Select Page

Global Advisors | Quantified Strategy Consulting

Richard Koch
Term: Growth

Term: Growth

In financial and strategic disciplines, “growth” denotes the rate at which a company’s profits, revenues, dividends, or overall enterprise value are expected to increase over time. Growth is a central theme in corporate valuation, capital allocation, and competitive positioning, with foundational financial models and strategic frameworks prioritising a granular understanding of its drivers, sustainability, and impact.

Financial Theories Relating to Growth

Value = Profit × (1 – Reinvestment Rate) / (Cost of Capital – Growth)

This advanced valuation expression, as presented by David Wessels, Marc Goedhart, and Timothy Koller in Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies (McKinsey & Co.), formalises the interplay between profitability, reinvestment, and growth. Here:

  • Reinvestment Rate = Growth / ROIC, quantifies how much of generated profit must be reinvested to achieve a given growth rate, where ROIC is Return on Invested Capital. The formula demonstrates that value is maximised not simply by growth, but by growth achieved with high capital efficiency and without excessive reinvestment.

Gordon Growth Model (GGM) / Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
The Gordon Growth Model, developed by Myron J. Gordon and Eli Shapiro, is a foundational method for valuing equity based on the present value of an infinite stream of future dividends growing at a constant rate. Its formula is:

Intrinsic Value = Next Period DPS ÷ (Required Rate of Return – Dividend Growth Rate).

This model is widely used for established, dividend-paying businesses and illustrates how even modest changes in growth (g) can have an outsized effect on equity valuation, due to its presence in the denominator of the formula.

Aswath Damodaran’s Contributions

Aswath Damodaran, a leading academic on valuation, argues that sustainable growth must be underpinned by a firm’s investment returns exceeding its cost of capital. He emphasises that aggressive revenue growth without returns above the cost of capital destroys value, a critical principle for both analysts and executives.

Strategic Frameworks Involving Growth

Growth-Share Matrix (BCG Matrix)
A seminal business tool, the Growth-Share Matrix—developed by the Boston Consulting Group—categorises business units or products by market growth rate and relative market share. The framework, popularised by strategy theorist Bruce Henderson, divides assets into four quadrants:

  • Stars (high growth, high share)
  • Question Marks (high growth, low share)
  • Cash Cows (low growth, high share)
  • Dogs (low growth, low share)

This framework links growth directly to expected cash flow needs and capital allocation, guiding portfolio management, investment decisions, and exit strategies.

Richard Koch’s Insights
Richard Koch, strategy theorist and author, is best known for popularising the Pareto Principle (80/20 Rule) in business. Koch has demonstrated that a focus on fast-growing 20% of activities, customers, or products can disproportionately drive overall company growth and profitability, reinforcing the importance of targeted rather than uniform growth efforts.

Leading Strategy Theorist: Bruce Henderson

Bruce D. Henderson (1915–1992) was the founder of the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) and a seminal figure in the evolution of corporate strategy. Henderson introduced the Growth-Share Matrix in the early 1970s, giving managers a visual, analytic tool to allocate resources based on market growth’s effect on competitive dynamics and future cash requirements. His insight was that growth, when paired with relative market strength, dictates an organisation’s future capital needs and investment rationales—making disciplined analysis of growth rates central to effective strategy.

Henderson’s wider intellectual legacy includes the principles of the experience curve, which postulates that costs decline as output increases—a direct link between growth, scale, and operational efficiency. He founded BCG in 1963 and led it to become one of the world’s most influential strategy consultancies, shaping both practical and academic approaches to long-term value creation, competitive advantage, and business portfolio strategy. His contributions permanently altered how leaders assess and operationalise growth within their organisations.

Conclusion

“Growth” embodies far more than expansion; it is a core parameter in both the financial valuation of firms and their strategic management. Modern frameworks—from the value formulae of leading financial economists to the matrix-based guidance of strategic pioneers—underscore that not all growth is positive and that sustainable, value-accretive growth is predicated on return discipline, resource allocation, and market context. The work of thinkers such as Wessels, Goedhart, Koller, Damodaran, Koch, and Henderson ensures that growth remains the subject of rigorous, multidimensional analysis across finance and strategy.

read more
Quote: Richard Koch – Consultant, investor and author

Quote: Richard Koch – Consultant, investor and author

“80% of the results come from 20% of the effort. The key is knowing which 20%.” – Richard Koch – Consultant, investor and author

This quote summarises the essence of the 80/20 Principle, a core concept in business strategy and personal effectiveness that has revolutionised how individuals and organisations approach efficiency and results. The insight traces its roots to the Pareto Principle, originally observed by Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto in the late 19th century, who noticed that 80% of Italy’s land was owned by 20% of its population. Richard Koch, a British management consultant, entrepreneur, and renowned author, reinterpreted and greatly expanded this principle, framing it as a universal law underpinning the distribution of effort and reward in almost every domain.

