scorecard, a system for translating strategy into measurable performance metrics, directly reflecting Kelvin’s principle—quantified assessment drives understanding, improvement, and accountability.
Peter Drucker: Often cited (sometimes inaccurately) with phrases like “what gets measured gets managed,” Drucker’s management theories similarly emphasize the necessity of tangible performance indicators for organizational effectiveness. While Drucker refined this insight, Kelvin’s assertion laid the groundwork for connecting measurement to both knowledge and action.

Together, these theorists built on Kelvin’s insight that measurement is not mere accounting—it is the bedrock of progress in science, engineering, and organizational strategy. The enduring impact of this idea is visible in everything from physics and engineering to business analytics and modern performance management.

Term: OKRs – Objectives and Key Results

OKR (Objectives and Key Results) is a widely used goal-setting framework that enables organizations, teams, and individuals to define clear, aspirational objectives and track their achievement through specific, measurable key results. This approach is designed to bridge the gap between strategy and execution, ensuring that high-level organizational vision gets translated into actionable, quantifiable outcomes.

An OKR consists of two main components:

Objective: A qualitative, ambitious goal that describes what you want to achieve. It should be significant, concrete, and inspirational—for example, “Be recognized as the customer service leader in our market.”
Key Results: 3–5 quantitative, outcome-based metrics that define success for the objective. These should be specific, time-bound, and track progress—such as “Reduce customer complaint resolution time from 5 to 2 hours.”

Initiatives often supplement OKRs but are not required; these are the projects and actions taken to influence the achievement of the Key Results.

OKRs promote transparency, alignment, and accountability across organizations. They are generally set at the company, team, or individual level and are revisited quarterly or monthly for review and scoring.

OKRs vs. KPIs and the Balanced Scorecard

	OKRs	KPIs	Balanced Scorecard
Purpose	Drive strategic change and achieve ambitious goals	Monitor ongoing business performance	Align business activities with strategy
Structure	Qualitative Objective + Quantitative Key Results	Quantitative metrics (standalone)	Four perspectives: financial, customer, internal process, learning/growth
Focus	Strategic priorities; change and improvement	Performance of existing processes or systems	Balance of leading/lagging indicators, strategy execution
Review Cycle	Typically quarterly	Ongoing, varies	Periodic (often quarterly, sometimes annually)
Use Case	Setting, aligning, and tracking stretch goals	Tracking and analysing performance	Strategic management and performance tracking

KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) are generally metrics that indicate ongoing performance, whereas OKRs set ambitious goals and measure progress through key results that are tied directly to those goals.
The Balanced Scorecard, developed by Robert Kaplan and David Norton in the early 1990s, is a broader performance management system that incorporates multiple perspectives (financial, customer, internal processes, and learning/growth) to align business activities with strategic objectives.
OKRs can be used in conjunction with or as an alternative to the Balanced Scorecard. Some organizations use OKRs to define and operationalize the strategic goals set in a balanced scorecard, translating these goals into measurable outcomes and aligning teams around their pursuit. Others may replace a scorecard entirely with OKRs for a more focused, agile goal-setting methodology.

Leading Strategy Theorist Behind OKRs: Andy Grove

Andrew S. Grove (1936–2016) is credited as the originator of the OKR framework. Born in Budapest, Hungary, Grove survived Nazi occupation and the Soviet invasion before fleeing to the United States in 1956. He earned a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the University of California, Berkeley.

At Intel, where he was one of the earliest employees and later served as CEO (1987–1998) and Chairman, Grove revolutionized both the company and wider management thinking. In his 1983 classic High Output Management, he documented the use of “iMBO” (Intel Management by Objectives), which provided the foundation for OKRs as they are practiced today. Grove believed that combining ambitious, qualitative objectives with specific, quantitative key results was critical for driving focus, alignment, and acceleration of progress within highly competitive, fast-changing industries.

Grove’s methods directly influenced pioneers such as John Doerr, who brought OKRs to Google and played a key role in their widespread adoption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

OKRs offer a flexible, transparent alternative or complement to KPIs and tools like the Balanced Scorecard, driving organizational alignment, agility, and focus—an approach rooted in Andy Grove’s philosophy of high performance through clear, measurable ambition.

Quote: Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton – creators of the Balanced Scorecard approach

“Today’s organisational value-creating activities are not captured in the tangible, fixed assets of the firm. Instead, value rests in the ideas of people scattered throughout the firm, in customer and supplier relationships, in databases of key information, and cultures of innovation and quality.” – Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton – creators of the Balanced Scorecard approach

This statement exemplifies a key shift in modern management thinking championed by Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton. Historically, companies measured their worth by physical assets—machinery, buildings, inventory, and other tangible resources. However, by the late 20th century, breakthrough research and business transformations revealed that intangible factors—knowledge, innovation, relationships, and organizational culture—were often the real drivers of sustainable value and competitive advantage.

Kaplan and Norton addressed this gap by developing the Balanced Scorecard in the early 1990s, arguing that traditional financial measures alone were insufficient to capture an organisation’s true value-creating processes. Their framework encouraged leaders to assess performance not just in terms of revenue and profit, but also through perspectives such as internal business processes, customer satisfaction, and—critically—the innovation and learning (or learning and growth) perspective. This emphasised how assets like employee expertise, informational capital, and organizational learning drive future performance and adaptability.

The quote reflects their conviction that in the knowledge economy, ideas, relationships, and a culture of continuous improvement are at the core of lasting organizational value. Kaplan and Norton’s holistic perspective reshaped global management practices, making companies far more aware of the hidden, intangible strengths that sustain growth and excellence.

About Kaplan and Norton: Theorists Shaping Strategy and Measurement

Robert S. Kaplan is an influential American academic and Emeritus Professor at Harvard Business School. Trained as an engineer and economist, Kaplan’s early research revolutionised management accounting through innovations like Activity-Based Costing. His engagement with performance measurement deepened when he collaborated with David P. Norton.

David P. Norton came from a background combining engineering, business, and consultancy, ultimately crafting a career as a management strategist and executive. Norton’s work translated academic insights into practical tools for organisations across sectors.

In 1990, Kaplan and Norton undertook a pioneering research project into how organizations measure performance. Their collaboration resulted in the creation of the Balanced Scorecard—a system designed to link strategy formulation with execution, and to provide executives with a balanced view of their organisation’s progress. Rather than relying on isolated metrics, their model integrates four perspectives: financial, customer, internal processes, and innovation & learning. This approach compels organisations to consider whether they can continually improve and create value, not just deliver short-term results.

Over the years, Kaplan and Norton continued to evolve their ideas, expanding the Balanced Scorecard approach into broader theories of strategy maps and organisational alignment. Their joint work has had profound influence, helping leaders around the world realize that a company’s most valuable assets are often those you cannot see on a balance sheet, but that can be measured, nurtured, and leveraged to achieve enduring success.

Term: Strategic Alignment Model

The Strategic Alignment Model (SAM), as defined by Venkatraman and Henderson in the IBM Systems Journal, is a foundational framework for aligning an organization’s business strategy and IM strategy to maximize value and achieve sustainable success.

The Strategic Alignment Model (SAM) was developed to address the growing need for organizations to effectively exploit IT capabilities for competitive advantage and manage the increasing complexity of aligning technology with business goals. SAM forms the conceptual backbone of Business/IT Alignment theories widely applied in both research and practice.