In his bestselling book The 80/20 Principle, Koch shows that a small minority of actions, resources, or inputs nearly always yield the vast majority of desirable outcomes—whether profit, value, or progress. Koch’s central insight, as expressed in this quote, is the competitive advantage gained not simply from working harder, but from consistently identifying and focusing on the few efforts that drive the greatest impact. For leaders, strategists, and achievers alike, the practical challenge is “knowing which 20%,” requiring careful analysis, experimentation, and a willingness to question assumptions about where value is truly created.

In his career, Koch has demonstrated the application of his principles through venture capital investments and business advisory, targeting the vital few opportunities with outsized potential and helping businesses focus on their most profitable products, customers, or ideas. This philosophy is deeply relevant in an age of information overload and resource constraints, offering a way to cut through complexity and direct energy for maximum effect.

About Richard Koch

Born in London in 1950, Richard John Koch is a British management consultant, business investor, and prolific author whose work has had a global influence on management and strategy thinking. Educated at Wadham College, Oxford (M.A.) and The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania (MBA), Koch began his career at the Boston Consulting Group before becoming a partner at Bain & Company. In 1983, he co-founded L.E.K. Consulting.

Koch’s investment career is as notable as his advisory work; he has backed and helped grow companies such as Filofax, Plymouth Gin, Betfair, and FanDuel. His hallmark book, The 80/20 Principle, published in 1997 and substantially updated since, has sold over a million copies worldwide, been translated into dozens of languages, and is recognised as a business classic. Beyond The 80/20 Principle, Koch has authored or co-authored more than 19 books on management, value creation, and lifestyle efficiency.

Koch’s legacy is rooted in translating an elegant statistical reality into an actionable mindset for business leaders, entrepreneurs, and individuals seeking to achieve more by doing less—focusing always on the “vital few” over the “trivial many”.

Leading Theorists Related to the Subject Matter

Vilfredo Pareto

The intellectual foundation for the 80/20 Principle originates with Vilfredo Pareto (1848–1923), an Italian economist and sociologist. Pareto’s original observation of uneven distribution patterns—first in wealth and later in broader social and natural phenomena—gave rise to what became known as the Pareto Principle or Pareto Law. His insights provided the mathematical and empirical groundwork for the efficiency-focused approaches that Koch and others would later popularise.

Joseph M. Juran

Building on Pareto, Joseph M. Juran (1904–2008) was a pioneering quality management theorist who championed the 80/20 Principle in operational and quality improvement contexts. He coined the terms “vital few and trivial many,” urging managers to focus quality-improvement efforts on the small subset of causes generating most defects—a direct precursor to Koch’s broader strategic applications.

Peter F. Drucker

Peter F. Drucker (1909–2005), known as the father of modern management, extended related themes throughout his career, emphasising the necessity of concentrating on the few activities that contribute most to organisational and individual performance. Drucker’s advocacy for focus, effectiveness, and the elimination of low-value work dovetails with the spirit of the 80/20 Principle, even if he did not formalise it as such.

Richard Koch’s quote is a reminder—backed by deep analytical rigour and hard-won experience—that efficiency is not just about working harder or faster, but about systematically uncovering and amplifying the small fraction of efforts, decisions, and resources that will yield extraordinary returns.

read more
Quote: Richard Koch Author, investor, strategist

Quote: Richard Koch Author, investor, strategist

“Why is growth important? Because the power of compound arithmetic is such that, in a high-growth venture, sales – and profits, when they appear – will multiply quickly. It is quite different from the great majority of firms, which grow only slowly, and where profit growth is difficult and far from automatic.” – Richard Koch – Author, investor, strategist

Richard Koch is a highly regarded British management consultant, entrepreneur, and author best known for his work on business strategy and the principle of exponential growth. Educated at Oxford University and the Wharton School, Koch began his career at the Boston Consulting Group and later became a partner at Bain & Company before co-founding the influential consultancy L.E.K. Consulting. As an investor, he has played a significant role in the success of several well-known companies, including Filofax, Plymouth Gin, Betfair, FanDuel, and Auto1. Koch is also celebrated for his bestselling book, The 80/20 Principle, which has sold over a million copies worldwide and introduced a broader audience to the idea that a small proportion of efforts often lead to the majority of results.

The quote—“Why is growth important? Because the power of compound arithmetic is such that, in a high-growth venture, sales – and profits, when they appear – will multiply quickly. It is quite different from the great majority of firms, which grow only slowly, and where profit growth is difficult and far from automatic.”—captures the essence of Koch’s philosophy and expertise in business strategy.

Context and Backstory

Koch has spent his career examining what propels some ventures to achieve extraordinary results while others stagnate. His work consistently points to the transformational power of rapid, compounded growth—a concept drawn from mathematics but observed powerfully in business. The principle of compound growth, as illustrated by both Koch and other thought leaders, describes exponential progress where gains in one period build upon the previous, leading to an accelerating trajectory rather than linear development. Koch contrasts this with the more common fate of most businesses: slow, incremental growth where every small gain must be arduously earned, and profitability is never a guarantee.

This distinction is critical for entrepreneurs and strategists. High-growth ventures harness the “snowball effect” of compounding, where early momentum can quickly escalate into market dominance and substantial profit, often outstripping competitors who rely on traditional, slower-growth models. Koch’s decades of investing and consulting—backed by his direct involvement in rapidly scaling businesses—provide real-world evidence of this principle’s power. His insights encourage business leaders to view growth not merely as an aim, but as an essential, multiplying force that can radically alter outcomes if strategically pursued.

In summary, Koch’s quote encapsulates the difference between ordinary and extraordinary business outcomes, emphasizing the necessity for leaders to understand and harness compound growth in their strategies. His career and writings offer both a theoretical foundation and practical guidance for those seeking to leverage this “hidden magic” in their own ventures.

read more
Term: Business Unit Strategy

Term: Business Unit Strategy

Business Unit Strategy, as described by Richard Koch, focuses on how a single business or division within a larger corporation achieves and sustains competitive advantage within a specific, well-defined market or “arena” (a product-market segment). This level of strategy is about winning in one particular space, rather than deciding which spaces to play in.

Key Elements of Business Unit Strategy (per Koch):

  • Arena-Specific: Business unit strategy operates within the boundaries of a particular product, service, or customer group—what Koch calls an “arena”.
  • Competitive Advantage Focus: It is centrally concerned with how a business beats competitors. Koch identifies two principal sources:
    • Cost Leadership: Supplying a comparable product at a lower price and cost than rivals.
    • Differentiation: Offering a product that is more useful, easier to use, or more aesthetically pleasing than competitors’ products.
  • Simplicity and Scale: Koch emphasizes that both cost and differentiation advantages are often achieved by having a product that is simpler and produced at a larger scale than rivals.
  • Market Share in Context: The value of market share is only meaningful when assessed in the context of the specific arena relative to competition, often within highly specialized or niche markets.
  • Resource Deployment: At the business unit level, strategy dictates how to deploy resources and capabilities to maximize success in the chosen arena.
 

Business Unit vs. Corporate Strategy (per Koch):

 
Business Unit Strategy
Corporate Strategy
Scope
Single market or arena (product-market segment)
Multi-business, deciding “where to play” as an organization
Key Question
How do we win here?
Which arenas/markets should we be in?
Focus
Achieving and sustaining competitive advantage against rivals
Portfolio management; value creation across businesses
Basis
Cost leadership or differentiation within the market
Allocation of resources and synergies across units

Richard Koch asserts that the heart of any firm is the product-market segment(s) where it holds or can hold a distinctive edge, whether through cost or uniqueness, and that “strategy” at this level is about defending and growing that advantage.

In summary, business unit strategy is about how to compete and win within a chosen market, whereas corporate strategy is about deciding which markets or businesses to be in and optimizing the whole portfolio for maximum value. Koch’s work draws on the importance of focusing efforts—guided by the 80/20 principle—on those few arenas where success is most likely and most valuable.

read more
Quote: Richard Koch Author, investor, strategist

Quote: Richard Koch Author, investor, strategist

“The 80/20 Principle asserts that a minority of causes, inputs, or effort usually lead to a majority of the results, outputs, or rewards.” – Richard Koch – Author, investor, strategist

The quote, “The 80/20 Principle asserts that a minority of causes, inputs, or effort usually lead to a majority of the results, outputs, or rewards,” originates from the acclaimed British author, entrepreneur, and strategist Richard Koch. This principle, also widely known as the Pareto Principle, suggests that in many aspects of business and life, a focused minority is responsible for producing the majority of results. In practical terms, Koch observed that 20% of activities typically lead to 80% of the value or outcomes—whether those are profits, happiness, or productivity.