The Strategic Alignment Model (SAM), as defined by Venkatraman and Henderson in the IBM Systems Journal, is a foundational framework for aligning an organization’s business strategy and IT strategy to maximize value and achieve sustainable success.

Core Components of the Strategic Alignment Model

The model is structured around four domains—two external and two internal—each representing critical organizational dimensions:

External domains:
- Business Strategy (how the firm positions itself in the market)
- IM Strategy (the overarching approach to leveraging information technologies)
Internal domains:
- Organizational Infrastructure and Processes (the internal structure supporting business objectives)
- IT Infrastructure and Processes (technology structure facilitating IT goals)

Alignment occurs through two key linkages:

Strategic Fit (vertical link): Ensuring strategies influence internal infrastructures and operations.
Functional Integration (horizontal link): Synchronizing business and IM strategies for cohesive objectives.

SAM proposes that achieving alignment requires choices across all four domains to be made in parallel, with consistent logic and rationale supporting both strategic formulation and execution.

Perspectives on Alignment

Venkatraman and colleagues identify four dominant alignment perspectives for analytic alignment between Business and IT:

Strategy Execution: Business strategy drives both corporate and IS infrastructure; top management formulates strategy, IT implements it.
Technology Transformation (not fully detailed in the results, but known from the model): Business strategy drives IT strategy, which in turn shapes IT infrastructure.
Competitive Potential: IT capabilities inform new business strategies.
Service Level: IM strategy dictates how the business supports and exploits technology in operations.

Each perspective highlights a different way in which business and IM strategies interact and shape organizational success.

Key Theorists: N. Venkatraman and John C. Henderson

N. Venkatraman is widely recognized as the principal architect behind the Strategic Alignment Model. His research in information technology, strategy, and organizational transformation helped establish the foundational link between IT investments and business value through effective alignment.

Biography (N. Venkatraman):
- Current Role: Professor at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business.
- Expertise: Strategic management, information systems, digital transformation.
- Impact: Venkatraman’s work has shaped how organizations conceptualize the value and competitive advantage derived from IT, emphasizing the structured process of aligning business and technological strategies—a direct outcome of the SAM framework.

John C. Henderson collaborated extensively with Venkatraman and co-authored the original foundational work presenting the Strategic Alignment Model in the IBM Systems Journal.

Biography (John C. Henderson):
- Current Role: Has held significant academic positions, most notably at Boston University and MIT Sloan School of Management.
- Expertise: Information systems, business process management, strategic alignment of IT.
- Relationship to SAM: Co-developed the model, contributing deeply to understanding how dynamic organizational changes and IT investments reshape competitive landscapes and organizational performance.

Their relationship to the Strategic Alignment Model is that of co-originators. Their joint efforts have made SAM the dominant paradigm for addressing the alignment of business strategies and IT capabilities, profoundly influencing both theory and best practices in corporate strategy and digital transformation.

In essence: The Strategic Alignment Model by Venkatraman and Henderson is the pivotal framework guiding organizations in aligning business and IT realms—represented and continuously refined by the scholarly work and deep expertise of these two leading theorists.

Quote: Fyodor Dostoevsky – Russian novelist, essayist and journalist

“A man who lies to himself, and believes his own lies becomes unable to recognize truth, either in himself or in anyone else, and he ends up losing respect for himself and for others. When he has no respect for anyone, he can no longer love, and, in order to divert himself, having no love in him, he yields to his impulses, indulges in the lowest forms of pleasure, and behaves in the end like an animal. And it all comes from lying – lying to others and to yourself.” – Fyodor Dostoevsky – Russian novelist, essayist and journalist

Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky (November 11, 1821 – February 9, 1881) was a Russian novelist, essayist, and journalist who explored the depths of the human psyche with unflinching honesty. Born in Moscow to a family of modest means, Dostoevsky’s early life was marked by the emotional distance of his parents and an eventual tragedy when his father was murdered. He trained as a military engineer but pursued literature with relentless ambition, achieving early success with novels such as Poor Folk and The Double.

Dostoevsky’s life took a dramatic turn in 1849 when he was arrested for participating in a radical intellectual group. Sentenced to death, he faced a mock execution before his sentence was commuted to four years of hard labor in Siberia followed by military service. This harrowing experience, combined with his life among Russia’s poor, profoundly shaped his worldview and writing. His later years were marked by personal loss—the deaths of his first wife and his brother—and financial hardship, yet he produced some of literature’s greatest works during this time, including Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, Devils, and The Brothers Karamazov.

Dostoevsky’s writings are celebrated for their psychological insight and existential depth. He scrutinized themes of morality, free will, faith, and the consequences of self-deception—topics that continue to resonate in philosophy, theology, and modern psychology. His funeral drew thousands, reflecting his status as a national hero and one of Russia’s most influential thinkers.

Context of the Quote

The quoted passage is widely attributed to Dostoevsky, most notably appearing in The Brothers Karamazov, his final and perhaps most philosophically ambitious novel. The novel, published in serial form shortly before his death, wrestles with questions of faith, doubt, and the consequences of living a lie.

The quote is spoken by the Elder Zosima, a wise and compassionate monk in the novel. Zosima’s teachings in The Brothers Karamazov frequently address the dangers of self-deception and the importance of spiritual and moral honesty. In this passage, Dostoevsky is warning that lying to oneself is not merely a moral failing, but a fundamental corruption of perception and being. The progression—from dishonesty to self-deception, to the loss of respect for oneself and others, and ultimately to the decay of love and humanity—paints a stark picture of spiritual decline.

This theme is central to Dostoevsky’s work: characters who deceive themselves often spiral into psychological and moral crises. Dostoevsky saw truth—even when painful—as a prerequisite for authentic living. His novels repeatedly show how lies, whether to oneself or others, lead to alienation, suffering, and a loss of authentic connection.

Leading Theorists on Self-Deception

While Dostoevsky is renowned in literature for his treatment of self-deception, the theme has also been explored by philosophers, psychologists, and sociologists. Below is a brief overview of leading theorists and their contributions:

Philosophers

Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855): The Danish philosopher explored the idea of existential self-deception, particularly in The Sickness Unto Death, where he describes how humans avoid the despair of being true to themselves by living inauthentic lives, what he calls “despair in weakness.”
Jean-Paul Sartre (1905–1980): In Being and Nothingness, Sartre popularized the concept of “bad faith” (mauvaise foi), the act of deceiving oneself to avoid the anxiety of freedom and responsibility. Sartre’s ideas are often seen as a philosophical counterpart to Dostoevsky’s literary explorations.
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900): Nietzsche’s concept of “resentment” and the “will to power” also touches on self-deception, particularly how individuals and societies construct false narratives to justify their weaknesses or desires.

Psychologists

Sigmund Freud (1856–1939): Freud introduced the idea of defence mechanisms, such as denial and rationalization, as ways the psyche protects itself from uncomfortable truths—essentially systematizing the process of self-deception.
Donald Winnicott (1896–1971): The psychoanalyst discussed the “false self,” a persona developed to comply with external demands, often leading to inner conflict and emotional distress.
Erich Fromm (1900–1980): Fromm, like Dostoevsky, examined how modern society encourages escape from freedom and the development of “automaton conformity,” where individuals conform to avoid anxiety and uncertainty.

Modern Thinkers

Dan Ariely (b. 1967): The behavioural economist has shown experimentally how dishonesty often begins with small, self-serving lies that gradually erode ethical boundaries.
Robert Trivers (b. 1943): The evolutionary biologist proposed that self-deception evolved as a strategy to better deceive others, which ironically can make personal delusions more convincing.

Legacy and Insight

Dostoevsky’s insights into the dangers of self-deception remain remarkably relevant today. His work, together with that of philosophers and psychologists, invites reflection on the necessity of honesty—not just to others, but to oneself—for psychological health and authentic living. The consequences of failing this honesty, as Dostoevsky depicts, are not merely moral, but existential: they impact our ability to respect, love, and ultimately, to live fully human lives.

By placing this quote in context, we see not only the literary brilliance of Dostoevsky but also the enduring wisdom of his diagnosis of the human condition—a call to self-awareness that echoes through generations and disciplines.

Term: Balanced Scorecard

The Balanced Scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that provides organizations with a comprehensive framework to drive performance and implement strategy. Unlike traditional performance metrics that focus solely on financial outcomes, the Balanced Scorecard emphasizes a balanced view by integrating both financial and non-financial measures.

At its core, the Balanced Scorecard helps organizations:

Translate vision and strategy into clear objectives and actionable goals
Align day-to-day activities with strategic priorities
Measure and monitor progress across multiple dimensions
Connect projects, KPIs, objectives, and strategy into a coherent system

The framework divides performance measurement into four key perspectives:

Financial Perspective: Assesses financial performance indicators such as profitability and return on investment
Customer Perspective: Gauges customer satisfaction, retention, and market share
Internal Processes Perspective: Evaluates internal operational efficiency, quality, and innovation
Learning & Growth Perspective: Monitors employee development, organizational culture, and capacity for future improvement

Within each perspective, organizations define:

Objectives: Strategic goals derived from overall strategy
Measures: KPIs to monitor progress toward objectives
Initiatives: Action plans to achieve desired results

The Balanced Scorecard has become a widely adopted tool across sectors—including corporate, government, and non-profit—due to its ability to offer a holistic approach to performance management and strategic alignment.

Leading Theorists: Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Norton

The Balanced Scorecard concept was developed in the early 1990s by Dr. Robert S. Kaplan and Dr. David P. Norton. Their work stemmed from a Harvard Business Review article published in 1992, which addressed the limitations of relying solely on financial metrics for organizational performance.

Robert S. Kaplan:

Dr. Kaplan is an American academic, Emeritus Professor of Leadership Development at the Harvard Business School, and a leading authority on management accounting and performance measurement. After earning degrees from M.I.T. and Cornell, Kaplan spent much of his career researching managerial accounting innovations and co-introduced Activity-Based Costing before collaborating on the Balanced Scorecard.

David P. Norton:

Dr. Norton earned an engineering undergraduate degree from Worcester Polytechnic Institute and later an MBA from Florida Institute of Technology. He built his career as a business executive, management consultant, and co-founder of several performance management firms. Norton partnered with Kaplan to combine academic rigor and practical consultancy experience, shaping the Balanced Scorecard into a methodology that organizations worldwide could implement.

Kaplan and Norton’s joint research into strategy execution revealed that organizations often struggled to operationalize their strategies and link performance measures with long-term objectives. With the Balanced Scorecard, they provided a solution that bridges the gap between strategic planning and operational execution, establishing a system that empowers organizations to continually review and refine their path to success.

Their legacy includes not only the Balanced Scorecard but also later contributions on strategy maps and organizational alignment, setting global standards in performance management theory and practice.

Quote: Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller and professor

“Today I choose courage over comfort.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller and professor

Brené Brown, a research professor, author, and renowned speaker, is celebrated worldwide for her groundbreaking work on vulnerability, courage, shame, and empathy. This quote encapsulates her core philosophy: that true growth—whether personal, relational, or professional—comes not from staying safe within our comfort zones, but from making the conscious decision to face discomfort and uncertainty with bravery.

Brown’s landmark research revealed that vulnerability is not a weakness, but the greatest measure of courage. She explored these ideas in bestsellers like Daring Greatly, The Gifts of Imperfection, and Rising Strong, inspiring millions across the globe to lead more authentic, whole-hearted lives. Her now-famous TED Talk, “The Power of Vulnerability,” has become a touchstone in conversations about human connection and resilience.

The context for “Today I choose courage over comfort” can be found throughout Brown’s writings and lectures. For Brown, integrity is defined by the willingness to act with courage even when it’s uncomfortable, choosing what is right over what is easy. In her book Rising Strong, she writes:

“Integrity is choosing courage over comfort; choosing what is right over what is fun, fast, or easy; and choosing to practice our values rather than simply professing them.”

Brown consistently emphasizes that vulnerability and courage are inextricably linked—there is no courage without uncertainty and emotional risk. Whether addressing leaders, entrepreneurs, or anyone striving for meaningful change, she challenges us to “show up, be seen, and live brave” even when endurance is hard.

About Brené Brown:
A research professor at the University of Houston, Brown’s two decades of study have shaped contemporary conversations around emotional intelligence, ethical leadership, and authentic connection. She is celebrated for bringing academic rigor to subjects previously avoided in business and personal development: the mechanics of trust, the costs of shame, and the anatomy of belonging.

Pioneers in the Field of Courage and Vulnerability

Brown’s work builds upon and amplifies insights from earlier theorists who explored courage, authenticity, and human flourishing:

Theodore Roosevelt: His “Man in the Arena” speech inspired Brown’s focus on daring greatly—celebrating those who risk failure in pursuit of something meaningful.
Carl Rogers: A foundational humanistic psychologist, Rogers championed unconditional positive regard and authenticity in relationships, emphasizing the healing power of being seen and accepted as we are.
Abraham Maslow: Known for Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, he placed self-actualization—the fulfillment of one’s potential—at the top, arguing that courage to grow is what drives humans upward.
Viktor Frankl: The Holocaust survivor and psychiatrist described meaning as a central motivator in life, and wrote extensively on the courage necessary to find purpose even in hardship.
Angela Duckworth: A contemporary researcher, Duckworth studies grit, the combination of passion and perseverance, dovetailing with Brown’s view that courage sustains effort beyond comfort.

Together, these theorists shaped the understanding that thriving requires more than talent or intelligence—it demands the willingness to be vulnerable, to stumble, and to rise stronger.

Resonance of the Quote

“Today I choose courage over comfort” stands as a daily reminder to honour our values, even when ease and avoidance tempt us. Brown’s legacy is the call to action: Lead with heart. Embrace discomfort. Make the brave choice—not just once, but day after day, in ways that transform lives, organizations, and communities.

Term: Congruence

Congruence, as defined by Carl Rogers, is a state of alignment or harmony between an individual’s self-concept (their real self) and their ideal self (who they wish to be). Rogers developed this term within his humanistic approach to psychology in the 1950s, making it a central tenet of person-centered therapy.

Congruence means that our feelings, thoughts, and outward behaviours consistently reflect our true values and beliefs. When we are congruent, we accept and recognize our emotional experiences without distortion or denial. This internal unity leads to authenticity and a sense of well-being, as our actions and communications transparently match our internal state.

If the self-concept and real experiences are in sync, a person is congruent.
If there is a mismatch—a person pretends or hides their true feelings—this is incongruence.