Koch’s sharp insight into this pattern did not emerge in isolation. He built his career in environments where optimizing results and leveraging limited resources was essential. After earning an M.A. from Oxford University and an M.B.A. from The Wharton School, Koch launched his professional journey with the Boston Consulting Group, before becoming a partner at Bain & Company. There, consulting for leading global organizations, he recognized that the most significant outcomes often stemmed from a narrow selection of strategic moves or high-leverage initiatives.

Leaving Bain in 1983, Koch co-founded L.E.K. Consulting and became a serial investor and entrepreneur, with ownership in businesses such as Filofax, Plymouth Gin, Betfair, and FanDuel. Across these varied ventures, Koch repeatedly saw the 80/20 rule in action—whether identifying the most profitable customers, streamlining operations, or focusing on the few core products that drove sales.

About Richard Koch

Richard Koch (born July 28, 1950) has become a globally recognized voice on strategy, entrepreneurship, and the science of effectiveness. Beyond his consulting work and private equity investments, Koch has authored several influential books, most notably The 80/20 Principle, which has sold over a million copies and been translated into 35 languages. His writing popularized the application of the Pareto Principle beyond economics, demonstrating its practical relevance for business, personal development, and lifestyle choices.

Koch’s personal journey reflects the core lesson of his message: by identifying the vital few factors that matter most, and minimizing time on the trivial many, individuals and organizations can multiply their effectiveness and reward. He has credited his mastery of this principle as the key to amassing significant wealth and achieving a form of early retirement, allowing him the freedom to invest, write, and speak across the world.

Today, Koch’s 80/20 Principle stands not just as a tool for efficiency but as a transformative lens for reimagining how we approach challenges, prioritize resources, and strive for lasting success.

read more
Term: Corporate Strategy

Term: Corporate Strategy

Corporate strategy, as outlined by Richard Koch, refers to the overarching plan and direction for a multi-business organization, focusing on where the firm should compete and what kinds of businesses it should own or enter. This type of strategy is concerned with the selection and management of a portfolio of business units, industries, or product-market segments, and the allocation of resources among them. Koch emphasizes that corporate strategy is about understanding and choosing the arenas in which a firm operates, especially in cases where multiple distinct business areas are involved.

Related theorist: Richard Koch

Corporate strategy asks questions such as:

  • In which markets or industries should the company operate?
  • How should resources be allocated among business units?
  • How should the businesses be structured to maximize overall value and competitiveness?

It focuses on creating value through synergies, developing core competencies shared across units, and ensuring that the whole organization delivers more value than the sum of its parts.

Business Unit Strategy vs. Corporate Strategy (as per Koch)

 
Corporate Strategy
Business Unit Strategy
Scope
Multi-business, multi-industry; whole corporation
Single business or product-market segment
Focus
Where to compete (which arenas/businesses)
How to compete (within a chosen arena/business)
Key Questions
What businesses should we own? How do we manage the portfolio? What is the right mix for overall advantage?
How do we win in our chosen market/industry? What is our source of competitive advantage?
Resource Allocation
Allocates capital and resources across business units and functions
Deploys resources to maximize advantage within a specific unit or market
Value Creation
Pursues synergies, portfolio optimization, and leveraging core capabilities across units
Pursues cost leadership, differentiation, or focus strategies for competitive edge in a defined arena

Koch stresses that, at the business unit level, strategy centers on achieving competitive advantage within a specific product-market segment or arena—by either being the lowest-cost producer or by offering a product that is markedly more attractive to customers than competitors’ offerings. In contrast, corporate strategy is about identifying and managing the “few arenas” (businesses) that generate the most value, and ensuring they work together to deliver superior results for the corporation as a whole.

“At the heart of a firm is one or more product-market segments or arenas in which it operates. If the firm operates in several arenas, one of them, or a few, will supply most or all the cash and profit the firm generates… In these few arenas, which are the intersection of the product and a similar group of customers, the firm has competitive advantage.”
— Richard Koch.

In summary, corporate strategy is about the selection and management of a portfolio of businesses to create overall value, whereas business unit strategy is about achieving and sustaining competitive advantage in a chosen market or segment. Koch’s distinction makes it clear: corporate strategy sets the direction for the whole enterprise; business unit strategy wins the battle in each chosen arena.

read more
Strategy Tools: Opportunity/vulnerability matrix – “The Bananagram”

Strategy Tools: Opportunity/vulnerability matrix – “The Bananagram”

Logic suggests that high relative market share (RMS) should translate into higher profitability (unless the firm was not using its potential advantages or pricing to penetrate the market further). This suggests that a “normative curve / band” exists to describe this phenomenon i.e. the expected profitability of the average business segment in a particular industry according to normal expectations conditional on the segment’s relative market share. This normative band is shown in the figure below as the area between the two curves.

The Opportunity / Vulnerability Matrix
The Opportunity / Vulnerability Matrix

The curve is best explained using data / businesses that have been correctly segmented. In practice such data can only be obtained after analysing the organisation and having a good understanding of any relationships. The band used to be shown coloured yellow, hence the chart became known as a “bananagram”.

The implication of the curve is that high relative market share positions, correctly segmented, are valuable segments / businesses. Managers should therefore strive to achieve / participate in these segments / businesses.

Another implication, in some ways obscured focusing primarily on the growth share matrix (especially where “dogs” are concerned), is that it is useful to improve relative market share in a business segment whatever the starting position. The bananagram enables one to calculate a rough estimate of the equilibrium profitability to be expected from any particular position (relative market share). Therefore it is possible to estimate the potential benefit of moving any particular segment position against the cost of doing so – extra marketing spend, product development or lower prices. This allows one to quantitatively assess whether it is worth trying to raise RMS and which segment / business investments give the best return to shareholders.

Empirical evidence suggests that the majority of observations would fall between the two curved lines and it would be unusual for businesses to fall outside this band. There are two possible positions where a business segment can find itself outside of the two curved lines – this is depicted in the figure below.

The Opportunity / Vulnerability Matrix – Example
The Opportunity / Vulnerability Matrix Example

Business A is earning (for example) 45 per cent return on net capital employed, a good return, but is in a weak relative market share position (say 0,5x, or only half the size of the segment leader). The theory and empirical data from the matrix suggests that the combination of these two positions is at best anomalous, and probably unsustainable. Business A is therefore in the “vulnerability” part of the matrix. The expectation must be that in the medium term, either the business must improve its relative market share position to sustain its profitability (the dotted arrow moving left), or that it will decline in profitability (to about break-even). Why should this happen? Well, the banana indicates that the market leader in this business may well be earning 40 percent or even more ROCE in the segment. What may be happening is that the leader is holding a price umbrella over the market, that is, is pricing unsustainably high, so that even the competitors with weak market share are protected from normal competition (especially where pricing is concerned). What happens if the market leader suddenly cuts prices by 20 percent? They will still earn a good return, but the weaker competitors will not. The leader may opt to provide extra product benefits or services, instead of lowering prices, but the effect would still be a margin cut. It is as well to know that business A is vulnerable. If relative market share cannot be improved, it is sensible to sell it before the profitability declines.

Now let’s look at business B. This is a business in a strong relative market share position – the leader in its segment, five times larger than its nearest rival. It is earning 2 percent ROCE. This is a wonderful business to find. The theory and practical data suggest that such a business should be making 40 percent ROCE, not 2 percent. Nine times out of ten when such businesses are found, it is possible to make them very much more profitable, usually by radical cost reduction (often involving restructure), but sometimes through radical improvement of service and product offering to the customer at a low extra cost to the supplier, but enabling a large price hike to be made. Managements of particular businesses very often become complacent with historical returns and think it is impossible to raise profits in a step function to three, four or five times their current level. The bananagram challenges that thinking for leadership segment positions, and usually the bananagram is proved right. After all, high relative market share implies huge potential advantages; but these must be earned and exploited, as they do not automatically disgorge huge profits.

Source: Koch, R – “Financial Times Guides Strategy” – Fourth edition – Prentice Hall – page 313-316

read more

Download brochure

Introduction brochure

What we do, case studies and profiles of some of our amazing team.

Download

Our latest podcasts on Spotify

Sign up for our newsletters - free

Global Advisors | Quantified Strategy Consulting