Rogers was clear that perfect congruence is rare; most people fluctuate between states of congruence and incongruence. Striving towards greater congruence, however, supports mental health, self-esteem, resilience, and deeper relationships. Rogers emphasized that congruence is enabled by experiences of unconditional positive regard: being valued by others without conditions leads people to accept themselves and, over time, align their ideal and real selves.

“We cannot change, we cannot move away from what we are, until we thoroughly accept what we are. Then change seems to come about almost unnoticed.”—Carl Rogers

Related Strategy Theorist: Abraham Maslow

Backstory and Theoretical Relationship

Abraham Maslow is the most significant related theorist when it comes to congruence, particularly through his concept of self-actualization. Maslow, like Rogers, was a founder of humanistic psychology. Self-actualization refers to the fulfilment of one’s unique potential and the desire to become everything one is capable of becoming. Maslow placed this at the pinnacle of his Hierarchy of Needs, suggesting that after basic physiological and psychological needs are met, individuals are driven to realize their true selves—a state highly congruent with Rogers’ congruence.

Maslow’s work on authenticity, growth, and inner motivation provided a broader societal and organizational context for Rogers’ ideas. While Rogers delved into therapy and the individual’s emotional life, Maslow examined what congruent living looks like in leadership, creativity, and strategic action. His studies of exemplary individuals (like Abraham Lincoln and Eleanor Roosevelt) showcased that the most successful people are deeply congruent: they live by deeply held principles, are comfortable with themselves, and integrate their personal and professional actions around their genuine values.

Biography:
Abraham Maslow (1908–1970), American psychologist and professor, began his career studying motivation and personality. Dissatisfied with the era’s focus on pathology, he championed human potential, peak experiences, and holistic well-being. Maslow’s legacy continues through modern organizational development, leadership theory, and coaching—domains where alignment between belief, strategy, and action (congruence) is recognized as the hallmark of effective leadership.

In summary, both Rogers and Maslow emphasized that living congruently—not just knowing our values but embodying them in action—is essential for authentic growth, psychological health, and strategic clarity.

Quote: Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller and professor

“Blame is simply the discharging of discomfort and pain. It has an inverse relationship with accountability. Blaming is a way that we discharge anger.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

The quote emerges from Brené Brown’s extensive research into vulnerability, emotional intelligence, and the social dynamics of blame and accountability. As a renowned research professor, author, and speaker, Brown has spent decades exploring how people respond to adversity, shame, and imperfection, particularly in contexts that demand courage and connection.

This particular insight derives from Brown’s exploration of why people instinctively assign blame when confronted with pain or anger. Rather than solving problems or fostering growth, blame offers a false sense of relief—it shifts discomfort outward and temporarily soothes our own emotional turmoil. However, as Brown’s research demonstrates, blame is ultimately counterproductive; it consumes energy that could be spent on honest self-reflection and constructive dialogue, undermining the very possibility of real change or learning.

Brown shares candid, sometimes humorous stories about her own “blamer” tendencies, illuminating the universal nature of these behaviours and the courage required to break the cycle. She emphasizes that accountability—facing our role in situations, admitting mistakes, and communicating openly—demands vulnerability and resilience. True accountability opens the door to empathy, growth, and trust, while habitual blame keeps us defensive and disconnected.

Brown’s work on this subject has become foundational for leaders, educators, and organizations that prioritize psychological safety and high-functioning teams. Her call is not simply to reduce blame, but to build cultures where compassionate responsibility and honest conversations replace finger-pointing and shame.

The Person Behind the Quote: Brené Brown

Brené Brown is a research professor at the University of Houston and a visiting professor at the University of Texas at Austin McCombs School of Business. She is the author of multiple New York Times bestsellers, including Daring Greatly, The Gifts of Imperfection, and Dare to Lead, and is widely recognized for her TED talk, “The Power of Vulnerability,” which has been viewed by millions worldwide.

Brown’s career is distinguished by her focus on vulnerability, courage, authenticity, and shame. Her work bridges rigorous academic research with practical guidance, helping individuals and organizations harness the power of difficult emotions to foster deeper connection and greater innovation. Her thoughtful insights into the dynamics of blame and accountability have reshaped conversations in business, education, healthcare, and public service.

Leading Theorists Related to Blame and Accountability

The study of blame, accountability, and emotional process has roots in multiple fields, from psychology to conflict resolution. Notable contributors include:

Marshall B. Rosenberg: Creator of Nonviolent Communication (NVC), Rosenberg argued that blame and punitive mindsets perpetuate conflict rather than resolve it. He believed that all violence results from people tricking themselves into thinking their pain is caused by others, leading to cycles of blame and retribution. His teachings focus on empathy, personal responsibility, and compassionate dialogue.
Andy Stanley: In leadership and organizational theory, Stanley provides insight into the futility of blame as an agent of change. He famously noted, “People who blame things rarely change things. Blame is an unassailable change-avoidance strategy.” His perspective reinforces the notion that embracing accountability is essential for growth and problem-solving.
Albert Ellis: A notable psychologist and creator of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT), Ellis emphasized personal accountability as central to emotional well-being. He taught that individuals must recognize and change their own irrational beliefs and reactions, including blaming others for their feelings and circumstances.
Aaron T. Beck: The father of cognitive therapy, Beck’s research into cognitive distortions highlights that blame is often a symptom of deeper misconceptions about self and others, impeding effective problem-solving and emotional regulation.

Together, these theorists—along with Brown’s own influential voice—have illuminated the traps of reflexive blame and the transformative potential of compassionate accountability. Their collective work speaks to a universal truth: To create lasting change and connection, we must be willing to move beyond blame, confront vulnerability, and embrace responsibility.

Term: Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT)

Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT) is a pioneering, action-oriented form of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) developed by psychologist Albert Ellis in the 1950s. At its core, REBT is based on the idea that emotional distress and maladaptive behaviors are primarily caused not by external events themselves, but by our irrational beliefs and interpretations of those events.

REBT aims to help individuals identify, challenge, and replace irrational beliefs with more realistic, flexible, and rational ones, leading to healthier emotions and behaviours. The therapy centers around the ABC model, which illustrates this process:

A – Activating Event: Something happens in your environment that triggers a response.
B – Belief: The thoughts and beliefs (often irrational) about the event.
C – Consequence: The emotional and behavioural outcomes that result from those beliefs.

For example, a person who does not receive a response to a message may irrationally believe, “They must not like me; I’ll always be alone” (B), leading to feelings of anxiety or depression (C). REBT works to dismantle such irrational beliefs and replace them, for instance, with, “Maybe they’re busy; one unanswered message does not define my worth.”

Key principles of REBT include:

Understanding that thoughts, emotions, and behaviors are interconnected.
Teaching that irrational, rigid beliefs (“I must succeed,” “Others should,” “Life ought to…”) are the source of much emotional suffering.
Promoting unconditional self-acceptance, unconditional other-acceptance, and unconditional life-acceptance (USA, UOA, ULA), regardless of circumstances or mistakes.

REBT is particularly valuable for those dealing with anxiety, depression, anger, guilt, shame, perfectionism, and relationship or performance issues. The therapy is active, directive, and pragmatic, focusing on present thoughts and behaviors to produce meaningful, lasting change.

Albert Ellis: The Leading Theorist and His Relationship to REBT

Albert Ellis (1913–2007) was an American psychologist and one of the most influential figures in modern psychotherapy. Dissatisfied with the slower pace and interpretative nature of psychoanalysis—which he originally practiced—Ellis developed REBT as a more practical and empirically grounded approach to psychological well-being.

Driven by the insight that patients’ suffering was more often rooted in dysfunctional thinking rather than external circumstances, Ellis began systematically teaching clients how to recognize, dispute, and replace their irrational beliefs. His approach was revolutionary in that it placed the responsibility for emotion and behavior squarely on the individual’s beliefs, empowering clients to take control of their internal narratives and emotional responses.

Ellis’s impact extends far beyond the therapy room. His work provided the foundational principles for the broader family of cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT)—including Aaron T. Beck’s cognitive therapy—transforming how psychological disorders are understood and treated worldwide. Over his career, Ellis published more than 75 books and authored hundreds of articles, becoming known for his direct style, wit, and unwavering commitment to helping people confront their self-defeating beliefs.

He famously stated:

“The best years of your life are the ones in which you decide your problems are your own. You do not blame them on your mother, the ecology, or the president. You realize that you control your own destiny.”

Ellis’s legacy lives on in the tens of thousands of clinicians and millions of clients who continue to benefit from the clear, rational, and compassionate principles of REBT.

Quote: Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

“Courage starts with showing up and letting ourselves be seen.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

This quote from Brené Brown distills the essence of her two decades of research into a simple yet profound truth: True courage is rooted in vulnerability—the willingness to show up authentically and allow ourselves to be seen, despite uncertainty or risk. When Brown speaks of “showing up,” she refers to the act of engaging fully in life, relationships, workplaces, and communities, even when outcomes are uncertain or we fear judgment. The second half, “letting ourselves be seen,” invites individuals to move beyond façades, embrace their authentic selves, and risk openness in order to foster genuine connection and growth.

Brown’s work has illuminated how authentic leadership and meaningful relationships depend not on perfection or bravado, but on the willingness to be vulnerable. Her research demonstrates that courageous leadership, innovation, and resilient cultures emerge when people are supported in being seen as they are, imperfections and all.

Brown first brought this perspective into the public consciousness with her widely viewed TEDx talk, “The Power of Vulnerability,” where she explored the intersection of courage, vulnerability, and shame. Since then, she has expanded on these themes through bestsellers such as Daring Greatly, Dare to Lead, and The Gifts of Imperfection. The quote epitomizes her belief that vulnerability is not a weakness but the birthplace of innovation, creativity, and change.

About Brené Brown

Brené Brown is a research professor at the University of Houston, where she holds the Huffington Foundation Endowed Chair at the Graduate College of Social Work. She is also a visiting professor of management at the University of Texas at Austin McCombs School of Business. Brown’s work is grounded in qualitative research, focusing on the complex human experiences of courage, vulnerability, shame, and empathy.

She is the author of six #1 New York Times bestsellers and the host of the acclaimed podcasts Unlocking Us and Dare to Lead. Brown’s influence extends from academia into popular culture and organizations worldwide. Her TED talk, “The Power of Vulnerability,” ranks among the most viewed globally, reflecting her skill as a storyteller who marries in-depth research with accessible, relatable insights. She has also produced content for major platforms such as Netflix and HBO Max, further advancing conversations on leadership and emotional intelligence.

Leading Theorists Related to the Subject Matter

The study of courage, vulnerability, and personal growth is informed by a rich tapestry of psychological and sociological thought. In addition to Brown, several theorists have shaped the contemporary understanding of these topics:

Carl Rogers: A founding figure in humanistic psychology, Rogers emphasized the importance of unconditional positive regard and authentic self-expression, arguing that being truly seen by others fosters personal growth. His client-centered approach underpins much of the value placed on vulnerability in modern psychological practice.
Albert Bandura: Bandura’s work on self-efficacy and social learning underscores the significance of modeling behaviors—including the courage to take risks and reveal one’s authentic self—as mechanisms for individual and group development.
Kristin Neff: A pioneer in self-compassion research, Neff explores how self-kindness and mindfulness promote resilience and openness, particularly in the face of perceived failure or imperfection. Her work aligns closely with Brown’s focus on vulnerability and shame resilience.
James K. Stoller (and contemporaries in leadership science): Research on authentic leadership highlights that transparent, vulnerable leaders inspire trust, foster innovation, and achieve better outcomes in complex environments—a direct reflection of Brown’s themes.

Brown’s scholarship is uniquely influential because she bridges the academic and practical realms, showing how research-backed principles of courage and connection are essential not just for personal transformation, but for healthy organizations and communities. Her insight—that courage begins with the simple but costly act of showing up and being seen—speaks to a universal need and a timeless call to leadership and humanity.

Term: Mindfulness

Mindfulness is a cognitive skill that involves maintaining a moment-by-moment awareness of one’s thoughts, feelings, bodily sensations, and surrounding environment, often through meditation or sustained practice. It is characterized by a non-judgmental acceptance of the present moment, allowing individuals to observe their internal states and emotions without becoming entangled in them. This practice has roots in Buddhist meditation but has evolved into a secular tool for enhancing mental and physical well-being in the Western world.

Mindfulness has been widely adopted in various therapeutic interventions, including mindfulness-based cognitive behaviour therapy (MBCT), mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). These practices help individuals manage stress, anxiety, and depression by cultivating a mindful approach to their experiences.

Related Strategy Theorist: Jon Kabat-Zinn

Backstory and Relationship to Mindfulness

Jon Kabat-Zinn is a pivotal figure in the modern Western adaptation of mindfulness. Born on June 5, 1944, in New York City, Kabat-Zinn is an American scientist, writer, and meditation teacher. He is most renowned for founding the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program at the University of Massachusetts Medical School in 1979. This program has been instrumental in popularizing mindfulness as a therapeutic tool worldwide.

Kabat-Zinn’s journey into mindfulness began during his Ph.D. studies in molecular biology. He became interested in Buddhism and meditation, seeing them as a way to apply mindfulness to everyday life. His work seeks to integrate mindfulness with Western psychology and medicine, making it accessible for people from diverse backgrounds. Through his research and teaching, Kabat-Zinn has shown how mindfulness can improve physical and mental health, reduce stress, and enhance overall well-being.

Biography

Kabat-Zinn holds a Ph.D. in molecular biology from MIT and is a long-time practitioner of meditation and yoga. He is the author of several books, including Full Catastrophe Living and Wherever You Go, There You Are, which have contributed significantly to the popular understanding of mindfulness. His work has inspired numerous mindfulness programs across the globe, transforming the way healthcare providers approach mental health and stress management.

Today, Kabat-Zinn continues to advocate for mindfulness as a powerful tool for personal growth and societal transformation. His legacy in developing MBSR has made mindfulness a cornerstone of modern psychological practice, demonstrating its potential to foster resilience and well-being in individuals and communities.

Additional Key Figures:

Thích Nh?t H?nh: A renowned Buddhist monk and peace activist, H?nh is another influential figure in popularizing mindfulness. He has written extensively on the practice and its application in everyday life.
Kristin Neff: Known for her work on self-compassion, Neff’s research often intersects with mindfulness, as both practices emphasize the importance of non-judgmental awareness.

Quote: Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

““Owning our story can be hard but not nearly as difficult as spending our lives running from it. Embracing our vulnerabilities is risky but not nearly as dangerous as giving up on love and belonging and joy – the experiences that make us the most vulnerable. Only when we are brave enough to explore the darkness will we discover the infinite power of our light.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

Brené Brown is a renowned researcher, storyteller, and professor whose work has fundamentally reshaped how we understand and engage with concepts such as vulnerability, courage, shame, and empathy. As a research professor at the University of Houston and the director of the Center for Daring Leadership at BetterUp, Brown has spent more than two decades delving into how these attributes shape our sense of connection, leadership, and psychological well-being.

The quote in question comes from Brown’s deep exploration into the “power of vulnerability.” Her seminal TEDx talk in 2010, The Power of Vulnerability, distilled a decade of academic research into a message that resonated around the world. Brown’s research revealed that embracing our vulnerabilities—not hiding from them—is essential for experiencing the fullness of love, belonging, and joy. She argues that running from our stories, especially those parts we hide out of shame, actually distances us from meaning, connection, and authenticity. True courage, she asserts, is found not in avoiding darkness or risk but in stepping into it, trusting that doing so reveals our deepest strengths.

Brown’s work is grounded in her use of qualitative research methods, particularly Grounded Theory, to analyse interviews and narratives across hundreds of individuals. This rigorous approach uncovered that resilience in the face of shame and the willingness to be open—rather than closed off—directly correlates with living a more fulfilling, wholehearted life.

Context of the Quote

“Owning our story can be hard but not nearly as difficult as spending our lives running from it…” encapsulates Brown’s thesis: the real danger lies not in being vulnerable but in refusing vulnerability altogether. In a world where self-presentation—magnified by social media and societal pressures—often feels safer than honesty, Brown’s research champions a countercultural embrace of openness. Her ideas have rapidly gained influence, particularly among younger generations striving for authenticity in both personal and professional spheres.

Influential Theorists and Roots of Brown’s Work

Brown’s scholarship is deeply interwoven with and builds upon major figures in psychology and human development:

Carl Rogers: A pioneer of humanistic psychology and client-centered therapy, Rogers emphasized unconditional positive regard and the importance of authenticity and self-acceptance in personal growth. His work set a foundation for understanding the power of vulnerability in relationships and self-development.
Viktor Frankl: Known for logotherapy and his book Man’s Search for Meaning, Frankl explored the critical human drive for purpose and meaning—ideas echoed in Brown’s focus on connection as life’s true source of meaning.
John Bowlby: The father of attachment theory, Bowlby’s research illustrated how early bonds shape our capacity for connection, trust, and vulnerability—a notion that Brown centers in her exploration of belonging and shame.
Alfred Adler: Adler’s work on inferiority, social connectedness, and the drive for significance deeply influenced subsequent understandings of resilience and self-worth, both of which are central to Brown’s research on shame and courage.
Harriet Lerner: A prominent psychologist and author on topics of shame and connection, Lerner helped shine a light on the role these experiences play in our sense of self and in relationships.

In the contemporary era, Kristin Neff—a psychologist and leading researcher on self-compassion—has also contributed to our understanding of the imperative for kindness towards oneself, a concept that complements Brown’s prescriptions for overcoming shame.

Brown’s Impact and Legacy

By fusing rigorous academic research with relatable storytelling, Brené Brown has made vulnerability, honesty, and emotional courage central tenets of modern leadership, organizational culture, and personal development. Her books, podcasts, and talks are credited with igniting global conversations about mental and emotional health—a legacy that continues to resonate through businesses, educational institutions, and social movements. Often described as offering “data with soul”, Brown’s work is both a call and a roadmap for embracing the fullness of our humanity, trusting that only by facing our darkness can we unlock the infinite power of our own light.

Term: Grounded theory

Grounded theory is a systematic qualitative research methodology that focuses on developing theories directly from empirical data rather than starting with preconceived hypotheses or theoretical frameworks. Unlike traditional research methods, which often test existing theories, grounded theory uses inductive reasoning: researchers gather data through interviews, observations, or documents and then analyse this data as it is collected, allowing patterns and concepts to emerge organically from within the data itself.

Key characteristics of grounded theory include:

Starting with data: The process begins by collecting rich, qualitative data about people’s behaviours, experiences, or interactions, often through close observation or interviews.
Coding and categorization: As data is gathered, researchers attach codes—succinct tags that capture important concepts—and continuously compare new data with what’s already been gathered, refining and grouping these codes into higher-level categories.
Theory building: Through repeated comparison and analysis, overarching patterns and themes are identified. These are eventually synthesized into a theory that is “grounded” in the data, reflecting the real-world complexities and variations captured by the researchers.
Flexible, iterative process: The methodology is dynamic and open-ended. Researchers may return to collect more data based on emerging insights, a practice known as theoretical sampling, continuing until theoretical saturation—when no new concepts are emerging.
Applicability: The resulting theories are intended to be directly relevant to the specific contexts studied, providing explanations and predictions that “fit” the lived realities of participants.

Origins and the Leading Theorists

Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss are the co-founders of grounded theory. Their influential 1967 book, The Discovery of Grounded Theory, challenged the prevailing logic of hypothesis-driven research. At that time, social sciences often relied on deductive approaches—establishing theoretical frameworks first, then collecting data to confirm or deny hypotheses. Glaser, a sociologist trained in quantitative methods, and Strauss, who brought a background in medical sociology and phenomenology, aimed to create an approach that would allow theory to arise from the complexity of real-life data without being constrained by prior assumptions.

Barney Glaser (b. 1930): Glaser’s academic roots lie in Columbia University, where he was deeply influenced by scholars such as Paul Lazarsfeld and Robert Merton. Glaser’s focus on comparative analysis and his work in quantitative methods informed the structured, systematic nature of grounded theory. After collaborating with Strauss, Glaser helped popularize grounded theory across various disciplines and later worked to preserve what he viewed as its original methodological rigor.
Anselm Strauss (1916–1996): Strauss studied at the University of Chicago, a centre for symbolic interactionism, and developed strong interests in the study of social processes, interaction, and meaning making. His background brought a sensitivity to participant perspectives that became central to grounded theory. Later, Strauss—along with Juliet Corbin—refined grounded theory’s procedures by formalizing open, axial, and selective coding, expanding practitioners’ tools for data analysis.

Their early collaboration stemmed from their joint study on terminal illness, documented in Awareness of Dying (1965), which provided both the empirical impetus and the methodological framework for grounded theory.

Legacy and Influence

Grounded theory’s influence has extended far beyond sociology, impacting fields such as psychology, health sciences, management, and education. Its flexibility, adaptability, and reliance on lived experience have made it a vital tool for uncovering complex social processes and for building theories that remain closely tied to real-world practice. Subsequent theorists such as Kathy Charmaz have further developed the approach by emphasizing the researcher’s interpretative role, leading to “constructivist grounded theory,” reflecting the ongoing evolution of this foundational qualitative methodology.

Quote: Jim Collins – Author, academic

“The most powerfully transformative executives possess a paradoxical mixture of personal humility and professional will. They are timid and ferocious. Shy and fearless. They are rare – and unstoppable.” – Jim Collins – Author, academic

Jim Collins, the author behind this quote, is a renowned figure in business thinking whose work has fundamentally shaped how organizations and leaders view greatness and transformation. Collins is best known for his ground-breaking research and best-selling books on business management, leadership, and organizational sustainability, with “Good to Great” standing out as a seminal text.

Jim Collins’ Backstory and Context of the Quote

Jim Collins began his professional journey with a Bachelor of Science in Mathematical Sciences from Stanford University, followed by an MBA from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. Early in his career, he worked at McKinsey & Company, where he witnessed first-hand the research that would underpin In Search of Excellence, one of the early classics in management literature.

His intellectual curiosity led him to academia, where he taught at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business and earned distinction for his contributions. It was during this period that Collins started asking probing questions: What sets truly great companies apart? How do ordinary organizations become exceptional? These explorations culminated in his influential research laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, where he worked with leaders from diverse sectors—corporate, non-profit, and even the military.

The featured quote exemplifies Collins’s insight from the “Level 5 Leadership” concept, introduced in Good to Great. Through extensive research, Collins and his team identified that the most transformative leaders combined personal humility with unwavering professional will. These leaders are not brash or self-aggrandizing; rather, their strength is paradoxical. They are both “timid and ferocious,” “shy and fearless,” embodying a rare blend of virtues that make them, as Collins notes, “unstoppable”. This philosophy challenged the then-prevailing myth that only charismatic, larger-than-life personalities could lead organizations to enduring success.

About Jim Collins

Jim Collins is recognized as a preeminent business thinker worldwide, having authored or co-authored six major works—including Built to Last, Good to Great, and How the Mighty Fall—that have collectively sold over ten million copies. Beyond his research and writing, Collins has worked as a consultant and teacher to executives in both the public and private sectors, and his influence extends far beyond academia. He has been shaped by mentorships with other leading thinkers, notably Peter Drucker, whom Collins has described as his greatest inspiration.

Leading Theorists Related to Transformative Leadership

The field of transformative and paradoxical leadership draws on a rich tradition of management thought:

Peter Drucker is considered the father of modern management and was a major influence on Collins. Drucker’s approach to management emphasized integrity, decentralization, and a focus on results rather than charisma or force of personality. Drucker’s writings, including The Practice of Management, underpin much of today’s thinking on leadership effectiveness and long-term organizational success.
Tom Peters and Robert Waterman were pivotal figures in developing the excellence movement with their book In Search of Excellence. Their research, which Collins encountered during his time at McKinsey, focused on the traits that distinguish high-performing organizations, including the importance of strong yet humble leadership.
Warren Bennis contributed significantly to leadership studies, particularly around authentic leadership—leaders who are self-aware, guided by values, and able to inspire trust and performance within teams.
John Kotter is known for his work on leading organizational change, emphasizing that effective transformational leaders create a sense of urgency, craft a vision, and empower others—a framework that complements Collins’s observations on humility and will.
James MacGregor Burns introduced the concept of transformational leadership, describing leaders who motivate followers by raising their level of morality and motivation, echoing Collins’s findings about humility and aspiration.

Legacy and Impact

The synthesis of personal humility and professional will continues to redefine what is expected of leaders in business and beyond. Collins’s insights have inspired executives and aspiring leaders to seek greatness not through ego or bravado, but through resilience, discipline, and a quiet but relentless drive for excellence. His ongoing contributions keep shaping new generations of leaders in pursuit of not just success, but true and enduring greatness.

Quote: Shannon L. Alder – Author, therapist

“You have two choices in life when it comes to truthful observations by others that anger you: You can be ashamed and cover it up by letting your pride take you in the extreme opposite direction, in order to make the point that they are wrong. Or, you can break down the walls of pride by accepting vulnerability as a strength, not a weakness. As you walk through your vulnerability, you will meet humility on the way to courage. From here, courage allows us to let go of shame and rise higher into the person we are meant to be, not the person that needs to be right. This is the road to confidence and self worth.” – Shannon L. Alder – Author, therapist

Shannon L. Alder is an American inspirational author and therapist known for her practical wisdom and deeply empathetic approach to personal growth and relationships. Born in New Mexico in 1970, Alder has built a reputation as a widely quoted writer, with her insights appearing in over 300 books by other authors and extensive online publications. Her works include bestsellers like 300 Questions to Ask Your Parents Before It’s Too Late, 300 Questions LDS Couples Should Ask Before Marriage, and The Narcissistic Abuse Recovery Bible, among others.

Alder’s writing is renowned for its direct, nurturing style that invites readers to confront personal truths and seek healing without shame. She draws from her dual experience as a therapist—specializing in recovery from emotional and narcissistic abuse—and as someone who has herself faced and overcome adversity. This combination gives her a unique authority and compassion for the complexities of vulnerability, humility, and courage.

Alder is also known for her “Shannonisms”—aphoristic expressions and bite-sized reflections that circulate widely on social media and in motivational literature. Her focus on vulnerability as a strength, not a weakness, is a cornerstone of her message. She encourages readers to see the act of opening oneself to discomfort and critique as an entry point not to shame, but to authentic self-worth and confidence.

Context of the Quote

The featured quote is drawn from Alder’s exploration of how individuals respond to truthful, sometimes uncomfortable observations from others. She contrasts two paths:

One is the instinct to react defensively, allowing pride to shield us by rejecting or countering criticism.
The other is to dismantle pride and embrace vulnerability, which is not self-defeat but the groundwork for genuine humility.

Alder suggests that “as you walk through your vulnerability, you will meet humility on the way to courage.” In this philosophy, humility is not about humiliation but about openness to growth. With humility comes courage—the courage to release shame and become the person one is truly meant to be, rather than someone fixated on being right. The result is true confidence and self-worth, achieved through acceptance and transformation rather than avoidance or denial.

Leading Theorists and Intellectual Context

While Shannon L. Alder’s work is highly personal and practical, her ideas align with and echo several major theorists in psychology and personal development:

Theorist	Contribution
Brené Brown	Central to modern understanding of vulnerability. In her landmark research, Brown frames vulnerability as the birthplace of courage, creativity, and belonging—paralleling Alder’s emphasis on embracing vulnerability to develop courage and self-worth.
Carl Rogers	Developer of person-centered therapy, Rogers highlighted the importance of authenticity, genuineness, and unconditional positive regard. He believed true growth happens when people accept themselves without pretense—ideas mirrored in Alder’s advocacy for vulnerability as transformative.
Tara Brach	As a psychologist and teacher, Brach’s work on radical acceptance and self-compassion resonates with Alder’s encouragement to let go of shame and move toward genuine self-acceptance and confidence.
Kristin Neff	Pioneered research on self-compassion, which involves treating oneself with kindness during failures and inadequacies—a prerequisite for the humility and courage Alder describes.

Alder’s insights are thus part of a rich tradition that challenges ingrained beliefs about strength, urging us to see openness, humility, and self-reflection as the true sources of personal growth and leadership.

Summary of the Insight

Shannon L. Alder invites us to reconsider our reflex to defend pride and instead walk courageously through vulnerability. The journey she describes is not merely personal but universal—one that has been explored by leading minds in psychology and embraced in modern thinking about what it means to live authentically and lead with empathy. Her words serve as both comfort and call to action: to value truth, abandon defensive pride, and step into the ever-rising cycle of humility, courage, and self-worth

Term: Relational humility

Relational humility is the capacity to recognize the limits of your own perspective and to value the experiences, insights, and feelings of others, especially within interpersonal relationships. It means understanding that your view is only one among many, fostering deeper connection and genuine dialogue instead of prioritizing pride or the need to be ‘right’. Unlike self-deprecation or meekness, relational humility is an active openness—it is not about diminishing your worth but rather acknowledging that everyone’s contributions matter.

Key characteristics of relational humility:

Listening before asserting: Taking time to understand others’ viewpoints, even when they conflict with your own.
Admitting mistakes: Being willing to own your errors and shortcomings instead of defending them out of pride.
Letting go of superiority: Recognizing that your knowledge or status does not make you inherently better than others.
Prioritizing relationships over ego: Making decisions with the health of the relationship in mind, rather than letting pride dictate your actions.

Relational humility in the business setting is a powerful and necessary asset that directly contributes to superior individual and organizational performance. In the workplace, relational humility is the willingness of leaders and team members to admit limitations, value diverse contributions, and maintain authentic, open communication—even when doing so might challenge one’s ego or established authority.

Why is relational humility so valuable in business?

Builds trust and credibility: Employees are more likely to trust and follow leaders who demonstrate humility—by owning mistakes, valuing others’ input, and being approachable. This trust is foundational to high-performing teams and sustainable results.
Fosters collaboration and innovation: Relational humility encourages the free flow of ideas and feedback. Team members feel respected and motivated to contribute, leading to creative solutions and collective achievement.
Creates psychological safety: When leaders and colleagues admit they don’t have all the answers and are open to feedback, it signals safety to others. This psychological safety allows employees to take risks, share candidly, and support one another—key factors in organizational resilience and adaptability.
Enables continuous learning: Humble professionals are more receptive to feedback and more willing to learn from mistakes or setbacks. This fosters a culture of growth and ongoing improvement, essential for navigating changing business environments.
Authenticity and engagement: Relational humility allows individuals to bring their true selves to work, which drives higher engagement, job satisfaction, and a sense of belonging. Leaders who are authentic foster loyalty and discretionary effort among their teams.

Relational humility is courageous and strategically right. In environments where competition and performance pressure are high, it takes courage to admit you might be wrong or that someone else has a better idea. But this courage sends a powerful message: that long-term results and genuine connection matter more than protecting one’s pride. Humility is not weakness; it is a strategic strength that enables better decision-making, attracts and retains talent, and positions organizations to thrive.

Relational humility also prevents the self-sabotage of pride. In business, burning bridges, refusing to listen, or failing to seek feedback can lead to missed opportunities, stalled careers, and organizational failure—the professional equivalent of “cutting one’s nose to spite one’s face.” By embracing humility, professionals keep doors open, nurture valuable networks, and create opportunities for reconciliation and growth.

Practicing relational humility is authentic leadership. Leaders who are humble empower their people, acknowledge their dependence on others, and create an environment where purpose and results align. Research shows that humble leaders are seen as more promotable, foster higher team morale, and build more resilient organizations.

“Humility is undeniably a key trait of effective leadership, essential for building trust, fostering collaboration, and driving sustained organizational success.”

Relational humility is both courageous and right, because it demands we put outcomes, relationships, and the greater good above ego. In business, as in life, it is the foundation for meaningful connection, authentic leadership, and lasting success.

Exemplification

Consider the classic example of someone who, after a falling out, refuses to reach out and mend the relationship. This person may feel justified in their anger or embarrassment, but their pride creates a barrier they cannot cross, leaving them isolated and unhappy—what’s often called “cutting one’s nose to spite one’s face.” Pride prevents them from apologizing or forgiving, leading to lost opportunities for reconciliation and happiness.

Conversely, relational humility is shown when someone swallows their pride to return and say, “I was wrong,” or “Can we start again?” It’s the parent embracing a child who has made grave mistakes, or the friend who chooses understanding over holding a grudge. These choices often repair and deepen bonds, creating a richer, more resilient social fabric.

Consequences of Lacking Relational Humility

A lack of relational humility often results in burned bridges, ongoing conflict, and missed opportunities for growth. Research shows people low in humility struggle to form and repair strong social bonds, which can lead to poorer emotional well-being and less support—ultimately impacting long-term health and happiness.

Theoretical Roots and Key Theorist

The most influential psychologist in this field is Dr. Everett L. Worthington, Jr. His Relational Humility Scale is widely used to measure this trait, and his published work frames relational humility as the ability to put the health and needs of the relationship above one’s own pride or desire for dominance.

Dr. Everett L. Worthington, Jr.

Biography: Dr. Worthington is an American psychologist and Professor Emeritus at Virginia Commonwealth University. Initially notable for his work in forgiveness research, he has written extensively about humility’s role in effective relationships and emotional health. The loss of his mother to a violent crime shaped his focus on reconciliation and humility—leading to his pioneering work on relational humility.
Contribution: Worthington’s research centers on how humility facilitates forgiveness and repair in relationships. He argues that relational humility is fundamental to resolving conflict, sustaining long-term bonds, and achieving personal growth.

If you find yourself miserable after burning bridges and unable to go back, know that relational humility is the key to change. By acknowledging your limitations, embracing vulnerability, and reaching out, you can rebuild connections and enrich your life. Pride may keep you stuck, but humility opens the door to healing and new beginnings.

News and Tools

“An effective goal-setting system starts with disciplined thinking at the top, with leaders who invest the time and energy to choose what counts.” — John Doerr, Measure What Matters

About John Doerr

Leading Theorists on Goal Setting and Measurement

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

“When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it…your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind.” – Lord Kelvin (William Thomson)

About Lord Kelvin

Leading Theorists and the Science of Measurement

Share this:

OKRs vs. KPIs and the Balanced Scorecard

Leading Strategy Theorist Behind OKRs: Andy Grove

Share this:

Share this:

Core Components of the Strategic Alignment Model

Perspectives on Alignment

Key Theorists: N. Venkatraman and John C. Henderson

Share this:

Context of the Quote

Leading Theorists on Self-Deception

Philosophers

Psychologists

Modern Thinkers

Legacy and Insight

Share this:

Leading Theorists: Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Norton

Robert S. Kaplan:

David P. Norton:

Share this:

“Today I choose courage over comfort.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller and professor

Share this:

Share this:

“Blame is simply the discharging of discomfort and pain. It has an inverse relationship with accountability. Blaming is a way that we discharge anger.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

The Person Behind the Quote: Brené Brown

Leading Theorists Related to Blame and Accountability

Share this:

Share this:

“Courage starts with showing up and letting ourselves be seen.” – Brené Brown – researcher, storyteller, and professor

Share this:

Related Strategy Theorist: Jon Kabat-Zinn

Backstory and Relationship to Mindfulness

Biography

Share this:

Context of the Quote

Influential Theorists and Roots of Brown’s Work

Brown’s Impact and Legacy

Share this:

Share this:

“The most powerfully transformative executives possess a paradoxical mixture of personal humility and professional will. They are timid and ferocious. Shy and fearless. They are rare – and unstoppable.” – Jim Collins – Author, academic

Share this:

Share this:

Exemplification

Consequences of Lacking Relational Humility

Theoretical Roots and Key Theorist

Dr. Everett L. Worthington, Jr.

Share this:

Download brochure

Sign up for our newsletters - free